Re: wicket 1.5 xml/doctype/html header: xhtml vs html5

2011-07-30 Thread robert.mcguinness
For Wicket *1.5* I've been using:




;



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-5-xml-doctype-html-header-xhtml-vs-html5-tp3698608p3706667.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: wicket 1.5 xml/doctype/html header: xhtml vs html5

2011-07-30 Thread Martijn Dashorst
You can use xhtml5 together with wicket if you like strict markup, or
just plain html5. There are some (afaik undefined) rules about closing
 and  tags, but other than that, (x)html5 should work.

Martijn

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Donohoe Digital  wrote:
> From https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html, are these still
> the desired tags for the start of a wicket html file?
>
> 
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
> xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd";
> xml:lang="en" lang="en">
>
> and
>
>  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">;
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
>
> xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.3-strict.dtd";
>      xml:lang="en"
>      lang="en">
>
> Of these two options, which is preferred?  Why would I choose the xml start
> (versus DOCTYPE)?
>
> Does either choice impact the use of HTML 5?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-5-xml-doctype-html-header-xhtml-vs-html5-tp3698608p3698608.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



wicket 1.5 xml/doctype/html header: xhtml vs html5

2011-07-27 Thread Donohoe Digital
>From https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html, are these still
the desired tags for the start of a wicket html file?


http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd";
xml:lang="en" lang="en">

and

;
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";  
 
xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.3-strict.dtd";  
  xml:lang="en"  
  lang="en"> 

Of these two options, which is preferred?  Why would I choose the xml start
(versus DOCTYPE)?

Does either choice impact the use of HTML 5?

Thanks,

-Doug



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-5-xml-doctype-html-header-xhtml-vs-html5-tp3698608p3698608.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org