>>> Ferenc Wágner <[email protected]> schrieb am 19.04.2016 um 13:42 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> writes: > >> Ferenc Wágner <[email protected]> schrieb am 18.04.2016 um 17:07 in Nachricht >> >>> I'm using the "balanced" placement strategy with good success. It >>> distributes our VM resources according to memory size perfectly. >>> However, I'd like to take the NUMA topology into account. That means >>> each host should have several capacity pools (of each capacity type) to >>> arrange the resources in. Can Pacemaker do something like this? >> >> I think you can, but depending on VM technology, the hypervisor may >> not care much about NUMA. More details? > > The NUMA technology would be handled by the resource agent, if it was > told by Pacemaker which utilization zone to use on its host. I just > need the policy engine to do more granular resource placement and > communicate the selected zone to the resource agents on the hosts. > > I'm pretty sure there's no direct support for this, but there might be > different approaches I missed. Thus I'm looking for ideas here.
My initial idea was this: Define a memory resource for every NUMA pool on each host, the assign your resources to NUMA pools (utilization): The resources will pick some host, but when one pool is full, your resources cannot go to another pool. Is something like this what you wanted? > -- > Thanks, > Feri > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list: [email protected] > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
