Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread Vincent Massol
On Jun 15, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: Hi XWiki Devs Users, here's the current proposal for the XWiki Enterprise 2.0 roadmap. Please give us your feedback about it and tell us whether you think we missed anything important. Please note that this roadmap covers the next 3

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread Vincent Massol
On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: Guillaume Lerouge wrote: Hi XWiki Devs Users, here's the current proposal for the XWiki Enterprise 2.0 roadmap. Please give us your feedback about it and tell us whether you think we missed anything important. Please note that

Re: [xwiki-users] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Richard, On Jun 16, 2009, at 9:31 AM, goldring, richard wrote: Hi, Maybe not in the next build, but: * more wysiwyg page layout tools (instead of hand coding css) would be good to enable users to rapidly and quickly knock up good looking pages, I think this could be solved with the

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread jerem
The points I would focus on : - of course, syntax 2.0 and wysiwyg - Lucene search : I agree it's a key feature, and people do not find it very intuitive as it is ... Why not merging tags into lucene search bringing possibility to refine a search on a tags list ? It would give greater value to

[xwiki-users] [xwiki-1.8.4] - WatchList message pb

2009-06-16 Thread Alban
Hi all, I have a problem with the watchlistmessage that i tried to modified but i always received the same old message when there is some changes in a doc or space. What's wrong with it ? I edit the watxhlistmessage obkect (xwiki/bin/edit/XWiki/WatchListMessage?editor=object ) and modified it but

Re: [xwiki-users] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread Vincent Massol
On Jun 16, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: Hi Richard, On Jun 16, 2009, at 9:31 AM, goldring, richard wrote: Hi, Maybe not in the next build, but: * more wysiwyg page layout tools (instead of hand coding css) would be good to enable users to rapidly and quickly knock up

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread Vincent Massol
On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:33 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: Hi XWikiers, thanks for the feedback :-) Here's the updated tasklist (I've probably added too much stuff, we might need to remove some parts in the course of the roadmap): *Tasks with people already planned to work on:* -

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
- I'm not sure we want to make the WYSIWYG work in Safari Opera by ourselves. Based on customer user feedback we might need to focus on making it work in IE8 first. +1 for IE8 and postponing safari/opera to later or letting contributors do it if someone is

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki Enterprise 2.0 Roadmap

2009-06-16 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
Guillaume Lerouge wrote: Hi XWikiers, thanks for the feedback :-) Here's the updated tasklist (I've probably added too much stuff, we might need to remove some parts in the course of the roadmap): *Tasks with people already planned to work on:* - Rendering (Thomas) - Fix

Re: [xwiki-users] users Digest, Vol 23, Issue 26

2009-06-16 Thread Len Wanger
- Improve WYSIWYG editor speed. I am running into speed problems in the WYSISYG editor. When I type there is often 10-15 seconds of lag between when I type a key and when it shows up on the screen. This makes it very difficult to edit large sections of text. - Which browser are you

[xwiki-users] assitance smtp config for xwiki centos 5.3

2009-06-16 Thread Aziz Jarrah
I am currently running XWIKI ENTERPRISE 1.8.4.20192 with xwiki watch 1.1 I have read through the mailing list that there currently is no way to use a 3rd party email server with xwiki or xwiki watch. I understand that will be implemented in the future at some point. My question is if there is