gt;>> Emond Papegaaij
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thursday 31 December 2009 23:31:34 Olger Warnier wrote:
> > >>>> Hi Sam,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Found the way to solve it. It is fixed in the trunk. Still need to
> > >
Thursday 31 December 2009 23:31:34 Olger Warnier wrote:
> >>>> Hi Sam,
> >>>>
> >>>> Found the way to solve it. It is fixed in the trunk. Still need to fix
> >>>> the build server - so a check out and build of the whole is probab
>>>> Olger
>>>>
>>>> On 31 dec 2009, at 22:43, s...@sambarrow.com wrote:
>>>>> In my opinion, that's how it should work; just seems like common sense
>>>>> to me. Even for regular (non-anonymous) classes, it would be useful
&
>> On 31 dec 2009, at 22:43, s...@sambarrow.com wrote:
> >>> In my opinion, that's how it should work; just seems like common sense
> >>> to me. Even for regular (non-anonymous) classes, it would be useful
> >>> although that's not as i
far as the technical part I have no idea. I've only been working with
>>> swam for 3 days. But I will do some looking at the source code.
>>>
>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Olger Warnie
27;s not as important.
> >
> > As far as the technical part I have no idea. I've only been working with
> > swam for 3 days. But I will do some looking at the source code.
> >
> > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> >
> > -Original Message-
>
Wow that was quick. Thanks a lot I really appreciate it
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:31:34
To:
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam,
Found the way to solve it. It is fixed in the trunk. Still need to fix the
m
> for 3 days. But I will do some looking at the source code.
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Olger Warnier
> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
> To:
> Subject: Re: question about swarm
>
> Hi Sam & Jeremy
some looking at the source code.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Olger Warnier
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:35:22
To:
Subject: Re: question about swarm
Hi Sam & Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite fragile - I
had a lo
Hi Sam & Jeremy,
Together with the remark that Jeremy made - I agree, it is quite fragile - I
had a look at the code that does the checks.
I could 'assume' that an anonymous class needs the same rights as the 'normal'
class. so when your CreateItemPage has the proper rights, an anonymous varia
That's extremely fragile.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Olger Warnier wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I have added a sample to the secureform sample where the home page creates
> an anonymous class of the MySecurePage
> An anonymous page has a kind of
I know I can do that, but there's no way do do it by inheritance? I have
hundreds of anonymous subclasses throughout my application. Seems
sensible that subclasses should inherit their parent's permissions.
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 10:41 +0100, Olger Warnier wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> I have added a samp
Hi Sam,
I have added a sample to the secureform sample where the home page creates an
anonymous class of the MySecurePage
An anonymous page has a kind of a class name. Look for a
ERROR - RequestCycle - Not authorized to instantiate class
org.apache.wicket.security.examples.secur
I hope this is the right list for wasp/swarm.
How do i manage permissions for an anonymous subclass?
I have a page called ItemPage. I can view ItemPage, but if I try to
redirect to an anonymous subclass of ItemPage, i get an access denied
error.
this works:
setResponsePage(new CreateItemPage(getP
14 matches
Mail list logo
