Dolphin SMB read only?

I'm not sure if this is a Samba client issue, or an issue in Dolphin, so I'm posting to the KDE and General users lists. Is anyone else connecting to a Windows share and not being able to write to it from Dolphin? I've got a handful of Windows servers that I regularly download items to my Fedora

Re: yumex-dnf font size

Same as for all gnome (Gtk+ 3.x) applications: use gnome-tweak-tool and change the font size or the font scaling factor. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Getting luks dependency problems on boot

Hi all, I have my laptop with F23 with the root partition encrypted with luks, working great for about a year already. I had some pending upgrades which I applied today (kernel, glibc and systemd are the ones that made me open my eyes wide). The thing is that system starts booting, asks for the

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

Seemed to have it working by setting up the ports 20 and 21 in the firewall for both tcp and udp, so copied the settings from machine r to real server. Then it didn't work?? Did an nmapfe to the machine, and if either firewalld and/or iptables is running the port 20 shows up as closed. Even

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

Here is the latest stuff? And to me, it looks like the ports 20 and 21 should be open, but nmapfe is showing that 20 is closed? The firewall zones public.xml seems to show it is opened, and the iptables-save output seems to show it short be opened? So not clear what is making it show up as

Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

Use ftp to transfer files, but just had issues today in which connection is made and login works fine, but doing a ls or trying to download a file fails? Tried with passive on and off? Did use it just the other day. We did have some power issues, since two of the Island main generators are

Re: Getting luks dependency problems on boot

On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote: Hi all, Dependency failed for Cryptography Setup for luks-. Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes Those sound like systemd messages. You probably need to find out which dependency failed and that

Re: Getting luks dependency problems on boot

2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III : > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300, > Martín Marqués wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Dependency failed for Cryptography Setup for luks-. >> Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes > > > Those sound like

Re: Getting luks dependency problems on boot

2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III : > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300, > Martín Marqués wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Dependency failed for Cryptography Setup for luks-. >> Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes > > > Those sound like

Re: Cleaning up after an aborted upgrade

On 09/07/2016 02:03 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: Is there any counterpart of the old "yum check" where I can verify everything is now ok? I don't know what "yum check" did. What are you trying to verify? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription

Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED]

Le 07/09/2016 23:06, R. G. Newbury a écrit : > On 09/05/2016 05:07 AM, oe Zeff wrote: > >> Subject: Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED] >> To: Community support for Fedora users >> Message-ID: <57cc87ea.3090...@zeff.us> >> Content-Type:

Re: Cleaning up after an aborted upgrade

On 09/07/2016 01:32 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: You probably have both fedora-release packages installed. Remove the 23 one. That's an excellent idea because dnf doesn't use the contents of /etc/fedora-release, it uses the version of fedora-release.rpm. If you have a dupe, it stops when it

Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED]

On 09/07/2016 02:06 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote: Lennart Poettering has a hate for rc.local. He discusses that somewhere in his systemd blog. For whatever reason, he dislikes it and thinks that no-one should use it, or be able to use it. So you must sacrifice the correct animal, at the exactly

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 09/07/2016 11:08 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote: On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I've set up a

Re: Cleaning up after an aborted upgrade

On 09/07/2016 01:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: That's an excellent idea because dnf doesn't use the contents of /etc/fedora-release, it uses the version of fedora-release.rpm. If you have a dupe, it stops when it finds the older one and uses that. I know, because I've been burned that way. Me too,

Re: Cleaning up after an aborted upgrade

Samuel Sieb answered my plea for help. Thanks! > First do "rpm --rebuilddb" to make sure the rpm database is consistent. > Run "systemd-cat --version" to make sure you're currently running 229. > If so, then do "rpm -e systemd-222-14". Then try the upgrade again. I was running 229 (fc24) as you

Re: Cleaning up after an aborted upgrade

On 09/07/2016 01:27 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: Samuel Sieb answered my plea for help. Thanks! It seems to be trying to put everything back to F23. "rpm -qa|sort" shows that almost all of the fc23 packages are paired with fc24 packages, both of which are installed. Is there any reason I can't just

Re: Cleaning up after an aborted upgrade

On 09/07/2016 01:27 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: It seems to be trying to put everything back to F23. "rpm -qa|sort" shows that almost all of the fc23 packages are paired with fc24 packages, both of which are installed. Is there any reason I can't just remove the redundant packages? dnf remove

Re: Cleaning up after an aborted upgrade

Samuel Sieb wrote: >> It seems to be trying to put everything back to F23. "rpm >> -qa|sort" shows that almost all of the fc23 packages are paired >> with fc24 packages, both of which are installed. Is there any >> reason I can't just remove the redundant packages? >> > You probably have both

Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED]

On 09/05/2016 05:07 AM, oe Zeff wrote: Subject: Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED] To: Community support for Fedora users Message-ID: <57cc87ea.3090...@zeff.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 09/04/2016 01:34

Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED]

On 09/07/2016 02:06 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote: Lennart Poettering has a hate for rc.local. He discusses that somewhere in his systemd blog. For whatever reason, he dislikes it and thinks that no-one should use it, or be able to use it. So you must sacrifice the correct animal, at the exactly

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 09/07/2016 01:38 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: > On 09/07/2016 11:08 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote: > On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM,

Re: Apache and umask for document root

Hi, On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote: >> On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've set up a virtual host for a joomla website and having some >>> permissions problems. I've seen numerous

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 09/07/2016 03:19 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 09/07/2016 01:38 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: >> On 09/07/2016 11:08 AM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 09/06/2016 01:25

Re: problem with dnf

On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:49:41 -0700 Reynold DeMarco Jr wrote: > When I run an install with dnf the program downloads the packages > runs through transaction checks and begins the installation. When it > is done with the installation it just freezes. In the past it would > run

problem with dnf

When I run an install with dnf the program downloads the packages runs through transaction checks and begins the installation. When it is done with the installation it just freezes. In the past it would run through a verification and clean up and then return to command prompt. Any ideas on

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On 7 Sep 2016 at 13:50, Fred Smith wrote: Date sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:21 -0400 From: Fred Smith To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list? Send

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On 09/07/2016 03:55 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: On 7 Sep 2016 at 13:50, Fred Smith wrote: Date sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:21 -0400 From: Fred Smith To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I've set up a virtual host for a joomla website and having some permissions problems This is in docs.joomla.org: "PHP Being Run as an Apache Module. This causes ownership issues and thus permission problems which will lead to security issues. It is

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On 7 Sep 2016 at 16:32, Mike Wright wrote: Subject:Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list? To: Community support for Fedora users From: Mike Wright Date sent:

Re: problem with dnf

You could run strace dnf install, and capture the hanging part to attach to a bug report. You could first do a dnf clean all. It's sort of a hammer but... Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: Apache and umask for document root

Put the service file back the way it was. It's best if you can identify which directories Joomla needs write access to limit exposure. For Wordpress it's /path/to/wordpress/DocumentRoot/wp-content/{plugins,themes,upgrade,uploads} so: rw_dirs="plugins themes upgrade uploads" if you can't

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On 7 Sep 2016 at 18:38, Mike Wright wrote: Subject:Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list? To: Community support for Fedora users From: Mike Wright Date sent:

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On 09/07/2016 05:26 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: On 7 Sep 2016 at 16:32, Mike Wright wrote: 1) ftp uses tcp 2) ftp uses port 21 in both ACTIVE and PASSIVE modes 3) ftp also uses port 20 in ACTIVE mode I want to make sure I understand what is going on. d7r is the fedora24 host, correct?

Re: CUDA on F24?

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:28:41 +0300, Hiisi wrote: > 2016-08-29 11:58 GMT+03:00 Hiisi : > > > Sorry for the noise! the problem solved. It happened that installing > gcc49 worked for me. Followed this advice: >

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On 09/07/2016 08:26 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: On 7 Sep 2016 at 18:38, Mike Wright wrote: Did just notice if I do the traceroute with -I option it doesn't give the !X? Will have to look into the difference between with -I and without?? traceroute -I says use ping to follow the

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

Everything was working till just the other day? I've done more testing, and it has something to do with firewalld and iptables. I found that if I traceroute to machines not running fedora 24 it complete, but with fedora 24 machine I am getting !X I stopped firewalld and iptables on machine d7t

Re: Getting luks dependency problems on boot

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Martín Marqués > wrote: >> 2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III : >>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300, >>> Martín Marqués

Re: Getting luks dependency problems on boot

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Martín Marqués wrote: > 2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III : >> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300, >> Martín Marqués wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Dependency failed for Cryptography

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On 09/07/2016 07:18 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: Use ftp to transfer files, but just had issues today in which connection is made and login works fine, but doing a ls or trying to download a file fails? If you're behind NAT or a non-stateful firewall, you typically need to use PASV. If

Re: During rescue startup boot process halts with "cannot open access to console, the root account is locked"

On 09/06/2016 09:16 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: I have tried the parameter "emergency" - it still ends up "cannot open access to console, the root account is locked" . Have you tried using init=/bin/sh instead? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:17:32AM +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: >Everything was working till just the other day? I've done more testing, >and it has something to do with firewalld and iptables. > >I found that if I traceroute to machines not running fedora 24 it >complete,

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >> On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote: >>> On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I've set up a virtual host for a joomla website and having some

[389-users] Re: 389DS v1.3.4.x after fixes for tickets 48766 and 48954

> De: "Ludwig Krispenz" > À: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Septembre 2016 12:48:38 > Objet: [389-users] Re: 389DS v1.3.4.x after fixes for tickets 48766 and 48954 the fixes for the tickets you mention did change the iteration thru the

[389-users] Re: 389DS v1.3.4.x after fixes for tickets 48766 and 48954

On 09/07/2016 08:55 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 09/06/2016 02:02 PM, Ivanov Andrey (M.) wrote: Hi Ludwig, the fixes for the tickets you mention did change the iteration thru

[389-users] Re: 389DS v1.3.4.x after fixes for tickets 48766 and 48954

On 09/06/2016 02:02 PM, Ivanov Andrey (M.) wrote: Hi Ludwig, the fixes for the tickets you mention did change the iteration thru the changelog and how it handles situtations when