Re: /etc/motd shows up twice now?

2018-07-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/12/18 09:45, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 07/12/18 08:27, Tom Horsley wrote: >> I ssh into my fedora 28 system at work, I get this printed >> when I login: >> >> zooty> ssh -l tweety tomh8022 >> -- >> /etc/motd printed here >>

Re: /etc/motd shows up twice now?

2018-07-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/12/18 08:27, Tom Horsley wrote: > I ssh into my fedora 28 system at work, I get this printed > when I login: > > zooty> ssh -l tweety tomh8022 > -- > /etc/motd printed here >

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-11 Thread Rick Stevens
On 07/11/2018 03:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 11/7/18 8:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> On 07/10/2018 03:17 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: >>> 1). Can anyone shed any light on why the install may have failed and >>> what I need to do to work around it? I'm hoping I don't have to run a >>> 'sudo dnf

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-11 Thread stan
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:16:06 +1000 Stephen Morris wrote: > Both with the F28 kernel, being 4.17.3-200, and the F27 kernel I > mentioned, the compile fails with stdarg.h not found, so I'm now > confused about what the F28 upgrade has done. The F28 upgrade should > not have updated the F27 kernel

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-11 Thread Stephen Morris
On 12/7/18 8:38 am, Rick Stevens wrote: On 07/11/2018 03:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 11/7/18 8:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 07/10/2018 03:17 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: 1). Can anyone shed any light on why the install may have failed and what I need to do to work around it? I'm hoping I

Re: /etc/motd shows up twice now?

2018-07-11 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:37 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > I ssh into my fedora 28 system at work, I get this printed > when I login: > > zooty> ssh -l tweety tomh8022 > -- > /etc/motd printed here >

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-11 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Stephen Morris writes: and that installed all the package updates that caused the conflicts. Having done this I was able to complete the upgrade to F28, but now I have big problems. Under F28 my USB network device doesn't work because dkms can't compile the driver for it, and, either

/etc/motd shows up twice now?

2018-07-11 Thread Tom Horsley
I ssh into my fedora 28 system at work, I get this printed when I login: zooty> ssh -l tweety tomh8022 -- /etc/motd printed here -- Last login: Wed Jul 11 20:21:39 2018 from

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-11 Thread Stephen Morris
On 11/7/18 8:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 07/10/2018 03:17 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: 1). Can anyone shed any light on why the install may have failed and what I need to do to work around it? I'm hoping I don't have to run a 'sudo dnf clean all' and then a 'sudo dnf system-upgrade --refresh

Re: F27 to F28 Upgrade Fails at Offline Install Time

2018-07-11 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/11/2018 03:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 11/7/18 8:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 07/10/2018 03:17 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: 2). Where can I find the logs that would contain the error message so I can read what it said, given that /var/log/boot.log and /var/log/dnf.log both don't

[389-users] Re: Best method to duplicate 389-ds to new server?

2018-07-11 Thread Brian Lehnhardt
Yeah, my plan is to setup a replication agreement. That way I don't have to do multiple imports. I need the old and new servers to stay in sync until the cutover. ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

[389-users] Best method to duplicate 389-ds to new server?

2018-07-11 Thread Brian Lehnhardt
I have a current 389 deployment that I need to duplicate to a new set of servers to be used at a different facility on a different network. I'm thinking that I could either do an import or use replication. My plan is to use replication to replicate the data to the new set of servers. That

[389-users] keepalived with 389-ds

2018-07-11 Thread Brian Lehnhardt
Does anyone use keepalived with a mult-master setup? I'm currently using an haproxy, but I think just using a vip between the two masters should be sufficient for my use case. I'm curious how keepalived would work with a 389 server. ___ 389-users

[389-users] cfg nsidletimeout per user

2018-07-11 Thread Ghiurea, Isabella
Hi List I am looking to cfg nsIdleTimeout attribute for a specific DS user, I tryed using 389-console and ldapmodify but I not successful, in 389-console this attribute is in grey when trying to add a value will not allowed , with ldapmodify nothing happened no prompt or error given back but

[389-users] Re: cfg nsidletimeout per user

2018-07-11 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 07/11/2018 03:20 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote: Hi List I am looking to cfg nsIdleTimeout attribute for a specific  DS user, I tryed using 389-console and ldapmodify but I not successful, in 389-console this attribute is in grey when trying to add a value will not allowed , with

[389-users] Re: keepalived with 389-ds

2018-07-11 Thread William Brown
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 19:03 +, Brian Lehnhardt wrote: > Does anyone use keepalived with a mult-master setup? I'm currently > using an haproxy, but I think just using a vip between the two > masters should be sufficient for my use case. I'm curious how > keepalived would work with a 389

[389-users] Re: More meaningful failure messages when changing passwords

2018-07-11 Thread William Brown
On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 22:39 +, Mitch Patenaude wrote: > Our organization’s security policies impose several constraints on > password changes. There is a complexity requirement, and a ban on > reuse of old passwords. I’ve gotten all of these requirements worked > into the 389 server, but

[389-users] Re: cfg nsidletimeout per user

2018-07-11 Thread William Brown
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 16:05 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > On 07/11/2018 03:20 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote: > > Hi List > > I am looking to cfg nsIdleTimeout attribute for a specific DS > > user, I tryed using 389-console and ldapmodify but I not > > successful, in 389-console this attribute