I think that the autopilot feature predates the 'cg' electron minimization
Paolo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 4:19 AM Nam Tran wrote:
> I have found that electron_dynamics = 'cg' is not implemented in the code
> (cp_autopilot.f90). Is there any special reason for this ?.
>
> ! ELECTRON_DYNAMICS
> !
Hi,
When I relax Fe(110) surface ( 2 iron layers, the bottom layer is fixed),the
caculation stoped with:convergence NOT achieved after 200 iterations.But when I
add ‘nbnd=380' in the input file,the caculation end with :Total force =
0.001689 Total SCF correction = 0.001787 SCF correction
Hi Gui,
a few things that help convergence: mixing_beta, mixing_mode. Is there a
reason you want a certain number of bands? Otherwise smearing will add a
suitable number of empty bands anyway.
Check out thermo_pw; a really great tool to generate and calculate slab
systems:
Hello Chao,
do you mean, if you can compute lambda, or you have computed it already and
you are asking if it makes sense?
THe big problem with negative frequencies with this kind of system is that
you cannot really impose conservation of energy, but as in elph
conservation of energy is maybe not
How did you compute the "charge on water"?
Paolo
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:57 PM Dan Gil wrote:
> Dear QE Users,
>
> I am trying looking at how the electron density redistributes itself when
> two objects are in close proximity. The two objects in questions is a water
> molecule and a quartz
Dear Lorenzo,
Thank you. I am sure the system is not metallic, the band gap (calculated
with PBE) should be around 0.59 eV (vs. experimental 1.41 eV). I tried your
suggestions, but with no luck (energy oscillates instead of converging). I
tried changing mixing_beta from 0.05 to 0.9, increasing and
Indeed this is an issue with my QE build (I've just tried with a gcc build
- and all went fine!), so please disregard my previous email.
Best,
MK
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 10:52, Michal Krompiec
wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm struggling with SCF convergence of something that should be a simple
>
Dear Evgeny,
1. Let's consider a supercell with odd number of electron with
nspin=1 (non-polarized calculation). The result should probably be
incorrect, but how would the error manifest? I'm specifically
interested in errors for electron state structure and total energy.
A/ The calculation may
I ran three simulations: (1) Water and quartz, (2) quartz only, and (3)
water only.
With pp.x I obtained the electron density along a coordinate for each
simulation. Then I did:
deltaRho = Rho(Water) - Rho(WaterOnly) - Rho(QuartzOnly)
Which yielded how the electron density is perturbed on each
Dear all,
I'am trying to understand the symmetries of the dynamical matrix given in the
phonon output :
Dynamical Matrix in cartesian axes
q = ( 0.0 0.0 0.0 )
1 1
0.26846543 0. -0.00021832 0. -0.00074984 0.
-0.00021197
10 matches
Mail list logo