Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-19 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 09/19/2016 03:52 AM, Honza Silhan wrote: That's why I requested the debugdata so we know exact dependencies and your system state where you can reproduce the problem ;). It shows updating + skipped section together and should show all packages that could be updated (like output of check-upgra

Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-19 Thread Honza Silhan
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 09/14/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >> On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >>> >>> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which >>> this output makes sense. >>> >> I would assume that means dnf can't f

Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-14 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 09/14/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which this output makes sense. I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it drops them from the attempt. But why i

Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-14 Thread Honza Silhan
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> >> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which >> this output makes sense. >> > I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it > drops them from t

Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-14 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which this output makes sense. I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it drops them from the attempt. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-14 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 09/14/2016 03:51 AM, Honza Silhan wrote: please try what Samuel suggests (add "--best --allowerasing"). It should pull in these packages but will remove/downgrade some packages currently on your system. (proceed only if you want to) After updating a bunch of unrelated packages, to simplify t

Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-14 Thread Honza Silhan
Hi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 09/13/2016 06:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> >> The odd thing is that none of the "problematic" packages -- >> gnupg2-smime, libguestfs-xfs, pinentry -- are installed. the same it's written in summary that these package will be skipped (

Re: Odd DNF output

2016-09-13 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 09/13/2016 06:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: The odd thing is that none of the "problematic" packages -- gnupg2-smime, libguestfs-xfs, pinentry -- are installed. I have install_weak_deps=false in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf, so it shouldn't be trying to install weak dependencies. Anyone know what the heck