Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/20/14 13:49, M. Fioretti wrote:
 Greetings,

 a while ago, I noticed that on my Fedora box digiKam would not load
 and display picture galleries anymore, and when launched from the
 prompt would produce this message:

 digikam(14981)/digikam (core): Reached inotify limit

 which IIUC means this is a general problem on that computer, not
 digikam specific.

 An online search returned always the same fix described e.g. at
 http://monodevelop.com/Inotify_watches_limit, that is:
 ##
 To change the limit, run:

 # echo 16384  /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches

 To make the change permanent, edit the file /etc/sysctl.conf and add
 this line to the end of the file:

 fs.inotify.max_user_watches=16384
 ##

 (the current value now is 8192)

 I could not, however, find any clear (to me at least) explanation of
 possible unwanted side-effects of this. Should I check/do something
 else (but what?) or can I safely apply those suggestions and reboot?
 Is there risk that doing that stuff as is messes things up and
 forces me to spend a day or so recovering the system?


I don't know how the system sets this value.  8192 seems rather small to me.  
On my system

[egreshko@meimei inotify]$ cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches
524288

This is the case on an F20 system with 8GB of RAM on real HW and a VM with 1 GB.

And there is nothing in my sysctl.conf to override.

-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:11:24 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 
 I don't know how the system sets this value.  8192 seems rather small to me.

good point, thanks. This, in fact, is a side question that I forgot to
ask in my original email: what are the criteria or rule of thumb to
calculate which value of max_user_watches is sensible? Does it depend
on number of files, RAM amount, what else?


 And there is nothing in my sysctl.conf to override.

same here, but I understand that I should __ADD__ that setting at the
end of the file. But this is another point on which I am seeking
confirmation/feedback, instead of risking to stop work for a day to
fix some problem...

Marco
-- 

M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com   http://stop.zona-m.net

Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/20/14 14:09, M. Fioretti wrote:
 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:11:24 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 I don't know how the system sets this value.  8192 seems rather small to me.
 good point, thanks. This, in fact, is a side question that I forgot to
 ask in my original email: what are the criteria or rule of thumb to
 calculate which value of max_user_watches is sensible? Does it depend
 on number of files, RAM amount, what else?


 And there is nothing in my sysctl.conf to override.
 same here, but I understand that I should __ADD__ that setting at the
 end of the file. But this is another point on which I am seeking
 confirmation/feedback, instead of risking to stop work for a day to
 fix some problem...

 Marco

Well  As I noted, my 1GB VM F20 system has a value of 524288.  I can't see 
how upping that value on your system will damage anything.  In the little 
searching I also did on that issue I see some folks with 1M+ for that value.

-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:40:07 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 One silly question.
 
 What version of Fedora are you running.  I found a message on the mailing 
 lists back in 2010 which, from a reliable source, indicated

this is happening on an F17 box. It **is** scheduled to be moved (full
reinstall, not update) to F20 in a couple of weeks, but for reasons
not really relevant here it has to stay F17 until then :-(

Marco

 kde packagers received a request to consider shipping systems with a
 higher (default) value of
 /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches
 to allow for a better experience for noticing changes (notably when
 using nepomuk indexing of content in users' homedir).

 The suggested value was something like 524288 (seems the default on f13
 is 8192).
 
 
 -- 
 Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
 -- 
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

-- 

M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com   http://stop.zona-m.net

Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/20/14 15:08, M. Fioretti wrote:
 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:40:07 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 One silly question.

 What version of Fedora are you running.  I found a message on the 
 mailing lists back in 2010 which, from a reliable source, indicated
 this is happening on an F17 box. It **is** scheduled to be moved (full
 reinstall, not update) to F20 in a couple of weeks, but for reasons
 not really relevant here it has to stay F17 until then :-(


FWIW, everything I've seen indicates this value is not calculated but 
configured when the kernel is compiled.  I just happen to have an old F17 disk 
and created a VM.

As expected, it is set to 8192.


-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 16:24:08 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 On 04/20/14 15:08, M. Fioretti wrote:

 FWIW, everything I've seen indicates this value is not calculated
 but configured when the kernel is compiled.  I just happen to have
 an old F17 disk and created a VM.  As expected, it is set to 8192.

ok that's why then. So the only thing I need, if anything, is further
confirmation that increasing it on F17 would not cause problems. I'll
wait until tomorrow for further comments and then risk the increase
:-)
Marco
-- 

M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com   http://stop.zona-m.net

Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/20/14 16:28, M. Fioretti wrote:
 ok that's why then. So the only thing I need, if anything, is further
 confirmation that increasing it on F17 would not cause problems. I'll
 wait until tomorrow for further comments and then risk the increase
 :-)

FWIW, I just made the change in /etc/sysctl.conf to up it to 524288, rebooted, 
and everything seems to be working as normal.

-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 20 April 2014 10:28, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:

 On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 16:24:08 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
  On 04/20/14 15:08, M. Fioretti wrote:

  FWIW, everything I've seen indicates this value is not calculated
  but configured when the kernel is compiled.  I just happen to have
  an old F17 disk and created a VM.  As expected, it is set to 8192.

 ok that's why then. So the only thing I need, if anything, is further
 confirmation that increasing it on F17 would not cause problems. I'll
 wait until tomorrow for further comments and then risk the increase
 :-)
 Marco
 --

 M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com   http://stop.zona-m.net

 Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
 software is used *around* you


The value of fs.inotify.max_user_watches was increased in F18, and later
releases, due to this bug[1] in nepomuk. It's configured by
/usr/lib/sysctl.d/97-kde-nepomuk-filewatch-inotify.conf which is installed
by nepomuk-core, so ideally you'd get that value if you have KDE or
installed a package that pulled nepomuk-core as a dependency.

[1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858271

-- 
Ahmad Samir
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/20/14 20:51, Ahmad Samir wrote:
 The value of fs.inotify.max_user_watches was increased in F18, and later 
 releases, due to this bug[1] in nepomuk. It's configured by 
 /usr/lib/sysctl.d/97-kde-nepomuk-filewatch-inotify.conf which is installed by 
 nepomuk-core, so ideally you'd get that value if you have KDE or installed a 
 package that pulled nepomuk-core as a dependency.
  
 [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858271

Thanks for that.  I should have know to check that directory.

-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: advice needed before changing inotify max_user_watches

2014-04-20 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/20/14 21:38, Ahmad Samir wrote:
 /usr/lib/sysctl.d/97-kde-nepomuk-filewatch-inotify.conf is included in the 
 initramfs by dracut when a kernel is installed/updated. Check `lsinitrd 
 /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img | grep sysctl`.

 So in effect you'd have to re-create the initramfs after uninstalling 
 nepomuk-core to make that custom setting go away completely.

Duh!


-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org