Hi Melanie,
I would without a doubt choose Linux bridge unless you want to use some
very special things that OVS provides - but assuming you'll be using VLANs
(or VXLANs) and considering the simplicity, stability, performance - I
would go with that.
Since XenServer is using it as the default, it h
Hi Andrija,
Am Donnerstag, den 15.08.2019, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Andrija Panic:
> One question though, why are you aiming to use OVS for KVM? i.e. why
> not regular/default Linux bridge?
I am more familiar with OpenVSwitch and I did have the impression that
is gives more configuration options for V
Hi Melanie,
actually no need to have a separate "Physical Network", unless i.e. you
decide to use VXLAN or some SDN technology for network/tenant isolation for
Guest traffic. Reason for that is since isolation method
(vlan/vxlan/etc.) is set per Physical network and affects all Traffic types
in
Hi Andrija,
Am Mittwoch, den 14.08.2019, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Andrija Panic:
> a) I assume you are planning on staying on single "Physical network"
> in ACS?
Yes. But actually I do have to admit, that I am not aware, how more
than one "Physical Network" could be set up for one zone and what that
Hi Melanie,
a) I assume you are planning on staying on single "Physical network" in ACS?
b) are you planning on reconfiguring your XenServer hosts at all (in sense
of networking) or just thinking adding KVM hosts and defining proper KMV
Traffic Label for each traffic type you have?
Makes sense to
