Re: [UnionModel] question about unexpected behaviour

2019-09-30 Thread Claude Warren
struct such > a dataset via an Assembler .ttl file? > > Regards, Barry > > -Original Message- > From: Claude Warren > Sent: maandag 30 september 2019 16:33 > To: users@jena.apache.org > Subject: Re: [UnionModel] question about unexpected behaviour > > Barry,

RE: [UnionModel] question about unexpected behaviour

2019-09-30 Thread Nouwt, B. (Barry)
2019 16:33 To: users@jena.apache.org Subject: Re: [UnionModel] question about unexpected behaviour Barry, You create a dataset that is comprised of the following: defaultGraph -> unionModel namedGraph(https://www.tno.nl/agrifood/graph/pizza/data) namedGraph(https://www.tno.nl/agrifood/graph/pi

Re: [UnionModel] question about unexpected behaviour

2019-09-30 Thread Claude Warren
graph :ontoGraph ] > . > > :unionModel rdf:type ja:UnionModel ; > ja:rootModel :itemGraph ; > ja:subModel :ontoGraph . > > :itemGraph rdf:type ja:MemoryModel ; > ja:content [ ja:externalContent > ] . > > :ontoGraph rdf:type ja:

Re: [UnionModel] question about unexpected behaviour

2019-09-26 Thread Claude Warren
Empty graphs in Fuseki simply don't exist. They no more exist than a predicate that has not been used. Named graphs only come into existence when there is at least one triple added to it. If you think about datasets as collections of quads ( ) then you can see that the dataset can only locate