I have two two-node clusters set up using corosync/pacemaker on CentOS 6.8. One cluster is simply sharing an IP, while the other one has numerous services and IP's set up between the two machines in the cluster. Both appear to be working fine. However, I was poking around today, and I noticed that
I sent this a week ago, but never got a response, so I'm sending it again in the hopes that it just slipped through the cracks. It seems to me that this should just be a simple mis-configuration on my part causing the issue, but I suppose it could be a bug as well.I have two two-node clusters set u
On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On 10/04/2016 11:31 AM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> I sent this a week ago, but never got a response, so I'm sending it
>> again in the hopes that it just slipped through the cracks. It seems to
>> me that thi
On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Digimer wrote:
>
> On 04/10/16 06:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Ken Gaillot > <mailto:kgail...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/04/2016 11:31 AM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>>>> I
On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Digimer wrote:
>
> On 04/10/16 07:09 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Digimer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/10/16 06:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>>>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Ken Gaillot >>> &
END:VCARD
On Oct 4, 2016, at 4:06 PM, Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote:On 04/10/16 07:50 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote:On 04/10/16 07:09 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote:On
On Oct 5, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2016 11:56 AM, Israel Brewster wrote
>>
>>>>>>>> I never did any specific configuring of CMAN, Perhaps that's the
>>>>>>>> problem? I missed some configuration
Summary: Two-node cluster setup with latest pgsql resource agent. Postgresql starts initially, but failover never happens.Details:I'm trying to get a cluster set up with Postgresql 9.6 in a streaming replication using named slots scenario. I'm using the latest pgsql Resource Agent, which does appea
On Oct 13, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2016 12:04 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> Summary: Two-node cluster setup with latest pgsql resource agent.
>> Postgresql starts initially, but failover never happens.
>>
>> Details:
>>
>&g
On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:05:33 -0800
> Israel Brewster wrote:
>
>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2016 12:04 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:
> [...]
>
On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:39 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:11:06 -0800
> Israel Brewster wrote:
>
>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:05:33 -0800
>&
On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote:
>
> 2016-10-14 2:04 GMT+09:00 Israel Brewster :
>> Summary: Two-node cluster setup with latest pgsql resource agent. Postgresql
>> starts initially, but failover never happens.
>
>> Oct 13 08:29:47 CentTest1 pgsql(pgs
On Oct 13, 2016, at 11:36 PM, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
>>>> Israel Brewster schrieb am 13.10.2016 um 19:04 in
> Nachricht <34091524-d35e-4e28-9c3e-dda6c6a1e...@ravnalaska.net>:
> [...]
>> Oct 13 08:29:39 CentTest1 crmd[30096]: notice: State transition S_ID
>
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Keisuke MORI <mailto:keisuke.mori...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> 2016-10-14 2:04 GMT+09:00 Israel Brewster > <mailto:isr...@ravnalaska.net>>:
>>> Summary: Two-node cluster setup with latest pgsql resource agent. Pos
I have one resource agent (redis, to be exact) that sometimes apparently fails to start on the first attempt. In every case, simply running a 'pcs resource cleanup' such that pacemaker tries to start it again successfully starts the process. Now, obviously, the proper thing to do is to figure out w
I have a resource that is set up as a clone set across my cluster, partly for pseudo-load balancing (If someone wants to perform an action that will take a lot of resources, I can have them do it on a different node than the primary one), but also simply because the resource can take several second
This refers specifically to build version 5434e9646462d2c3c8f7aad2609d0ef1875839c7 of the ocf-shellfuncs file, on CentOS 6.8, so it might not be an issue on later builds (if any) or different operating systems, but it would appear that the ocf_local_nodename function can have issues with certain co
On Nov 17, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2016 11:37 AM, Israel Brewster wrote:
>> I have a resource that is set up as a clone set across my cluster,
>> partly for pseudo-load balancing (If someone wants to perform an action
>> that will take a lot
On Nov 23, 2016, at 5:49 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>
> On 18/11/16 08:22 +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> 1) is there a way to set up a "kill script", such that before trying to
>>> launch a new copy of a process, pacemaker will run this script, which would
>>> be responsible for making sure that th
Maybe I'm missing something here, and if so, my apologies, but to me it looks like you are trying to put the same IP address on three different machines SIMULTANEOUSLY. This will never work from a networking standpoint - it has nothing to do with pacemaker, etc, other than that it is responsibl
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 11:36 AM, al...@amisw.com wrote:
>
>> Maybe I'm missing something here, and if so, my apologies, but to me it
>> looks like you are trying to put the same IP address on three different
>> machines SIMULTANEOUSLY.
>
> Yes it what I do. But it's seem normal for me, I just
rom
scratch on the CentOS 7 box? I'm assuming that initially having a "single node"
cluster (until I can rebuild the other CentOS 6 box to CentOS 7) won't be an
issue.
Thanks for any input you can provide!
-------
Israel Brewster
Systems
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 19:40 +0000, Israel Brewster wrote:
>
>> If I do need to build a new CentOS cluster, how can I get it fully
>> set up with all the resources, but NOT let it start anything until I
>> per
arently not the full thing (no
resources), and it shows follow3 as offline, even though it is online and
reachable. Oddly "pcs cluster status" shows both follow1 and follow3 pcsd
status as online. What am I missing here?
-
On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Israel Brewster
mailto:ibrews...@flyravn.com>> wrote:
So in my ongoing work to upgrade my cluster to CentOS 7, I got one box up and
running on CentOS 7, with the cluster fully configured and functional, and
moved all my services over to it. Now I'm tryi
On Jan 11, 2019, at 3:53 AM, Jan Pokorný
mailto:jpoko...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 11/01/19 00:16 +, Israel Brewster wrote:
On Jan 10, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Israel Brewster
mailto:ibrews...@flyravn.com><mailto:ibrews...@flyravn.com>>
wrote:
So in my ongoing work to upgrade my
26 matches
Mail list logo
