Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

+1 (binding) Verified signed source tarball, deployed a local kvm based env in advanced zone and was able to validate vm, volume and network lifecycles tests. - Rohit From: Paul Angus Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

The VR’s IP address was not being reported on the main GUI window, but I found it in the VR details (and also via ifconfig on the VR itself). I can ping both ways successfully: From the management server to the VR and vice versa. On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: NetApp

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address. On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mgmt. server should ssh

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I'm seeing the same thing. VR has a guest IP, but no management IP. If I cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline I can see that the eth1 ip=0.0.0.0 and eth1mask=0.0.0.0 which is nonsense... I'll get someone to look into it. Thanks mike paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you used the 6.5 sdk ? I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in. Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still supported in CS 4.11. On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote: NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Mgmt. server should ssh into VR. I'll fire a similar build in out lab. paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org;

can't enable autoscaling options

Hi there! Some time ago I am trying to enable the "autoscaling" function on my cloudstack platform without success. The idea is to enable the function without netscaler for a kind of POC, however and beyond to meet the prerequisites (enable the function from global settings, create a template

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Hi Mike, Paul, everyone, I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of security group (host-level firewall) which is not

CloudStack-UI: Release 1.411.24 Overview

Dear community, we released a new version of CSUI 1.411.24. If the e-mail is not displayed correctly, please use following links to read announcement on GitHub. EN: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/wiki/1.411.24-ReleaseNotes-En RU:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Thanks, Rohit! From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5 NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or

Re: Information on VXLAN implementations (and other guest isolation methods)

Hi Alexandre, VXLAN on KVM works very well and we've had it in production for a number of years now. Please see this document on how it is implemented: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Linux+native+VXLAN+support+on+KVM+hypervisor Cloudstack does create all the VXLAN

Re: Build CloudStack 4.10.0 Error

As Rafael mentioned this was a known issue and fixed (the commit he sent). You can check the version of java running in the build tools like: docker run -it --entrypoint environment-info.sh khos2ow/cloudstack-deb-builder:ubuntu1404 java version: openjdk version "1.8.0_171" OpenJDK Runtime

Information on VXLAN implementations (and other guest isolation methods)

Hello. I'm currently investigating guest isolation methods for a project. The idea was thrown about to use VXLANs, but it's rather fuzzy on how it actually is implemented. Does Cloudstack automatically create and maintain VXLAN connections, or does it ride off an already-implemented VXLAN system

Re: Information on VXLAN implementations (and other guest isolation methods)

Im aware of his blog :) good stuff really... On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 20:54, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Vincent Bernat wrote a good article about that. Highly recommend. Would be > great if CloudStack will support that: > https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/blog/2017-vxlan-bgp-evpn > > ср, 14 нояб. 2018

Re: Information on VXLAN implementations (and other guest isolation methods)

I have just single pod/subnet in a Zone so it's regular stuff, multicast... I'm also curious how this would span to multiple subnets in production - I did have a chat with my networking colleague back in the days... Cheers On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 19:45, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Andrija, cool

Re: Information on VXLAN implementations (and other guest isolation methods)

Vincent Bernat wrote a good article about that. Highly recommend. Would be great if CloudStack will support that: https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/blog/2017-vxlan-bgp-evpn ср, 14 нояб. 2018 г. в 14:37, Andrija Panic : > I have just single pod/subnet in a Zone so it's regular stuff, multicast... > >

Re: Information on VXLAN implementations (and other guest isolation methods)

Simon just explained it well - and a few additions from my side, in case it helps Read details in this page, in order to avoid some hard issues during later production (beside MTU, check the max_igmp_membership etc...) http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.11.1.0/plugins/vxlan.html Here is

Re: Information on VXLAN implementations (and other guest isolation methods)

Andrija, cool stuff. Do you run it with multicast or BGP EVPN? Looks like multicast is not the best approach for large-scale deployments. ср, 14 нояб. 2018 г. в 13:38, Andrija Panic : > Simon just explained it well - and a few additions from my side, in case it > helps > > Read details in this

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully. I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain. I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, it says Requires