Ok, poking around the source for VariableScopeVisitor didn't provide me
with any insights. It did lead me to try
VariableScopeVisitor scopeVisitor = new VariableScopeVisitor( source, true)
but I still get the error:
BUG! exception in phase 'class generation' in source unit
cNode is a closure's classNode?
Cheers, Paul.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Ed Clark <eacl...@ameritech.net> wrote:
Ok, a little more headbanging and I seem to have gotten farther (maybe?).
At least the error message has changed. Now I'm getting:
BUG! exception in phase 'class gene
f your closure(s)? Where cNode is a closure's classNode?
Cheers, Paul.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Ed Clark <eacl...@ameritech.net> wrote:
Ok, a little more headbanging and I seem to have gotten farther (maybe?).
At least the error message has changed. Now I'm getting:
BUG! exception in pha
though I am not sure we really use it.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Ed Clark <eacl...@ameritech.net> wrote:
I can report progress. Turns out there were two problems.
The error message that I was getting concerning : "="
not being supported had to do with how I
lean up my remaining problem with scoping issues.
Yeah!
On to the next wall, how to generate a table of method signatures (at transform
time)
for all the methods defined in the user written classes (marked with my
annotation)...
Many thanks,
Ed
On 02/20/2017 12:06 PM, Ed Clark wrote
On 02/14/2017 12:16 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 14.02.2017 12:41, Ed Clark wrote:
Hi Jochen,
Well, I've been slowly making progress on this; kind of feels like
bashing my
head against a wall at times, but I have made a small hole in the wall
through
which I can see my goal. ;-)
making
ead banging hasn't helped either. :\
Any illuminating insight, or direction pointing, or example would be greatly
appreciated!
Thanks
Ed
On 12/31/2016 06:36 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 31.12.2016 17:32, Ed Clark wrote:
[...]
Assuming you still want to do something like this with more...
On 01/19/2017 08:44 AM, sterg wrote:
On 01/19/2017 03:39 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 19.01.2017 12:57, sterg wrote:
Hi all,
a user reported me, that GroovyLab
(https://github.com/sterglee/GroovyLab)
fails silently at startup, at his platform.
no error at all?
yes, with no error
(with ctx2 chaining to ctx3 chaining to Ctx1 above), but is
there
a better way?
- what might I be breaking in Groovy by doing this?
- what help/hints can I get from the compiler vs. doing this all at runtime?
Thanks for your time,
Ed Clark
bleExpression) making up the subtrees for the two lines.
Obviously I'm doing something wrong. But I can't see what it is.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Ed Clark
Hi Jochen,
Thanks for getting back to me. Responses inline.
On 07/12/2017 02:02 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 11.07.2017 22:07, Ed Clark wrote:
[...]
the browser shows a post-xform output of:
sum = myCtx.multiply( le, re) <--- this executes
sum = myCtx.multiply(
11 matches
Mail list logo
