On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Tim wrote:
Hi,
> Allegedly, on or about 16 August 2016, Patrick O'Callaghan sent:
>> That would make sense except that it also seems to list kernels for
>> some reason (I can't recall ever doing "dnf install kernel"), so who
>> knows.
>
> In that case, it sounds
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 09/13/2016 06:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>
>> The odd thing is that none of the "problematic" packages --
>> gnupg2-smime, libguestfs-xfs, pinentry -- are installed.
the same it's written in summary that these package will be skipped
(
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
>> this output makes sense.
>>
> I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it
> drops them from t
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
>>> this output makes sense.
>>>
>> I would assume that means dnf can't f
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Meanwhile, the important bit is that I found the
> "install_weak_deps" dnf.conf config option in the
> man page, so I can make it ignore merely recommended
> packages in the future.
Hi, yes, setting `install_weak_deps=0` in dnf.conf is the way
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:26 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:06 AM arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>>
>> I want to upgrade from 24 to 25. Following this[0], I first run:
>> # dnf upgrade --refresh
>>
>> I am left with an issue for one package:
>>
>> ---
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:51 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, 1:45 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> On December 12, 2016 2:06:37 AM PST, arnaud gaboury
>> wrote:
>> >--
>> > Upgrading :
>> >httpd-2.4.23-5.fc24.x86_64
>> >1/4
>> >Error unpacking rpm
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:47 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/15/17 10:31, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Try "dnf reposync --repoid google-chrome". The "--repoid google-chrome"
>> works with repoquery.
Hi,
With dnf-2.0.0 it should be possible to use --repo instead of --repoid
as documented.
> Yes, that wo
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Michael D. Setzer II
wrote:
> On 21 Feb 2017 at 7:23, jarmo wrote:
>
> Date sent: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:23:03 +0200
> From: jarmo
> To: Community support for Fedora users
>
> Subject:Update broken
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:55 PM, CLOSE Dave
wrote:
> On 02/14/17 18:31, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
>> Try "dnf reposync --repoid google-chrome". The "--repoid
>> google-chrome" works with repoquery.
>
> The reference to repoid "google-chrome" apparently refers to the name in
> the .repo file (in /etc/y
Hi,
# yum-deprecated list --showduplicates -q | wc -l
73450
# dnf list --showduplicates -q | wc -l
76411
vs
# yum-deprecated list -q | wc -l
56101
# dnf list -q | wc -l
55966
(counts differs because different metadata)
seems like it does something in both DNF and yum. Even after checking
t
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> On 03/17/17 12:38, Honza Silhan wrote:
>
>>
>> # yum-deprecated list --showduplicates -q | wc -l
>> 73450
>>
>> # dnf list --showduplicates -q | wc -l
>> 76411
>>
>> vs
>>
>&
12 matches
Mail list logo
