I say 3.
(I may be alone on this one, but I'd even suggest to consider some of
the Java syntax compatibility, if this helps speed up Groovy 3. If I
need to write Java code, I can always put it in .java files.)
Haakon Hansen
Den 2018-06-13 10:08, skrev Mario Garcia:
I would say 3 as well
I did come from Java myself, and I understand the argument to ease the
transition from Java to Groovy, but as Java adopts language features
from Groovy, I worry that supporting both syntaxes will create a more
complex language with more options, more stuff to learn, and less
clarity.
Besides,
Bloated, is the word I was looking for...
Den 2018-06-13 19:46, skrev h...@abula.org:
I did come from Java myself, and I understand the argument to ease the
transition from Java to Groovy, but as Java adopts language features
from Groovy, I worry that supporting both syntaxes will create a more
