CPUTYPE and gcc optimizations

Hey everyone, I'm wondering if its good o set CPUTYPE for extra optimization, or if its ok to set any other extra compiler optimizations other than the default. Thanks, Petr

Re: CPUTYPE and gcc optimizations

It depends whether it appears to speed up the code you are compiling up or not! And the only way you will know this is if you try it. Although benchmarks tend to lie anyway and magic bullets not exist. The best way of doing this, at least for packages, would be to port

Re: CPUTYPE and gcc optimizations

Petr Janda wrote: Hey everyone, I'm wondering if its good o set CPUTYPE for extra optimization, or if its ok to set any other extra compiler optimizations other than the default. Thanks, Petr good page! http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags best regards, Alexander

Re: CPUTYPE and gcc optimizations

Petr Janda wrote: I'm wondering if its good o set CPUTYPE for extra optimization, or if its ok to set any other extra compiler optimizations other than the default. don't set -march/-mtune + -O2/-Os with gcc3.4 and stack protector, it produces bad code. normal -O is fine, though. cheers

ral(4) PCMCIA / cbb problem

Hello (again) Having scrapped my dodgy D-Link ath(4) based card, I am now trying an MSI CardBus CB54G2 card. It attaches but 'dmesg | grep ral' says: Preloaded elf module /modules/if_ral.ko at 0xc050245c. ral0: Ralink Technology RT2560 mem 0x88002000-0x88003fff irq 11 at device 0.0 on

Re: ral(4) PCMCIA / cbb problem

On 2/12/07, Ja'far Railton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello (again) Having scrapped my dodgy D-Link ath(4) based card, I am now trying an MSI CardBus CB54G2 card. It attaches but 'dmesg | grep ral' says: Preloaded elf module /modules/if_ral.ko at 0xc050245c. ral0: Ralink Technology RT2560 mem