On 2/1/07, ricardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:35:42 -0500 (EST)
Justin C. Sherrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, January 31, 2007 3:18 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I am seriously considering our options with regards to ZFS or a
ZFS-like filesystem. We
j s wrote:
Here's the error. I have attempted building several times including
from a cleaned /usr/src and cvsup with tag=. and
tag=DragonFly_RELEASE_1_8_Slip
cc -O -pipe -mtune=pentiumpro
-I/usr/src/secure/libexec/sftp-server/../../lib/libssh
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Besides the finalization of vkernel, what else can we expect into 2.0? There
are many long-awaited (not only by me) features and additions:
:- ZFS
I am seriously considering our options with regards to ZFS or a
ZFS-like filesystem. We clearly need something to
Hi all,
Following is a patch updating ath(4) to the latest hal:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/ath0.9.20.3.diff
This patch is against src/sys
For HEAD users, this patch should be applied cleanly.
For 1.8 users, you probably need to apply following patch first:
Nigel Weeks wrote:
Just an idea for thought over your next coffee...
I'm if it would be to conceivably possible to move a vkernel process(and any
sub-processes it had) to another host? It'd have to stop temporarily, or at
least, slow down immensely while pumping all the userland data inside the
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:10:21PM -0800, j s wrote:
cc -O -pipe -mtune=pentiumpro
-I/usr/src/secure/libexec/sftp-server/../../lib/libssh
-I/usr/src/secure/libexec/sftp-server/../../../crypto/openssh-4
-L/usr/pkg/lib -o sftp-server sftp-server.o sftp-common.o -lssh
You have
On 2/1/07, Sascha Wildner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
j s wrote:
Here's the error. I have attempted building several times including
from a cleaned /usr/src and cvsup with tag=. and
tag=DragonFly_RELEASE_1_8_Slip
snip
Hm, how do you build? Do you have other settings in make.conf?
I'm not
On Thu, February 1, 2007 3:20 am, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
That's not his point. He means that ZFS, while very good at what it
is, would not be optimal for transparent clustering. And a file system
which is designed for clustering won't necessarily be as good as ZFS
on single machines. Either
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
It's a moot point until Matt can evaluate modifying existing filesystems
vs building a new one, though. I don't want NIH-ism to get in the way of
having something neat, though
Yah. I think porting ZFS and possibly inventing a new FS or pimping up ZFS can
run in
Reading the list about vkernel, clustering and file system I've began to
wonder.
How on earth can you make a cluster without paying for the extreme
overhead for locking everything?
Is it a question of locking more specific or is there some 'magical'
technology that helps you out of that.
:Reading the list about vkernel, clustering and file system I've began to
:wonder.
:
:How on earth can you make a cluster without paying for the extreme
:overhead for locking everything?
:
:Is it a question of locking more specific or is there some 'magical'
:technology that helps you out of
On 2/1/07, Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yah. I think porting ZFS and possibly inventing a new FS or pimping up ZFS can
run in parallel and thus ZFS _should_ be done.
cheers
simon
Yes, I second that. Maybe ZFS could be improved to handle the problems
Matt listed. And
On 2/1/07, YONETANI Tomokazu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:10:21PM -0800, j s wrote:
cc -O -pipe -mtune=pentiumpro
You have something similar to this
LDFLAGS=-L/usr/pkg/lib
in /etc/make.conf? Try commenting out, or use a custom make.conf
only for
2007/1/31, Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am seriously considering our options with regards to ZFS or a
ZFS-like filesystem. We clearly need something to replace UFS,
but I am a bit worried that porting ZFS would be as much work
as simply designing a new filesystem from
Chris Csanady wrote:
very well-thought-out post in re ZFS. Thanks!
I'd only add that porting one or more 'foreign' fs in general seem to be a good
idea - it is bound to show up things not yet covered well.
In all of the published comparison tests, I have never seen a single 'always
best' fs
Dmitri Nikulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What? Opening this e-mail is acceptance of the terms specified in
this e-mail?
Not exactly, according to what I read. Nevertheless it's pretty
unenforcable, for the same reasons you can't stop spam.
A great example is already in DragonFly - process
I regularly make use of jail in FreeBSD for hosting virtual servers
(typically for application development and testing, and infrastructure
server configuration testing).
One thing I have always found frustrating is the inability to set up a
additional network interfaces on the machine so that
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
One thing I have always found frustrating is the inability to set up a
additional network interfaces on the machine so that they can be
dedicated to the jailed servers, in such a way that all the host's
network traffic stays on the primary interface, and all the jail's
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Jeffrey Williams wrote:
One thing I have always found frustrating is the inability to set up
a additional network interfaces on the machine so that they can be
dedicated to the jailed servers, in such a way that all the host's
network traffic stays on the
19 matches
Mail list logo
