I tried to implement something like:
// java docs removed for clarity
public abstract class Change implements
IClusterable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
// former type
public FORMER former;
protected Change(final FORMER former)
{
setFormer(former);
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2187
done. thank you.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ricky wrote:
> thanks, i'll create a JIRA issue and submit a patch tonight, appreciate
> your time!
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
>
>> if you have a patch for bet
thanks, i'll create a JIRA issue and submit a patch tonight, appreciate your
time!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> if you have a patch for better toString() impl be my guest and attach it to
> jira
>
> Those Changes classes are internal to component, they are inner class
if you have a patch for better toString() impl be my guest and attach it to
jira
Those Changes classes are internal to component, they are inner classes of
Component so they dont have to specify that extra name..
Its just verbose. Also those 2 are protected final but i think they could be
private
or better have a something like IChange,
that would simply the change "component" type hierarchy and make our naming
conventions more apparent ... is that a valid opinion?
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ricky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This concerns Wicket Version : 1.4-rc2
>
>
>
Hi,
This concerns Wicket Version : 1.4-rc2
In componentModelChange class, we see the following :
@Override
public String toString()
{
return "ComponentModelChange[component: " + getPath() + "]";
}
"ComponentModelChange[" piece of it, in toString( ) sh
