Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-02-05 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello Luca, Am 05.02.2018 um 02:27 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-02-01 3:58 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano >: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-31 2:37 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke >: Hello,

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-02-04 Thread Luca Toscano
2018-02-05 2:41 GMT+01:00 Eric Covener : > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > > Hi Hajo, > > > > > > 2018-02-01 3:58 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > >> > >> Hi Hajo, > >> > >> 2018-01-31 2:37 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-02-04 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: > Hi Hajo, > > > 2018-02-01 3:58 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : >> >> Hi Hajo, >> >> 2018-01-31 2:37 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke : >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> Am 22.01.2018 um 11:54 schrieb

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-02-04 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Hajo, 2018-02-01 3:58 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi Hajo, > > 2018-01-31 2:37 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke : > >> Hello, >> >> >> Am 22.01.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Hajo Locke: >> >> Hello, >> >> Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano: >> >> Hi Hajo, >> >>

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-31 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Hajo, 2018-01-31 2:37 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke : > Hello, > > > Am 22.01.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Hajo Locke: > > Hello, > > Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano: > > Hi Hajo, > > 2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke : > >> Hello, >> >> thanks Daniel and

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-31 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, Am 22.01.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello, Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke >: Hello, thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point. I did the test with a

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-22 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano: Hi Hajo, 2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke >: Hello, thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point. I did the test with a static file and this test was successfully done

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-20 Thread Luca Toscano
2018-01-20 20:23 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi Yann, > > 2018-01-19 17:40 GMT+01:00 Yann Ylavic : > >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Yann Ylavic >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Daniel

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-20 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Yann, 2018-01-19 17:40 GMT+01:00 Yann Ylavic : > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Daniel wrote: > >> I vaguely recall some issue with reuse when using unix socket files

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Daniel wrote: >> I vaguely recall some issue with reuse when using unix socket files so >> it was deliberately set to off by default, but yes, perhaps someone >>

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Daniel wrote: > I vaguely recall some issue with reuse when using unix socket files so > it was deliberately set to off by default, but yes, perhaps someone > experienced enough with mod_proxy_fcgi inner workings can shed some > light on this

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Hajo, 2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke : > Hello, > > thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point. > I did the test with a static file and this test was successfully done > within only a few seconds. > > finished in 20.06s, 4984.80 req/s, 1.27GB/s > requests: 10

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Daniel
I vaguely recall some issue with reuse when using unix socket files so it was deliberately set to off by default, but yes, perhaps someone experienced enough with mod_proxy_fcgi inner workings can shed some light on this and the why yes/not. With socket files I never tried to enable

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point. I did the test with a static file and this test was successfully done within only a few seconds. finished in 20.06s, 4984.80 req/s, 1.27GB/s requests: 10 total, 10 started, 10 done, 10 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 errored, 0

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
Can someone with deeper proxy_(fcgi) knowledge than me jump in here. This goes beyond where my area... > Am 19.01.2018 um 13:23 schrieb Hajo Locke : > > Hello, > > thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point. > I did the test with a static file and this test was

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Stefan Eissing
Hej Hajo, do you have the same effect with less connections? e.g. > h2load -n10 -c10 -m10 https://example.com/phpinfo.php and, as Daniel just wrote, do you have similar problems when serving static files? (just to track down where to look) -Stefan > Am 19.01.2018 um 12:38 schrieb Hajo

Re: [users@httpd] problems benchmarking php-fpm/proxy_fcgi with h2load

2018-01-19 Thread Daniel
which are the results exactly and which are the results to a non-php file such as a gif or similar? 2018-01-19 12:38 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke : > Hello list, > > i do some http/2 benchmarks on my machine and have problems to finish at > least one test. > > System is Ubuntu16.04,