Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Boris Stoyanov]

+1 

I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, I’ve 
also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking good. 

Regards, 
Bobby.


boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher  wrote:
> 
> +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
> 
> Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
> Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
> - create/use/delete system and user VMs
> - register new template
> - register service offering
> - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
> 
> Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:
> 
>> Thanks, Rohit!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Rohit Yadav 
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
>> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
>> 
>> 
>> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and
>> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
>> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of
>> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I
>> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic
>> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>> 
>> 
>> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this
>> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
>> 
>> 
>> - Rohit
>> 
>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
>> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
>> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s
>> still supported in CS 4.11.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
>> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
>> 
>> 
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
>> @shapeblue
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
>> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
>> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>> 
>> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up
>> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see
>> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in
>> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management
>> server?
>> 
>> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>> 
>> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess
>> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware...
>> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
>> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
>> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the
>> vCenter console what do you see?
>> 
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> Amadeus House, Floral Street, Lo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Gabriel Beims Bräscher]

+1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.

Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
- create/use/delete system and user VMs
- register new template
- register service offering
- work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)

Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> escreveu:

> Thanks, Rohit!
>
>
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
>
>
> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and
> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of
> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I
> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic
> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
>
>
> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this
> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> 
> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s
> still supported in CS 4.11.
>
> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
>
> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
>
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up
> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see
> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in
> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management
> server?
>
> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
>
>
>
> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess
> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware...
> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the
> vCenter console what do you see?
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tutkowski, Mike 
> Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
>
> I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.
>
> I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the
> system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.
>
> I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the
> GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade
> the template, the operation fails.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:
>
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Thanks, Rohit!



From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,


I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and could 
see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a limitation from 
the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of security group 
(host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I think nobody 
reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic zone, I've opened an 
issue for this issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031


Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this 
limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>




From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still 
supported in CS 4.11.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. 
They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the 
login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. 
Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that 
it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you 
used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the vCenter 
console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM 
template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, 
it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,


I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and could 
see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a limitation from 
the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of security group 
(host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I think nobody 
reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic zone, I've opened an 
issue for this issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031


Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this 
limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>




From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still 
supported in CS 4.11.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
  

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

I'm seeing the same thing.  VR has a guest IP, but no management IP.
If I cat /var/cache/cloud/cmdline I can see that the eth1 ip=0.0.0.0 and 
eth1mask=0.0.0.0 which is nonsense...

I'll get someone to look into it.

Thanks mike

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike  
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:58
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

The VR’s IP address was not being reported on the main GUI window, but I found 
it in the VR details (and also via ifconfig on the VR itself).

I can ping both ways successfully: From the management server to the VR and 
vice versa.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
        Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional inform

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s still 
supported in CS 4.11.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
        Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm 
template upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

   

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

The VR’s IP address was not being reported on the main GUI window, but I found 
it in the VR details (and also via ifconfig on the VR itself).

I can ping both ways successfully: From the management server to the VR and 
vice versa.

On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through 
the vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
        Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using 
the system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR 
in the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following 
artefacts up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the 
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 
16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure 
to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm 
template upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

   

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.

On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up 
fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at 
the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in 
cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I 
guess that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... 
have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the 
vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the 
system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in 
the GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade 
the template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts 
up for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th 
Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm 
template upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | 
Prev

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
I'll fire a similar build in out lab.


paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike  
Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. 
They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the 
login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. 
Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess 
that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have 
you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the 
vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system 
VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the 
GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up 
for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | 
Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | 
upgrade|

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | 
[4.11] Fix set initial r

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up fine. 
They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see it at the 
login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors in cloud.log. 
Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management server?

On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess 
that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have 
you used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the 
vCenter console what do you see?

paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike 
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system 
VM template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the 
GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links 
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is 
safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up 
for testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | 
Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | 
upgrade|

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | 
[4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Paul Angus]

I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess that 
it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware... have you 
used the 6.5 sdk ?
I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok?  If you go on the VR through the vCenter 
console what do you see? 

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike  
Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM 
template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, 
it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent 
error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | upgrade   
 |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] 
Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |  | isolation 
methods  |

+-+--+---+--++

.. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
.. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
.. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
.. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
.. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010



Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up successfully.

I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the system VM 
template specified in this e-mail chain.

I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the GUI, 
it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade the 
template, the operation fails.

Thoughts?

On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template 
upgrade section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:


+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | 
Description|

+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent 
error on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add 
missing ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | upgrade   
 |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] 
Fix set initial reservation on public IP ranges |

+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |  | isolation 
methods  |

+-+--+---+--++

.. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
.. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
.. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
.. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
.. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010



Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

[Rohit Yadav]

+1 (binding)


Verified signed source tarball, deployed a local kvm based env in advanced zone 
and was able to validate vm, volume and network lifecycles tests.


- Rohit






From: Paul Angus 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 7:29:33 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5

Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up for 
testing and a vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from 
5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template upgrade 
section has been updated.

4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/

Only the following changes have been added to RC5:

+-+--+---+--++
| Version | Github   | Type  | Priority | Description   
 |
+=+==+===+==++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3018`_ |   |  | Prevent error 
on GroupAnswers on VR creation   |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3007`_ |   |  | Add missing 
ConfigDrive entries on existing zones after|
| |  |   |  | upgrade   
 |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#2980`_ |   |  | [4.11] Fix 
set initial reservation on public IP ranges |
+-+--+---+--++
| 4.11.2.0| `#3010`_ |   |  | Fix 
DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for lowercase   |
| |  |   |  | isolation 
methods  |
+-+--+---+--++

.. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
.. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
.. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
.. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
.. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010



Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue