Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-04-18 Thread Major Péter
TeamCity is still unable to connect to the SVN server, so there are no artifacts for 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT. You need to build the artifacts for yourself.. Regards, Peter 2010-04-18 20:39 keltezéssel, Nikita Tovstoles írta: > Could someone pls point me to 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT maven repo location? It's not > h

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-04-18 Thread Nikita Tovstoles
Could someone pls point me to 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT maven repo location? It's not here: http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-core/ thanks -nikita On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:26 PM, nino martinez wael wrote: > artifacts should find their way into the repo once team city buil

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-04-02 Thread nino martinez wael
is that when running a test or? 2010/4/2 新希望软件 -- 俞宏伟 : > i found thant push component has some problem. after update push compenet to > 1.4.7-snapshot, the application throws some error message: > > 04-02 09:34:55.546[ RequestCycle.java:1521:ERROR] There is no > application attached to curr

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-04-01 Thread 新希望软件 -- 俞宏伟
i found thant push component has some problem. after update push compenet to 1.4.7-snapshot, the application throws some error message: 04-02 09:34:55.546[ RequestCycle.java:1521:ERROR] There is no application attached to current thread http-8081-4 org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: T

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-04-01 Thread nino martinez wael
Well, one could see that in version x.x.x of wicketstuff core project x was excluded.. It was just a proposition. As with everything else it has pro's and con's. 2010/4/1 Jeremy Thomerson : > there's already an attic - why create a new one?  it will just generate more > emails to the list whining

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-03-31 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
there's already an attic - why create a new one? it will just generate more emails to the list whining about "i can't find such and such" - by those who can't use the search function well. there's nothing special about an ex-core project that means it needs its own attic -- Jeremy Thomerson http

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-03-31 Thread nino martinez wael
I guess we could start a branch, called wicketstuff-core-attic. Then upgrade them to latest wicket version and see if they work and if not, then remove them. Unless someone wants to fix the errors. 2010/3/28 Major Péter : > JavaEE-Inject is tested, and OK. > > It looks like there are projects, whi

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-03-28 Thread Major Péter
JavaEE-Inject is tested, and OK. It looks like there are projects, which are depending to a specific wicket version (1.4-rc*, 1.4.5): * multi-text-input-parent * flot-parent/flot * flot-parent/flot-examples * wicket-html5-parent * ddcalendar-parent/ddcalendar * ddcalendar-parent/ddcalendar-example

RE: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-03-24 Thread Stefan Lindner
Hi Boris, thank you for doing the job. I have tested jWicket again and everything looks fine. Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Boris Goldowsky [mailto:bgoldow...@cast.org] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 22:14 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Wicketstuff updated! As

Re: Wicketstuff updated!

2010-03-24 Thread nino martinez wael
artifacts should find their way into the repo once team city builds.. 2010/3/24 Boris Goldowsky : > As discussed, and not hearing any objections, I've updated the > wicketstuff-core project to depend on Wicket 1.4.7.  wicketstuff-core's > version number is now 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT, and the idea is that

Wicketstuff updated!

2010-03-24 Thread Boris Goldowsky
As discussed, and not hearing any objections, I've updated the wicketstuff-core project to depend on Wicket 1.4.7. wicketstuff-core's version number is now 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT, and the idea is that people can test it, and barring any major problems it can be released as a stable version 1.4.7 . N