>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 08.10.2015 um 16:13 in
Nachricht <20151008141357.GB15084@tuttle.linbit>:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'd like to report an "interesting problem" w
>>> Jorge Fábregas schrieb am 09.10.2015 um 14:20
in
Nachricht <5617b10f.1060...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to stop the excessive logging produced by the LVM monitor
> operation? I got it set at the default (30 seconds) here on SLES 11
> SP4. However, everytime it runs the DC will wri
>>> Jorge Fábregas schrieb am 09.10.2015 um 18:00
in
Nachricht <5617e49c.6060...@gmail.com>:
> On 10/09/2015 09:06 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Did you try daemon_options="-d0"? (in clvmd resource)
>
> You've nailed it Ulrich!
I still think thi
>>> "Vallevand, Mark K" schrieb am 15.10.2015 um
>>> 22:55
in Nachricht
<2f280811793d43418745268be7397...@us-exch13-5.na.uis.unisys.com>:
> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> pacemaker 1.1.10
> cman 3.1.7
> corosync 1.4.6
>
> If my cluster has no resources, it seems like it takes 20s for a stopped
> node to be
Hi!
I think the RAs' exit codes should be defined on the resource (agent)'s state
only, not on the reaction pacemaker will perform. Otherwise the idea of
universal resource agents will never work.
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> "Vallevand, Mark K" schrieb am 21.10.2015 um
16:36
in Nachricht
<6555c5b6072f4
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 22.10.2015 um 18:49 in
Nachricht <562913b5.6070...@gmail.com>:
> Let's say I have a pool of nodes and multiple services, somehow
> distributed across them. I would like to keep one node as "spare",
> without services by default, and if any of "worker" nodes fail,
>>> "Vallevand, Mark K" schrieb am 27.10.2015 um
>>> 22:24
in Nachricht
<37343dddcd2d454baaea374e80d73...@us-exch13-5.na.uis.unisys.com>:
> How do the resource placement strategy and utilization AND resource location
> preference relate?
>
> I mean, is it one or the other? Or both somehow?
I
Probably if Oracle 12 is compatible with Oracle 11, the RAs will continue to
work.
>>> "Cristiano Coltro" schrieb am 28.10.2015 um 09:45 in
Nachricht <56309953026ff...@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>:
> Hi,
> most of the SLES 11 sp3 with HAE are migrating Oracle Db.
> The migration will be from
>>> Pritam Kharat schrieb am 28.10.2015 um
>>> 09:51
in Nachricht
:
> Hi All,
>
> I am facing one issue in my two node HA. When I stop pacemaker on ACTIVE
> node, it takes more time to stop and by this time VIP migration with other
> resources migration fails to STANDBY node. (I have seen same i
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 04.11.2015 um 16:44 in
>>> Nachricht
<563a27c2.5090...@redhat.com>:
> On 11/04/2015 04:36 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
[...]
>> pid=`cat $OCF_RESKEY_pid 2> /dev/null `
>> /bin/kill $pid > /dev/null
>
> I think before this line, the RA should do a "kill
>>> zulucloud schrieb am 06.11.2015 um 12:48 in
>>> Nachricht
<563c9374.5000...@mailbox.org>:
>
> On 11/02/2015 05:59 PM, - - wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I need to be able to restart a resource (e.g apache) whenever a
>> configuration
>> file is updated. I have been using the 'crm resource restart ' c
Hi!
I wonder: It seems it does the same thing as the RA I wrote some years ago:
(crm ra info ISC-cron)
OCF Resource Agent managing crontabs for ISC cron (ocf:xola:ISC-cron)
OCF Resource Agent managing crontabs for ISC cron
This RA manages crontabs for the ISC cron daemon by managing links to spe
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 20.11.2015 um 16:06 in
>>> Nachricht
<564f36e2.90...@redhat.com>:
[...]
>> location cli-prefer-collectd collectd inf: host-1
>> location cli-prefer-failover-ip1 failover-ip1 inf: host-1
>> location cli-prefer-failover-ip2 failover-ip2 inf: host-1
>> location cli-prefer
Hi!
A few comments (Build.PL):
The part beginning at
---
$ocf_dirs = qx{
. "$lib_ocf_dirs" 2> /dev/null
echo "\$INITDIR"
...
---
is somewhat complicated. Why not do something like
---
$ocf_dirs = qx{
. "$lib_ocf_dirs" 2> /dev/null
echo "INITDIR=\$INITDIR"
...
---
and then parse the outpu
>>> Digimer schrieb am 07.12.2015 um 22:40 in Nachricht
<5665fcdc.1030...@alteeve.ca>:
[...]
> Node 1 looks up how to fence node 2, sees no delay and fences
> immediately. Node 2 looks up how to fence node 1, sees a delay and
> pauses. Node 2 will be dead long before the delay expires, ensuring th
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 08.12.2015 um 09:01 in
Nachricht
:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>>>>> Digimer schrieb am 07.12.2015 um 22:40 in Nachricht
>> <5665fcdc.1030...@alteeve.ca>:
>> [...]
>>> Node
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 08.12.2015
>>> um
09:13 in Nachricht <00a901d13190$5c6db3c0$15491b40$@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
> Digimer wrote:
>
>> >>> Should I install all vm's in one partition or every vm in a seperate
>> >>> partition ? The advantage of one vm per partition is that I don't
>>
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 08.12.2015
>>> um
13:10 in Nachricht <012101d131b1$5ec1b2e0$1c4518a0$@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
> Ulrich wrote:
>
>>
>> >>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb
>> am
>> >>> 08.12.2015 um
>> 09:13 in Nachricht <00a901d13190$5c6db3c0$15491b40$@helmholtz-
>> muenchen.de>:
>> > Di
Hi!
After updating from SLES11SP3 (june version) to SLES11SP4 (todays version)
exportfs fails to get the export status. I have message like this in syslog:
Dec 11 19:22:09 h04 crmd[11128]: notice: process_lrm_event:
rksaph04-prm_nfs_c11_mnt_exp_monitor_0:93 [
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbea
Hi!
"crm configure edit" displays the nodes section in XML like this:
xml \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
In SLES11 SP3 this was not the case...
The rest of the config is not displayed in XML, just the nodes.
Regards,
Ulrich
___
Users
Hi!
Can anybody explain what "cib[10103]: warning: cib_process_diff: Bad global
update(...)" means? I saw masses of these messages when updating a node from
SLES11SP3 to SLES11 SP4.
At the end of the block of those message there was this message:
cib[10103]:error: cib_process_diff: Diff -1.
>>> Kristoffer Grönlund schrieb am 12.12.2015 um 08:43 in
Nachricht <87io443ydc@krigpad.kri.gs>:
> Ulrich Windl writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> "crm configure edit" displays the nodes section in XML like this:
>>
>> xml \
>>\
Hi!
There is one feature in Linux that may affect you: If processes block on I/O
(NFS also), the load increases, and the load is the _sum_, and not the
_average_ of all CPUs. So if you have many CPUs, your abservable load will
typically increase. Recently we had a load of 60, but nobody actuall
]:error: crm_int_helper: Characters left over after parsing
'off': 'off'
I feel different parts of the cluster stack have different expectations on the
syntax...
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 14.12.2015 um 08:22 in Nachricht <566E6E49.49E :
161 :
Hi!
I have two scenarios where I could need help from the experts:
1) For a master/slave resource, is it possible to stop just the master or slave
(and let the cluster do the recovery)? For clone resources the failed
operations get suffixes like ":0", ":1", ... Would it work with master/slave
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 16.12.2015
>>> um
00:35 in Nachricht
<1621336773.386234.1450222516246.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
[...]
> What is about a quorum disk ? I also read about "tiebrakers" or that STONITH
> is magically able to chosse the right
> node to fence (i can't beli
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 16.12.2015
>>> um
13:31 in Nachricht
<1496952480.528507.1450269100369.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
> Ulrich wrote:
>
> - On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Ulrich Windl
> ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de
>>> Michal Koutný schrieb am 16.12.2015 um 13:43 in
Nachricht
<56715c56.60...@suse.com>:
> Hi Oleg.
>
> On 12/16/2015 11:31 AM, Oleg Ilyin wrote:
>> So, main point of my issue is jobs = 1
>>
>> Please, does it possibly to increase number of jobs through throttle
high?
> The parameter you are
>>> Klechomir schrieb am 16.12.2015 um 17:30 in Nachricht
<5671918e.40...@gmail.com>:
> On 16.12.2015 17:52, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> On 12/16/2015 02:09 AM, Klechomir wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>> I have a cluster with VM resources on a cloned active-active storage.
>>>
>>> VirtualDomain resource migrates
es. config will help solving the problem.
You could send logs with the actual startup sequence then.
>
> Regards,
> KIecho
>
> On 17.12.2015 08:19:43 Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> >>> Klechomir schrieb am 16.12.2015 um 17:30 in Nachricht
>>
>> <5671918e.40...@gm
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 21.12.2015 um 11:40 in
Nachricht <20151221104011.GB9783@walrus.homenet>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 07:27:28PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> After updating from SLES11SP3 (june version) to SLES11SP4 (to
Hi!
Simple question (SLES11 SP3): I have set migration-threshold=1 and it seems to
work.
Now I tried to stop two resources that are "Migration enabled". I found out
that the stop for the second resource was delayed until the first one
acknowledged the stop. Is this a side-effect of migration-th
>>> Somanath Jeeva schrieb am 23.12.2015 um 06:01
>>> in
Nachricht <4f5e5141ed95ff45b3128f3c7b1b2a6721abe...@eusaamb109.ericsson.se>:
> Hi ,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> I will check with our IT team regarding the multicast MAC at switch level.
>
> But the Virtual IP is reachable for 15
Hi!
When trying to migrate a clone resource I got this (SLES11 SP4 with
crmsh-2.1.2+git49.g2e3fa0e-1.32):
# crm resource migrate cln_ctdb PT5M
Resource 'cln_ctdb' not moved: active in 2 locations.
You can prevent 'cln_ctdb' from running on a specific location with: --ban
--host
Error performing
>>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 28.12.2015 um 09:17 in Nachricht <5680F025.9B2 :
>>> 161 :
60728>:
> Hi!
>
> When trying to migrate a clone resource I got this (SLES11 SP4 with
> crmsh-2.1.2+git49.g2e3fa0e-1.32):
> # crm resource migrate cln_ctdb PT5M
>
Hi!
I put a resource into maintenance mode using "crm resource maintenance ".
After a while I tried to undo it by trying "crm resource manage ", but
that did not have any effect; I had to use "crm resource maintenance off".
So may I ask what is the difference between both variants?
Regards,
Ul
Hi!
I would expect if you set the cpu utilization per primitive (used in clone) to
one and set the cpu capacity per node to the correct number that no node has
more primitives than the cpu number allows and that primitives are distributed
among all available nodes. Isn't that true in your case?
W
>>> Somanath Jeeva schrieb am 30.12.2015 um 11:34
>>> in
Nachricht <4f5e5141ed95ff45b3128f3c7b1b2a6721abf...@eusaamb109.ericsson.se>:
> On 12/22/2015 08:09 AM, Somanath Jeeva wrote:
>> Hi
>> I am trying to use ip loadbalancing using cloning feature in pacemaker. but
> After 15 min the virtual ip
>>> Jorge Fábregas schrieb am 30.12.2015 um 17:53
in
Nachricht <56840c21.1050...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> We're having some issues with a particular oversubscribed hypervisor
> (cpu-wise) where we run SLES 11 SP4 guests. I had to increase many
> timeouts on the cluster to cope with this:
Hi!
(I'm
>>> Daniel Hernández schrieb am 30.12.2015 um 19:43 in
Nachricht
:
> On 12/30/15, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I would expect if you set the cpu utilization per primitive (used in
clone)
>> to
>> one and set the cpu capacity per node to the correct
>>> Digimer schrieb am 11.01.2016 um 17:59 in Nachricht
<5693df77.7000...@alteeve.ca>:
> Hi all,
>
> We hit a strange problem where a RAID controller on a node failed,
> causing DLM (gfs2/clvmd) to hang, but the node was never fenced. I
> assume this was because corosync was still working.
I w
Hi!
Since an update of sbd in SLES11 SP4 (sbd-1.2.1-0.12.1), I see frequent syslog
messages like these (grep "Watchdog enabled." /var/log/messages):
Jan 13 00:01:01 h02 sbd: [19373]: info: Watchdog enabled.
Jan 13 00:01:01 h02 sbd: [19380]: info: Watchdog enabled.
Jan 13 00:04:02 h02 sbd: [21740]
Hi!
We asre using a ldirectord configuration that uses an external-perl to check
for connections. That worked in SLES11SP3, but I just discovered that IPVS
thinks all real services are up, when in fact the perl module reports they are
down.
Could this be due to some bad change?
Trying to debug
Hi!
I have a proposal for future release announcements:
Can you include the corresponding help texts for new features (where new
features are mentioned)?
That would have two advantages:
1) One better understands what the feature is about
2) One can quickly give feedback if the (new) help text is
Hi!
I have a question (for SLES11 SP4 with current updates):
Is it a feature that maintenance mode turn off when you do a rcopenais
stop/start?
I had turned maintenance mode on, stopped both nodes of a cluster (rcopenais
stop). Then, when I started the node that was DC before, maintenance mode w
m /var/lib/heartbeat/crm to /var/lib/pacemaker/cib/ while the node was
active. As the move was within one filesystem, that really shouldn't have hurt
much...
Regards,
Ulrich Windl
>>> "Ulrich Windl" schrieb am 27.01.2016 um
13:42 in Nachricht <56a8c95802a10001
>>> Kyle O'Donnell schrieb am 04.02.2016 um 14:17 in Nachricht
<124846465.11794.1454591851253.javamail.zim...@0b10.mx>:
[...]
> I had:
> location cli-prefer-tome tome_kvm inf: ny4j1-kvm02
>
> removed that and I am all good!
[...]
That's why I ALWAYS specify a time when migrating resources. So i
ference/priority (lower=higher prior)?
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Ulrich Windl"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 8:47:23 AM
> Subject: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: kvm live migration, resource moving
>
>>>> Kyle O'Donn
Hi!
I guess it's hard to guess what the cluster will do when you remove constraints.
Maybe adding a keyword like "delete --no-wait ..." moves the risk to the
operator...
However I'm not quite sure I understood your problem fully.
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> Vladislav Bogdanov schrieb am 08.02.2016 um
>>> Digimer schrieb am 08.02.2016 um 20:03 in Nachricht
<56b8e68a.1060...@alteeve.ca>:
> On 08/02/16 01:56 PM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>> Ken Gaillot writes:
>>
>>> On 02/07/2016 12:21 AM, G Spot wrote:
>>>
Thanks for your response, am using ocf:pacemaker:controld resource
agent and stoni
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 09.02.2016 um 20:58 in
Nachricht <20160209195816.GD2437@walrus.homenet>:
[...]
>> Particularly, imho RAs should not run validate_all on stop
>> action.
>
> I'd disagree here. If the environment is no good (bad
> installation, missing configuration and similar), th
>>> Vladislav Bogdanov schrieb am 10.02.2016 um 05:39 in
Nachricht <6e479808-6362-4932-b2c6-348c7efc4...@hoster-ok.com>:
[...]
> Well, I'd reword. Generally, RA should not exit with error if validation
> fails on stop.
> Is that better?
[...]
As we have different error codes, what type of error
>>> Ferenc Wágner schrieb am 10.02.2016 um 11:56 in Nachricht
<87mvr8n896@lant.ki.iif.hu>:
> Vladislav Bogdanov writes:
>
>> If pacemaker has got an error on start, it will run stop with the same
>> set of parameters anyways. And will get error again if that one was
>> from validation and RA
>>> Digimer schrieb am 10.02.2016 um 17:32 in Nachricht
<56bb6637.6090...@alteeve.ca>:
> On 10/02/16 02:40 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
>>> If fencing fails or is not configured, DLM never unblocks and anything
>>> using it is left hung (by design,
>>> "Bernie Jones" schrieb am 20.02.2016 um
13:50 in Nachricht <000601d16bdd$372178e0$a5646aa0$@ltd.uk>:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I'm new to this list and fairly new to pacemaker and have just spent a
> couple of days trying unsuccessfully to solve a configuration challenge.
>
>
>
> I have seen a
>>> Cristiano Coltro schrieb am 22.02.2016 um
09:29 in Nachricht
:
> Hi All,
> A customer of mine is searching the smmothest way to migrate an envinronment
> SLES for SAP 11 sp2 to SLES for SAP 11 sp3.
May I ask why they want to go to SP3 now when SP4 is out for months?
Regards,
Ulrich
_
>>> Ferenc Wágner schrieb am 08.03.2016 um 15:08 in Nachricht
<87wppdoydv@lant.ki.iif.hu>:
> Ken Gaillot writes:
>
>> On 03/07/2016 02:03 PM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>>
>>> The transition-keys match, does this mean that the above is a late
>>> result from the monitor operation which was conside
>>> Ferenc Wágner schrieb am 16.03.2016 um 13:47 in Nachricht
<87k2l2zj0n@lant.ki.iif.hu>:
[...]
> Then I wonder why I hear the "must have working fencing if you value
> your data" mantra so often (and always without explanation). After all,
> it does not risk the data, only the automatic clu
>>> Matthew Mucker schrieb am 16.03.2016 um 23:10 in
>>> Nachricht
[...]
> So thinking this through logically, it seems to me that the Openstack
> docs were wrong in telling me to configure MariaDB server to bind to all
> available ports
In a cluster environment with virtual IP addresse
>>> Christopher Harvey schrieb am 16.03.2016 um 21:04 in Nachricht
<1458158684.122207.551267810.11f73...@webmail.messagingengine.com>:
[...]
>> > Would stonith solve this problem, or does this look like a bug?
>>
>> It should, that is its job.
>
> is there some log I can enable that would say
>
>>> Lorand Kelemen schrieb am 18.03.2016 um 16:42 in
Nachricht
:
> I reviewed all the logs, but found nothing out of the ordinary, besides the
> "resource cannot run anywhere" line, however after the cluster recheck
> interval expired the services started fine without any suspicious log
> entries.
>>> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn schrieb am 19.03.2016 um
>>> 14:32 in
Nachricht <56ed5507.7070...@conversis.de>:
> On 17.03.2016 08:45, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Mike Bernhardt wrote:
>>> I guess I have to say "never mind!" I don't know what the problem was
>>> yester
>>> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn schrieb am 19.03.2016 um
>>> 15:10 in
Nachricht <56ed5dc4.9080...@conversis.de>:
[...]
> I think the key issue here is that people think about corosync they
> believe there can only be two state for membership (true or false) when
> in reality there are three possible s
visd: migration-threshold=1 fail-count=1 last-failure='Mon Mar 21
> 10:00:53 2016'
>
> Failed Actions:
> * amavisd_monitor_6 on mail2 'not running' (7): call=2604,
> status=complete, exitreason='none',
> last-rc-change='Mon Mar 21 10:00:5
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 21.03.2016 um 15:22 in
>>> Nachricht
<56f003b0.4020...@redhat.com>:
[...]
> It's actually newer pacemaker versions rather than pcs itself. Fence
> agents do not need to be cloned, or even running -- as long as they're
> configured and enabled, any node can use the reso
>>> Kristoffer Grönlund schrieb am 22.03.2016 um 09:40 in
Nachricht <87lh5ahpmr@krigpad.kri.gs>:
> Jan Pokorný writes:
>
>> Hmm, I keep lamenting that by extending agents metadata with inline
>> RelaxNG grammar to express co-occurrence/mutual exclusion of
>> particular parameters and/or its
Hi!
Actually form my SLES11 SP[1-4] experience, the cluster always distributes
resources across all available nodes, and only if don't want that, I'll have to
add constraints. I wonder why that does not seem to work for you.
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> Ferenc Wágner schrieb am 02.04.2016 um 10:28 in Na
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 07.04.2016 um 00:04 in
Nachricht
<57058805.8050...@redhat.com>:
> On 03/30/2016 12:18 PM, Sam Gardner wrote:
>> I'll check about the cluster-recheck-interval. Attached is a crm_report.
>>
>> In the meantime, what is all performed on that interval? The Red Hat docs
>> sa
>>> Robert Dahlem schrieb am 08.04.2016 um 12:37 in
Nachricht <570789f9.4040...@gmx.net>:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the process of updating my SUSE SLES 11 system from SP3 to SP4.
Did you install updates also? (e.g. crmsh-2.1.2+git132.gbc9fde0-7.2)
>
> This involves some version changes:
> crmsh
>>> Ferenc Wágner schrieb am 18.04.2016 um 17:07 in Nachricht
<87a8krx8e7@lant.ki.iif.hu>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the "balanced" placement strategy with good success. It
> distributes our VM resources according to memory size perfectly.
> However, I'd like to take the NUMA topology into account
>>> Ferenc Wágner schrieb am 19.04.2016 um 13:42 in Nachricht
<87y489x1s2.fsf...@lant.ki.iif.hu>:
> "Ulrich Windl" writes:
>
>> Ferenc Wágner schrieb am 18.04.2016 um 17:07 in Nachricht
>>
>>> I'm using the "balanced" placeme
Hi!
I'm wondering: If you boot a node on a cluster, most resources will go to
another node (if possible). Due to stickiness configured, those resources will
stay there.
So I'm wondering whether or how I could cause a rebalance of resources on the
cluster. I must admit that I don't understand th
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 20.04.2016 um 16:44 in
>>> Nachricht
<571795e5.4090...@redhat.com>:
> On 04/20/2016 01:17 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm wondering: If you boot a node on a cluster, most resources will go to
> another no
>>> Tomas Jelinek schrieb am 21.04.2016 um 10:20 in
>>> Nachricht
<57188d6b.5020...@redhat.com>:
> Dne 21.4.2016 v 08:56 Ulrich Windl napsal(a):
>>>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 20.04.2016 um 16:44 in
>>>>> Nachricht
>> <571795e5.4
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 21.04.2016 um 19:50 in
>>> Nachricht
<571912f3.2060...@redhat.com>:
[...]
> The alerts section can have any number of alerts, which look like:
>
> path="/srv/pacemaker/pcmk_alert_sample.sh">
>
> value="/var/log/cluster-alerts.log
>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb am 25.04.2016 um 12:12 in
Nachricht
<20160425101236.gd10...@suse.de>:
> On 2016-04-25T10:10:38, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
>
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> I can't really comment on why the cLVM2 is slow (somewhat surprisingly,
> because floc
>>> Kristoffer Grönlund schrieb am 27.04.2016 um 12:12 in
Nachricht <87twinl5sb@krigpad.kri.gs>:
> Ken Gaillot writes:
>
>> The most prominent feature will be Klaus Wenninger's new implementation
>> of event-driven alerts -- the ability to call scripts whenever
>> interesting events occur (n
Hi!
I wonder: would passing the CIB generation (like 1.6.122) or a (local?) event
sequence number to the notification script (SNMP trap) help?
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> Klaus Wenninger schrieb am 27.04.2016 um 20:14 in
Nachricht <57210183.6050...@redhat.com>:
> On 04/27/2016 04:19 PM, renayama19661.
>>> Rafal Sanocki schrieb am 04.05.2016 um 14:14 in
Nachricht <78d882b1-a407-31e0-2b9e-b5f8406d4...@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
> I cant find what i did wrong. I have 2 node cluster, Corosync ,Pacemaker
> , DRBD . When i plug out cable nothing happend.
"nothing"? The wrong cable?
[...]
Regards,
Ulri
>>> Christopher Fogarty schrieb am
>>> 09.05.2016 um
17:54 in Nachricht <4c41e827a2b5457ab06160db63bdd...@sveexch01.versiant.net>:
> I am getting this error message
>
> data_vol (ocf::heartbeat:LVM): Started node1
> ClusterIP (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started node1
> KahaDB_FS
>>> Mohammed Alam schrieb am 09.05.2016 um 08:17 in
>>> Nachricht
:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading Andrew Beekhof's blog (particularly this article:
> http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2015/sbd-fun-and-profit/) and became very
> interested in setting up a cluster using SBD fencing on a shared FCOE
> sto
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 10.05.2016 um 00:40 in
>>> Nachricht
<573111d3.7060...@redhat.com>:
> On 05/04/2016 11:47 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> On 05/04/2016 08:49 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
On 05/04/2016 02:09 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discus
Hi!
I think I found this bug in crm shell (crmsh-2.1.2+git132.gbc9fde0-7.2):
When defining a new primitive, required parameters are not checked (I'm using
my own RA, but any RA should do):
--
crm(live)configure# primitive bad ocf:xola:iotwatch
crm(live)configure#
--
But when I edit the primiti
Hi!
I have a long-standing question: What are the rules for formatting a primitive
in crm shell?
It seems operations are put on separate lines, but parameters are not (The
problem is more clear on non-wide terminals like 80 columns).
I think having parameters on separate lines would help readabi
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 10.05.2016 um 19:24 in
Nachricht <20160510172423.GA26066@walrus.homenet>:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:51:19PM +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
>> Ulrich Windl writes:
>>
>> > Hi!
>> >
>>
Hi!
I think the solution is switching from sequential dependencies in groups to
parallel dependencies, separating in ordering and colocation
In crm shell it is displayed as "order any inf: first ( then1 then2 )" and
"colocation any inf: ( then11 then2 ) first".
Would this help? We had a similar
>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb am 11.05.2016 um 16:13 in
>>> Nachricht
<20160511141305.gi...@suse.de>:
> On 2016-05-11T08:02:56, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>
>> > $ crm help Checks
>> > $ crm options help check-frequency
>> > $ crm option
Hi!
I have a question regarding an RA written by myself and pacemaker
1.1.12-f47ea56 (SLES11 SP4):
During "probe" all resources' "monitor" actions are executed (regardless of any
ordering constraints). Therefore my RA considers a parameter as invalid ("file
does not exist") (the file will be p
Hi!
Excuse me for asking something somewhat off-topic: We are running some Xen PVMs
on SLES11 SP4, and I noticed from time to time what looks like a 64-bit
overflow in VBD_RSECT. I think I had addressed this issue once before with
support, but without success (memory may be wrong). I'd simply l
>>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 09:56 in Nachricht <5734373F.4DE :
>>> 161 :
60728>:
> Hi!
>
> I have a question regarding an RA written by myself and pacemaker
> 1.1.12-f47ea56 (SLES11 SP4):
>
> During "probe" all resources&#
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 16:41 in
>>> Nachricht
<57349629.40...@redhat.com>:
> On 05/12/2016 02:56 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have a question regarding an RA written by myself and pacemaker
> 1.1.12-f47ea56 (SLES11 SP4
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 13.05.2016 um 12:16 in
Nachricht <20160513101626.GA12493@walrus.homenet>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:05:54AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> >>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 16:41 in
>> >>> N
Hi!
One of the main problems I identified with POSIX shared memory (/dev/shm) in
Linux is that changes to the shared memory don't affect the i-node, so you
cannot tell from a "ls -rtl" which segments are still active and which are not.
You can only see the creation time.
Maybe there should be
Hi!
I tried to move a primitive away from a node with crm shell:
crm resource migrate clone PT5M
This results in the message:
Resource 'clone' not moved: active in 2 locations.
You can prevent 'clone' from running on a specific location with: --ban --host
However when I tried it on host "node
is a node from a three-node cliuster (SLES11 SP4), with no tuning applied
to SHM sizes:
# df /dev/shm
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
tmpfs220 73368 2037752 4% /dev/shm
Regards,
Ulrich
>
> Thanks
> Nikhil
>
> On Tue, May 17, 201
>>> Kristoffer Grönlund schrieb am 17.05.2016 um 14:51 in
Nachricht <87d1okkftm@krigpad.kri.gs>:
> Ulrich Windl writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I tried to move a primitive away from a node with crm shell:
>>
>> crm resource migrate clone PT5M
&g
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 17.05.2016 um 16:53 in
>>> Nachricht
<573b3074.1040...@redhat.com>:
> On 05/17/2016 04:07 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
>> What I would like to understand is how much total shared memory
>> (approximately) would Pacemaker need so that accordingly I can define
>> the partition
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 17.05.2016 um 19:23 in
>>> Nachricht
<573b537a.1080...@redhat.com>:
> On 05/17/2016 12:02 PM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
>> OK. Will do that.
>>
>> Actually I gave the /dev/shm usage when the cluster wasn't up.
>> When it is up, I see it occupies close to 300 MB (it's also th
>>> Dharmesh schrieb am 19.05.2016 um 13:18 in
>>> Nachricht
:
> Hi,
>
> i am having a 2 node Debian cluster with resources configured in it.
> Everything is working fine apart from one thing.
Usually you find the reasons in the logs (syslog, cluster log, etc.).
>
> As and when one of my two
>>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais schrieb am 19.05.2016 um
>>> 21:29 in
Nachricht <20160519212947.6cc0fd7b@firost>:
[...]
> I was thinking of a use case where a graceful demote or stop action failed
> multiple times and to give a chance to the RA to choose another method to
> stop
> the resource b
1 - 100 of 1502 matches
Mail list logo
