Corey,
I tried what you suggested. I downloaded the archive and ran the dnf
buildep firefox and that version of firefox works. What's interesting
is that the firefox directory contains several libraries that do not
exist in /usr/lib64/firefox. For example there are several nss related
I am writing a spec file. Everything build fine until the very last. Make
throw an error and I don't understand why.
Part of the spec file:
cd %{_builddir}
install -Dm755 bin/platform %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/bin/platform
install -Dm755 mattermost.sh
On 13/01/17 23:52, JD wrote:
Has anyone been able to make this work.
The USB tv tuner I thought I would get for cheap is
http://www.ebay.com/itm/USB-2-0-TV-Stick-Tuner-Receiver-Adapter-Worldwide-Analog-for-PC-Laptop-DVD-/282323120651?hash=item41bbc4f20b:g:inEAAOSwd4tUF~E1
If it will not work,
Hi
Maybe it's a silly question, but - how can I feed my gnome shell calendar
with Fedocal scheduled meetings? Is it possible to check time to time
updates, or need to download every time new ical files?
Thanks,
Zoltan
--
PGP: 06853DF7
___
users
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:53 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:57 PM arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:25:07 +, arnaud
On 01/14/17 14:08, Andre Robatino wrote:
I'm not sure whether it will take effect on the next push or not, Kevin Fenzi
made the change just after I asked about it on #fedora-releng . He said he
wasn't sure whether it would make all the missing deltas, or just the new ones
going forward.
+
I have an intel chip, and X has always used xorg-x11-drv-intel. But this
week's update of X defaults to the modesetting driver. Which is OK, but
it fails:
.
[114614.766] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so
[114614.767] (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull in updated
packages, but it still crashes.
Paolo
On 01/13/2017 03:54 PM, stan wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:18:43 -0800
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
Anyone have any idea what's going on and how I can fix the
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:25:07 +, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-hardlink
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
> error: Bad file:
> /home/makerpm/build_package/mattermost/mattermost-user.conf: No such file
> or directory
You've not given enough information,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:25:07 +, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-hardlink
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
> > error: Bad file:
> >
Hello,
Fedora 22 isn't supported. You'd be better backing up your files and
making a fresh install of Fedora 25. It will save you time and bad moments.
Cheers,
Sylvia
On 13 January 2017 at 01:41, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I decided today to upgrade one of my systems to
Turns out that the F25 drpm settings weren't updated after release. It's just
been changed, see
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=db07e40 .
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:16:10 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> Turns out that the F25 drpm settings weren't updated after release.
> It's just been changed, see
> http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=db07e40 .
Thanks for pursuing this. I
I think it's expected that the size of the update metadata grows after release.
There have been some bugs filed in the past to delta the metadata (for example
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850896 ), but it hasn't happened so
far.
___
If F22 isn't supported then it shouldn't have tried to download all the
files to do the upgrade. When I ran the
dnf system-upgrade download --allowerasing --refresh --releasever=25
it should have failed immediately saying an upgrade from F22 is not
supported.
Paolo
On 01/14/2017 09:37 AM,
Resuming from S2D, I got these messages
kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2d on CPU 0.
kernel: Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? <
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:04:10 -0800
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull in
> updated packages, but it still crashes.
Since this is an upgraded system, is it possible that there is an
obscure library hanging around?
If you do
I've checked all the libraries and the checksums match the libraries on
the system where firefox works fine.
Paolo
On 01/14/2017 09:38 AM, stan wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:04:10 -0800
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I tried removing firefox and re-installing it and it did pull
On 01/14/17 12:29, stan wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:16:10 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
Turns out that the F25 drpm settings weren't updated after release.
It's just been changed, see
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=db07e40 .
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:04:24 -0800
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I've checked all the libraries and the checksums match the libraries
> on the system where firefox works fine.
You've discovered non-deterministic binaries! :-)
Is it possible it is an obsolete add-on causing the
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:55:02 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> I think it's expected that the size of the update metadata grows
> after release. There have been some bugs filed in the past to delta
> the metadata (for example
>
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 10:03 -0800, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> If F22 isn't supported then it shouldn't have tried to download all the
> files to do the upgrade. When I ran the
>
> dnf system-upgrade download --allowerasing --refresh --releasever=25
>
> it should have failed immediately saying an
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:57 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:25:07 +, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-hardlink
> > +
On 01/14/2017 02:34 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
On 13/01/17 23:52, JD wrote:
Has anyone been able to make this work.
The USB tv tuner I thought I would get for cheap is
I'm not sure whether it will take effect on the next push or not, Kevin Fenzi
made the change just after I asked about it on #fedora-releng . He said he
wasn't sure whether it would make all the missing deltas, or just the new ones
going forward.
___
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 10:11:27 -0600, kevin martin wrote:
> Perhaps this is not the correct place to ask this but going to the
> fedoraproject main page is no help so
>
> Trying to install clamav for EL6 and it keeps seeing clamav-0.99-3 but
> clamav--0.99-3 doesn't exist anywhere but one
On 14 January 2017 at 01:18, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> After my rather strange upgrade to F25 from F22 documented in a previous
> email to this list "Issue upgrading to F25" I'm now having an issue with
> firefox. Firefox will crash on startup. I tried starting in safe-mode
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 13:57 -0700, JD wrote:
> Resuming from S2D, I got these messages
And S2D would mean ...?
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Yes I did run dnf distro-sync and it did update packages, but it made no
difference.
Paolo
On 01/14/2017 02:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
dnf distro-sync
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:21:37 -0800
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I tried logging in as myself using the Gnome Classic desktop and
> firefox still crashes. I created a new user and after logging in as
> that user I ran firefox and it still crashes.
I don't have any more ideas for
I tried logging in as myself using the Gnome Classic desktop and firefox
still crashes. I created a new user and after logging in as that user I
ran firefox and it still crashes.
Paolo
On 01/14/2017 10:18 AM, stan wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:04:24 -0800
Paolo Galtieri
Hi,
A wild guess - S2D stands for "Suspend To Disk" ( The OP talks about
resuming from S2D, so this guess does make sense, I hope).
Rami Rosen
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 18:53:30 +, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> In fact, I realize I am totally confused between the "old" method I used to
> build .rpm and this new wiki using fedpkg. Before, I used to have BUILD,
> BUILDROOT, SOURCES etc folders inside rpmbuild. Now, I am not sure how to
> setup my
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:57:42 +, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> %prep
> %autosetup -n platform-master
>
> # many golang binaries are "vendoring" (bundling) sources, so remove them.
> Those dependencies need to be packaged independently.
> cd %{_builddir}
Don't get accustomed to that. Don't cd into
34 matches
Mail list logo