Cemal Bayramoglu schrieb:
dear Cemal,
> What I was proposing was not
> as a solution to incompatibilities between such multiple
> dependencies.
fair enough.
I am a believer in keeping the core as simple and light as possible
whilst still open (and designed for) potential enhancement with
ext
gt; Bayramoglu
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. März 2010 14:26
> An: users
> Betreff: Re: Wicket JavaScript Library Integration - A Common Base
>
> Uwe!
>
> I was thinking in terms of a simple core, of well defined and limited
> scope. It would provide a clear and well trodden way for p
f: Re: Wicket JavaScript Library Integration - A Common Base
Uwe!
I was thinking in terms of a simple core, of well defined and limited
scope. It would provide a clear and well trodden way for people to
integrate their favourite JavaScript libraries with Wicket in a
consistent and effective, trie
Uwe!
I was thinking in terms of a simple core, of well defined and limited
scope. It would provide a clear and well trodden way for people to
integrate their favourite JavaScript libraries with Wicket in a
consistent and effective, tried and tested way.
As you say, there are always going to be po
I like the idea as well :)
2010/3/19 Cemal Bayramoglu :
> There's been plenty of encouraging feedback about wiQuery [1] and how
> cleanly it integrates jQuery and makes it easy to use in a Wicket app.
> We also get lots of questions, sometimes unrelated to wiQuery, about
> how to integrate other J
Uwe Schäfer schrieb:
Hi Cemal,
I was thinking that it could possibly be sensible to have another
project where we abstract out the mechanisms wiQuery provides for
resources and JavaScript statements.
to keep that topic alive: do you agree that providing a unified way for
component authors t
Hi,
This would be great, but I think we can only provide an implementation to
JavaScript frameworks designed in an unobtrusive way. When I tried to bind
ExtJs within Wicket, I had some pain to adapt ExtJs components to Wicket.
For the refactoring part, I don't see any problem to achieve this. Gen
I like it! Where do I sign up? :)
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Cemal Bayramoglu <
jweekend_for...@cabouge.com> wrote:
> There's been plenty of encouraging feedback about wiQuery [1] and how
> cleanly it integrates jQuery and makes it eas
Cemal Bayramoglu schrieb:
dear Cemal,
I was thinking that it could possibly be sensible to have another
project where we abstract out the mechanisms wiQuery provides for
resources and JavaScript statements.
i have no idea of how wiQuery does it, but i strongly agree to the
urgent need of a
There's been plenty of encouraging feedback about wiQuery [1] and how
cleanly it integrates jQuery and makes it easy to use in a Wicket app.
We also get lots of questions, sometimes unrelated to wiQuery, about
how to integrate other JavaScript libraries.
I was thinking that it could possibly be se
10 matches
Mail list logo
