It seems apache has some bad CDNs as I can access 3.3.0 from another
> > location.
> >
> > I'm hoping the Felix project can escalate to Apache's infra team.
> >
> > Denis
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/04/17 01:53 PM, James Carman wrote:
> > > Is anyon
Is anyone else having troubles with trying to upgrade to 3.3.0? When I try
to use it I get:
Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:3.3.0 or one of its dependencies could
not be resolved: Could not find artifact
org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:jar:3.3.0 in
Maybe you guys can help with something. For some folks, this URL:
http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix/maven-bundle-plugin/3.3.0/maven-bundle-plugin-3.3.0.jar
comes back with a 404, meaning they can't use the 3.3.0 version of the
plugin with Maven. Did we perhaps have a messed up
04 for me but also maven.org is run by Sonatype so
> queries about that service should go to them.
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:42 AM, James Carman
> <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> > Maybe you guys can help with something. For some folks, this URL:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I just tested it from here (germany) :
> >>
> >>
> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix/maven-bundle-plugin/3.3.0/maven-bundle-plugin-3.3.0.jar
> >> it starts downloading the jar file ...
> >>
> >> Kind rega
Looks like it is working now. Thanks again, Brian!
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:28 PM James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
wrote:
> I'll give it a whirl when I get back home. It's "Dad's Taxi" time. Thanks,
> Brian!
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:20 PM Brian Fox &
Give it a try now. Many thanks to Brian Fox for helping us out and fixing
the issue!
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:59 AM Pat Colangelo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have found that version 3.3.0 of the maven-bundle-plugin is missing from
> maven central. I am only able to
Yep, I brought this up on 4/21 and someone else brought it up before me.
Perhaps we should file a JIRA with the infrastructure folks to see if they
can help us get things back in order?
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:59 AM Pat Colangelo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have found
jcarman-mbp-2:~ jcarman$ wget
http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix/maven-bundle-plugin/3.3.0/maven-bundle-plugin-3.3.0.jar
--2017-05-09 11:04:59--
http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix/maven-bundle-plugin/3.3.0/maven-bundle-plugin-3.3.0.jar
Resolving central.maven.org...
No, I'm not behind a proxy. I'm at my house. This only seems to be a
problem for certain folks. Very strange. Listing the directory works
fine, but trying to hit the JAR file itself 404's. Using version 3.2.0
works fine.
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:03 AM Carsten Ziegeler
Presumably, you'd also have your SCM system standing watch. You shouldn't
be able to recreate tags, for instance, and any good release process should
include tagging of your released artifacts. Obviously, someone can delete
tags, but that should be frowned upon.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:54 PM
Yes, sorry, was on the road before. It uses semantic versioning to
determine what matches and 7.24.1 is much less (99 less) than 7.24.100. It
doesn’t compare them lexicographically. It treats each section as an
integer.
Are you using the maven bundle plugin? If not, you should be. It, for a
It appears that the maven-bundle-plugin does not include files in the
target/classes/META-INF/ directory when it builds the resulting jar
file. Is there some configuration I can use to force it to include
those files? We have some ServiceLoader service definitions,
generated by the Immutables
Regards
> JB
>
> On 15/03/2019 18:27, James Carman wrote:
> > It appears that the maven-bundle-plugin does not include files in the
> > target/classes/META-INF/ directory when it builds the resulting jar
> > file. Is there some configuration I can use to force it to
agree it’s a bug?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 3:03 PM nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't you hack it using the resource plugin? I know its not using the
> Bundle Plugin..
>
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019, 18:27 James Carman,
> wrote:
>
> > It appear
Unless you really need to be “down and dirty” with OSGi, lots of folks opt
for using Apache Karaf, which is based on Felix (by default). It takes
care of a lot of the heavy lifting for you automatically. If you really
want to learn the insides and outs, though, stick with Felix, but you’ll
want
s for a Java client application that I want to
> update automatically on a periodic basis.
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:41 AM James Carman
> wrote:
>
> > Unless you really need to be “down and dirty” with OSGi, lots of folks
> opt
> > for using Apache Karaf, which
ith the original problem, as Karl is
> trying to do.
>
> Neil
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 3:16 PM James Carman
> wrote:
>
> > People run karaf on Raspberry Pi devices. It can be quite small.
> > What are your requirements on resources?
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1
18 matches
Mail list logo