Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-11-06 Thread coldserenity
And yes, that solved original problem -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Upgrade-to-3-2-minor-issues-tp6883965p6967192.html Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ users mailing list

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-11-04 Thread coldserenity
Hi Sergiu, I have updated my database engine to 'InnoDB'. I just took the query from previously attached file and by using Notepad++ and text replace created a set of alters to update engine. I ran those alters one-by-one. With a success :) ==

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-20 Thread jerem
I had the same issue, the workaround I used was solution 3 : move back table activitystream_events_params to use MyISAM ;) Switching to InnoDb is not without consequences : in my case I perform full online backups with mysqlhotcopy command, with InnoDb it won't be possible anymore. And to perform

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-12 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 10/12/2011 04:01 AM, coldserenity wrote: Hello, Thanks a lot for 3.2 Release! From the good things I've noticed, the full text search indeed returns more relevant result - especially the look-up in search. Please report anything you still don't like with the search results.

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-12 Thread coldserenity
Please report anything you still don't like with the search results. Adjusting the scoring mechanism isn't something that can be precisely done without real word experiments, so real feedback is much appreciated (and needed). I'll keep that in mind :) Can you provide the full stack trace

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-12 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 10/12/2011 04:53 AM, coldserenity wrote: Please report anything you still don't like with the search results. Adjusting the scoring mechanism isn't something that can be precisely done without real word experiments, so real feedback is much appreciated (and needed). I'll keep that in mind

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-12 Thread coldserenity
Could you upgrade the version of MySQL used? I can try to but that might take me couple of days since I'm not a MySQL guru Is the activitystream_events table correctly set up with utf8 encoding? Are the other tables using InnoDB or MyISAM? I have attached the file

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-12 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 10/12/2011 06:02 AM, coldserenity wrote: Could you upgrade the version of MySQL used? I can try to but that might take me couple of days since I'm not a MySQL guru Is the activitystream_events table correctly set up with utf8 encoding? Are the other tables using InnoDB or MyISAM? I have

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-12 Thread Roman Muntyanu
Thanks Sergiu for your help. I'll go with the second approach. -Original Message- From: users-boun...@xwiki.org [mailto:users-boun...@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of Sergiu Dumitriu Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 21:44 PM To: XWiki Users Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues

2011-10-12 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
...@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of Sergiu Dumitriu Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 21:44 PM To: XWiki Users Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] Upgrade to 3.2 minor issues On 10/12/2011 06:02 AM, coldserenity wrote: Could you upgrade the version of MySQL used? I can try to but that might take me couple of days