[OMPI users] errors while making openmpi

Hi all, in make check for openmpi on a mac I see following error message, has anybody ever run to this error? any solutions? Best, Hamed, raw extraction in 1 microsec Example 3.26 type1 correct Example 3.26 type1 correct Example 3.26 type2 correct type3 correct hindexed ok indexed ok

Re: [OMPI users] errors while making openmpi

What version are you talking about? On May 13, 2014, at 11:13 PM, Hamed Mortazavi wrote: > Hi all, > > in make check for openmpi on a mac I see following error message, has anybody > ever run to this error? any solutions? > > Best, > > Hamed, > raw extraction in

[OMPI users] bug in MPI_File_set_view?

Hello, I am using MPI IO for writing/reading a block cyclic distribution matrix into a file. It works fine except when there is some MPI threads with no data (i.e. when the matrix is small enough, or the block size is big enough that some processes in the grid do not have any matrix block).

Re: [OMPI users] bug in MPI_File_set_view?

You might give it a try with 1.8.1 or the nightly snapshot from 1.8.2 - we updated ROMIO since the 1.6 series, and whatever fix is required may be in the newer version On May 14, 2014, at 6:52 AM, CANELA-XANDRI Oriol wrote: > Hello, > > I am using MPI

Re: [OMPI users] bug in MPI_File_set_view?

We also fixed a similar bug in OMPIO roughly one year back, so I would hope that it should work with OMPIO as well. Thanks Edga On 5/14/2014 9:17 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > You might give it a try with 1.8.1 or the nightly snapshot from 1.8.2 - we > updated ROMIO since the 1.6 series, and

[OMPI users] unknown interface on openmpi-1.9a1r31750

Hi, I just installed openmpi-1.9a1r31750 on my machines (Solaris 10 Sparc, Solaris 10 x86_64, and openSUSE Linux 12.1 x86_64) with Sun C5.12 and still have the following problem. tyr fd1026 102 which mpiexec /usr/local/openmpi-1.9_64_cc/bin/mpiexec tyr fd1026 103 mpiexec -np 3 --host

[OMPI users] unknown interface on openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742

Hi, I just installed openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742 on my machines (Solaris 10 Sparc, Solaris 10 x86_64, and openSUSE Linux 12.1 x86_64) with Sun C5.12 and still have the following problem. tyr fd1026 102 which mpiexec /usr/local/openmpi-1.8.2_64_cc/bin/mpiexec tyr fd1026 103 mpiexec -np 3 --host

Re: [OMPI users] unknown interface on openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742

What are the interfaces on these machines? On May 14, 2014, at 7:45 AM, Siegmar Gross wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742 on my machines (Solaris 10 > Sparc, Solaris 10 x86_64, and openSUSE Linux 12.1 x86_64) with > Sun C5.12 and

Re: [OMPI users] bug in MPI_File_set_view?

Is there an ETA for 1.8.2 general release instead of snapshot? Thanks, -- bennet On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > You might give it a try with 1.8.1 or the nightly snapshot from 1.8.2 - we > updated ROMIO since the 1.6 series, and whatever fix is

Re: [OMPI users] bug in MPI_File_set_view?

Our initial thinking was first half of June, but that is subject to change depending on severity of reported errors. FWIW: I don't believe we made any romio changes between 1.8.1 and the current 1.8.2 state, so using 1.8.1 should be a valid test. On May 14, 2014, at 8:16 AM, Bennet Fauber

Re: [OMPI users] unknown interface on openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742

Hi Ralph, > What are the interfaces on these machines? tyr fd1026 111 ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 bge0: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2 inet

Re: [OMPI users] unknown interface on openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742

Hmmm...well, that's an interesting naming scheme :-) Try adding "-mca oob_base_verbose 10 --report-uri -" on your cmd line and let's see what it thinks is happening On May 14, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Siegmar Gross wrote: > Hi Ralph, > >> What are the

Re: [OMPI users] unknown interface on openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742

Hi Ralph, > Hmmm...well, that's an interesting naming scheme :-) > > Try adding "-mca oob_base_verbose 10 --report-uri -" on your cmd line > and let's see what it thinks is happening tyr fd1026 105 mpiexec -np 3 --host tyr,sunpc1,linpc1 --mca oob_base_verbose 10 --report-uri - hostname

Re: [OMPI users] unknown interface on openmpi-1.8.2a1r31742

Just committed a potential fix to the trunk - please let me know if it worked for you On May 14, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Siegmar Gross wrote: > Hi Ralph, > >> Hmmm...well, that's an interesting naming scheme :-) >> >> Try adding "-mca oob_base_verbose 10

[OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

Hi, I was compiling OpenMPI 1.8.1 today and I noticed that pretty much every single scheduler has its support enabled by default at configure (except the one I need, which is Torque). Is there a reason for that ? Why not have a single scheduler enabled and require to specify it at configure

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

On 05/14/2014 04:25 PM, Maxime Boissonneault wrote: Hi, I was compiling OpenMPI 1.8.1 today and I noticed that pretty much every single scheduler has its support enabled by default at configure (except the one I need, which is Torque). Is there a reason for that ? Why not have a single scheduler

[OMPI users] Build failure on scientific linux 5.4

I am having the same compile time failure mentioned on the devel group here: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/02/14221.php In short, the compilation of romio fails with errors about redefinition of lstat64, I am attaching the requested configuration and make outputs. Can anyone

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

Hi Gus, Oh, I know that, what I am refering to is that slurm and loadleveler support are enabled by default, and it seems that if we're using Torque/Moab, we have no use for slurm and loadleveler support. My point is not that it is hard to compile it with torque support, my point is that it

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

Here's a bit of our rational, from the README file: Note that for many of Open MPI's --with- options, Open MPI will, by default, search for header files and/or libraries for . If the relevant files are found, Open MPI will built support for ; if they are not found, Open MPI will

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

FWIW: I believe we no longer build the slurm support by default, though I'd have to check to be sure. The intent is definitely not to do so. The plan we adjusted to a while back was to *only* build support for schedulers upon request. Can't swear that they are all correctly updated, but that

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

Indeed, a quick review indicates that the new policy for scheduler support was not uniformly applied. I'll update it. To reiterate: we will only build support for a scheduler if the user specifically requests it. We did this because we are increasingly seeing distros include header support for

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

On May 14, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > FWIW: I believe we no longer build the slurm support by default, though I'd > have to check to be sure. The intent is definitely not to do so. The srun-based support builds by default. I like it that way. :-) PMI-based

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

On May 14, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > On May 14, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > >> FWIW: I believe we no longer build the slurm support by default, though I'd >> have to check to be sure. The intent is definitely not to

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

Jeff and I have talked about this and are approaching a compromise. Still more thinking to do, perhaps providing new configure options to "only build what I ask for" and/or a tool to support a menu-driven selection of what to build - as opposed to today's "build everything you don't tell me to

Re: [OMPI users] Build failure on scientific linux 5.4

Just sniffing around the web, I found that this is a problem caused by newer versions of gcc. One reporter stated that they resolved the problem by adding "-fgnu89-inline" to their configuration: "add the compiler flag "-fgnu89-inline" (because of an issue where old glibc libraries aren't

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

For the scheduler issue, I would be happy with something like, if I ask for support for X, disable support for Y, Z and W. I am assuming that very rarely will someone use more than one scheduler. Maxime Le 2014-05-14 19:09, Ralph Castain a écrit : Jeff and I have talked about this and are

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

Good point - will see what we can do about it. On May 14, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Maxime Boissonneault wrote: > For the scheduler issue, I would be happy with something like, if I ask for > support for X, disable support for Y, Z and W. I am assuming that very

Re: [OMPI users] Question about scheduler support

I think Maxime's suggestion is sane and reasonable. Just in case you're taking ha'penny's worth from the groundlings. I think I would prefer not to have capability included that we won't use. -- bennet On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Maxime Boissonneault