Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-09 Thread Thomas Spiegl 
No, you will always get the UINavigationMenuItem.

On 2/8/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OK, I used the daily from today and it is returning the value I was looking
 for, but not the UINavigationMenuItem like I would expect.  It's still
 returning the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu.

 Should I be getting the UINavigationMenuItem when I am coding like you said
 in example a below?


  From: Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:21:58 -0500
  To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Subject: RE: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
  I actually had it like your example a, except instead of an action, I
  defined and actionListener.  This is where the source component was the 
  menu
  and not the UINavigationMenuItem, as I would have expected.  I'll try it 
  with
  the next nightly build and let you know how that works.
 
  thanks.
  Richard
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tue 2/7/2006 6:09 PM
  To: MyFaces Discussion
  Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
  You can choose between 2 tags to create the menu tree:
 
  a) t:navigationMenuItem itemLabel=... action=... /
  This tag creates an UINavigationMenuItem component. Perfect, this one
  could be passed to the ActionListener
 
  b) t:navigationMenuItems value=#{...}
  where the value binds a List of NavigationMenuItem(s) (remember a
  NavigationMenuItem is not a component). As no component will be
  generated for a NavigationMenuItem in the render phase, the only
  component that can be passed to the ActionListener is the menu itself.
 
  Thomas
 
  On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks Thomas.  I'll grab the nightly tomorrow and try it out.
 
  What do you mean that most of you are using the NavigationMenuItem(s) to
  create the entire menu tree?  Does that mean you aren't using the 
  jscookMenu
  tag, but some other tag?  Does this allow you to achieve the parameter
  passing approach?
 
  If there is a best practice type of approach that I'm not using, I would
  love to hear it.
 
  Thanks,
  Richard
 
 
 
  From: Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:49:18 +0100
  To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
  ty richard - this is a bug. I just fixed this issue. The item's value
  will be returned again instead of the label. I think most of us are
  using NavigationMenuItem(s) to create the entire menu tree.
  NavigationMenuItem is not an UIComponent, that's why it can't be
  passed by the event.
 
  regards
  Thomas
 
  Regarding your question, why the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu is returned as
  source component. Well
 
  On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Thanks for your response.  I downloaded the nightly yesterday and am
  seeing
  strange behavior.
 
   I tried adding an action listener to the navigationMenuItem and the 
  event
  I
  get in my listener gives me the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu object as the 
  source
  instead of the MenuItem itself, so I can't determine which item was
  selected.  The strange thing is that the getValue method of the
  HtmlCommandJSCookMenu returns the label of the selected item.  I hate to
  have to switch on the label though, because it's bound to change.
 
   Is this working as intended?
 
   Thanks,
   Richard
 
 
   
  From: Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
   Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:25:46 -0200
   To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
   Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
   not.
   You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has
  actionListener feature.
 
 
   On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
  Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem?  If
  not,
   is there a way to achieve the same result?
 
   thanks.
 
 
 
 
   --
   Dudu
   `P
 
 
 
  --
  http://www.irian.at
 
  Your JSF powerhouse -
  JSF Consulting, Development and
  Courses in English and German
 
  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
 
 
 
 
  --
  http://www.irian.at
 
  Your JSF powerhouse -
  JSF Consulting, Development and
  Courses in English and German
 
  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
 
 




--
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-08 Thread Richard Frazer 
OK, I used the daily from today and it is returning the value I was looking
for, but not the UINavigationMenuItem like I would expect.  It's still
returning the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu.

Should I be getting the UINavigationMenuItem when I am coding like you said
in example a below?


 From: Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:21:58 -0500
 To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
 Subject: RE: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
 I actually had it like your example a, except instead of an action, I
 defined and actionListener.  This is where the source component was the menu
 and not the UINavigationMenuItem, as I would have expected.  I'll try it with
 the next nightly build and let you know how that works.
 
 thanks.
 Richard
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tue 2/7/2006 6:09 PM
 To: MyFaces Discussion
 Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
  
 You can choose between 2 tags to create the menu tree:
 
 a) t:navigationMenuItem itemLabel=... action=... /
 This tag creates an UINavigationMenuItem component. Perfect, this one
 could be passed to the ActionListener
 
 b) t:navigationMenuItems value=#{...}
 where the value binds a List of NavigationMenuItem(s) (remember a
 NavigationMenuItem is not a component). As no component will be
 generated for a NavigationMenuItem in the render phase, the only
 component that can be passed to the ActionListener is the menu itself.
 
 Thomas
 
 On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks Thomas.  I'll grab the nightly tomorrow and try it out.
 
 What do you mean that most of you are using the NavigationMenuItem(s) to
 create the entire menu tree?  Does that mean you aren't using the jscookMenu
 tag, but some other tag?  Does this allow you to achieve the parameter
 passing approach?
 
 If there is a best practice type of approach that I'm not using, I would
 love to hear it.
 
 Thanks,
 Richard
 
 
 
 From: Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:49:18 +0100
 To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
 Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
 ty richard - this is a bug. I just fixed this issue. The item's value
 will be returned again instead of the label. I think most of us are
 using NavigationMenuItem(s) to create the entire menu tree.
 NavigationMenuItem is not an UIComponent, that's why it can't be
 passed by the event.
 
 regards
 Thomas
 
 Regarding your question, why the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu is returned as
 source component. Well
 
 On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks for your response.  I downloaded the nightly yesterday and am
 seeing
 strange behavior.
 
  I tried adding an action listener to the navigationMenuItem and the event
 I
 get in my listener gives me the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu object as the source
 instead of the MenuItem itself, so I can't determine which item was
 selected.  The strange thing is that the getValue method of the
 HtmlCommandJSCookMenu returns the label of the selected item.  I hate to
 have to switch on the label though, because it's bound to change.
 
  Is this working as intended?
 
  Thanks,
  Richard
 
 
  
 From: Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:25:46 -0200
  To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
  not.
  You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has
 actionListener feature.
 
 
  On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
 Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem?  If
 not,
  is there a way to achieve the same result?
 
  thanks.
 
 
 
 
  --
  Dudu
  `P
 
 
 
 --
 http://www.irian.at
 
 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German
 
 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
 
 
 
 
 --
 http://www.irian.at
 
 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German
 
 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-07 Thread Richard Frazer 
Title: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param



Thanks for your response. I downloaded the nightly yesterday and am seeing strange behavior.

I tried adding an action listener to the navigationMenuItem and the event I get in my listener gives me the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu object as the source instead of the MenuItem itself, so I cant determine which item was selected. The strange thing is that the getValue method of the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu returns the label of the selected item. I hate to have to switch on the label though, because its bound to change.

Is this working as intended?

Thanks,
Richard


From: Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:25:46 -0200
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

not.
You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has actionListener feature.


On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem? If not, 
is there a way to achieve the same result?

thanks.




-- 
Dudu 
`P

Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-07 Thread Thomas Spiegl 
ty richard - this is a bug. I just fixed this issue. The item's value
will be returned again instead of the label. I think most of us are
using NavigationMenuItem(s) to create the entire menu tree.
NavigationMenuItem is not an UIComponent, that's why it can't be
passed by the event.

regards
Thomas

Regarding your question, why the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu is returned as
source component. Well

On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks for your response.  I downloaded the nightly yesterday and am seeing
 strange behavior.

  I tried adding an action listener to the navigationMenuItem and the event I
 get in my listener gives me the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu object as the source
 instead of the MenuItem itself, so I can't determine which item was
 selected.  The strange thing is that the getValue method of the
 HtmlCommandJSCookMenu returns the label of the selected item.  I hate to
 have to switch on the label though, because it's bound to change.

  Is this working as intended?

  Thanks,
  Richard


  
 From: Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:25:46 -0200
  To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

  not.
  You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has
 actionListener feature.


  On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

 Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem?  If not,
  is there a way to achieve the same result?

  thanks.




  --
  Dudu
  `P



--
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-07 Thread Thomas Spiegl 
You can choose between 2 tags to create the menu tree:

a) t:navigationMenuItem itemLabel=... action=... /
This tag creates an UINavigationMenuItem component. Perfect, this one
could be passed to the ActionListener

b) t:navigationMenuItems value=#{...}
where the value binds a List of NavigationMenuItem(s) (remember a
NavigationMenuItem is not a component). As no component will be
generated for a NavigationMenuItem in the render phase, the only
component that can be passed to the ActionListener is the menu itself.

Thomas

On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks Thomas.  I'll grab the nightly tomorrow and try it out.

 What do you mean that most of you are using the NavigationMenuItem(s) to
 create the entire menu tree?  Does that mean you aren't using the jscookMenu
 tag, but some other tag?  Does this allow you to achieve the parameter
 passing approach?

 If there is a best practice type of approach that I'm not using, I would
 love to hear it.

 Thanks,
 Richard



  From: Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:49:18 +0100
  To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
  ty richard - this is a bug. I just fixed this issue. The item's value
  will be returned again instead of the label. I think most of us are
  using NavigationMenuItem(s) to create the entire menu tree.
  NavigationMenuItem is not an UIComponent, that's why it can't be
  passed by the event.
 
  regards
  Thomas
 
  Regarding your question, why the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu is returned as
  source component. Well
 
  On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Thanks for your response.  I downloaded the nightly yesterday and am 
  seeing
  strange behavior.
 
   I tried adding an action listener to the navigationMenuItem and the event 
  I
  get in my listener gives me the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu object as the source
  instead of the MenuItem itself, so I can't determine which item was
  selected.  The strange thing is that the getValue method of the
  HtmlCommandJSCookMenu returns the label of the selected item.  I hate to
  have to switch on the label though, because it's bound to change.
 
   Is this working as intended?
 
   Thanks,
   Richard
 
 
   
  From: Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
   Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:25:46 -0200
   To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
   Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
   not.
   You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has
  actionListener feature.
 
 
   On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
  Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem?  If 
  not,
   is there a way to achieve the same result?
 
   thanks.
 
 
 
 
   --
   Dudu
   `P
 
 
 
  --
  http://www.irian.at
 
  Your JSF powerhouse -
  JSF Consulting, Development and
  Courses in English and German
 
  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces




--
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

RE: JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-07 Thread Richard Frazer 
I actually had it like your example a, except instead of an action, I defined 
and actionListener.  This is where the source component was the menu and not 
the UINavigationMenuItem, as I would have expected.  I'll try it with the next 
nightly build and let you know how that works.

thanks.
Richard


-Original Message-
From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 2/7/2006 6:09 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
You can choose between 2 tags to create the menu tree:

a) t:navigationMenuItem itemLabel=... action=... /
This tag creates an UINavigationMenuItem component. Perfect, this one
could be passed to the ActionListener

b) t:navigationMenuItems value=#{...}
where the value binds a List of NavigationMenuItem(s) (remember a
NavigationMenuItem is not a component). As no component will be
generated for a NavigationMenuItem in the render phase, the only
component that can be passed to the ActionListener is the menu itself.

Thomas

On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks Thomas.  I'll grab the nightly tomorrow and try it out.

 What do you mean that most of you are using the NavigationMenuItem(s) to
 create the entire menu tree?  Does that mean you aren't using the jscookMenu
 tag, but some other tag?  Does this allow you to achieve the parameter
 passing approach?

 If there is a best practice type of approach that I'm not using, I would
 love to hear it.

 Thanks,
 Richard



  From: Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:49:18 +0100
  To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
  Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
  ty richard - this is a bug. I just fixed this issue. The item's value
  will be returned again instead of the label. I think most of us are
  using NavigationMenuItem(s) to create the entire menu tree.
  NavigationMenuItem is not an UIComponent, that's why it can't be
  passed by the event.
 
  regards
  Thomas
 
  Regarding your question, why the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu is returned as
  source component. Well
 
  On 2/7/06, Richard Frazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Thanks for your response.  I downloaded the nightly yesterday and am 
  seeing
  strange behavior.
 
   I tried adding an action listener to the navigationMenuItem and the event 
  I
  get in my listener gives me the HtmlCommandJSCookMenu object as the source
  instead of the MenuItem itself, so I can't determine which item was
  selected.  The strange thing is that the getValue method of the
  HtmlCommandJSCookMenu returns the label of the selected item.  I hate to
  have to switch on the label though, because it's bound to change.
 
   Is this working as intended?
 
   Thanks,
   Richard
 
 
   
  From: Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
   Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:25:46 -0200
   To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
   Subject: Re: JSCookMenu and f:param
 
   not.
   You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has
  actionListener feature.
 
 
   On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
  Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem?  If 
  not,
   is there a way to achieve the same result?
 
   thanks.
 
 
 
 
   --
   Dudu
   `P
 
 
 
  --
  http://www.irian.at
 
  Your JSF powerhouse -
  JSF Consulting, Development and
  Courses in English and German
 
  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces




--
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-06 Thread Richard Frazer 
Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem?  If not,
is there a way to achieve the same result?

thanks.

Re: JSCookMenu and f:param

2006-02-06 Thread Eduardo Dudu Ivan Pichler 
not.You need to use the nightly build of navigationMenuItem, such has actionListener feature.On 2/6/06, Richard Frazer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Is f:param supported in tandem with jsookMenu/navigationMenuItem?If not,
is there a way to achieve the same result?thanks.-- Dudu `P