Oh, again, this debate always goes on and on :)
Guys, try ZFS yourselves and come back here :)
You obviously haven't seen ARC caching in action. You haven't played
with snapshots. You haven't seen what the online compression can do.
Etc., etc., etc.
There's lots to ZFS, which neither BTRFS
Greetings,
- Original Message -
There's lots to ZFS, which neither BTRFS will ever even remotely
approach.
Not really. That isn't to say that btrfs is done or that all of its features,
especially those added much later in the development cycle, are stable. So, I
don't contend that
Well, innovation isn't about matching features that someone else has
just for the sake of having them too, is it? :)
What lot of people are missing about ZFS is that it is a self-contained
project trying to solve real storage problems. It's not trying to be a
filesystem. It is a complete storage
Hello!
Pavel! Awesome!
Please add one killer feature about ZFS - compete support for SSD with
TRIM and not-killing-this-sector-by-thousands-writes :)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Pavel Snajdr li...@snajpa.net wrote:
Well, innovation isn't about matching features that someone else has
On 11/13/2014 11:20 PM, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
On 11/13/2014 12:52 PM, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
Hello!
Pavel! Awesome!
Please add one killer feature about ZFS - compete support for SSD with
TRIM and not-killing-this-sector-by-thousands-writes :)
Actually ZoL doesn't support TRIM, neither does
Hello!
I created comparison table for answer to your question:
https://github.com/pavel-odintsov/OpenVZ_ZFS/blob/master/openvz_storage_backends.md
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Scott Dowdle dow...@montanalinux.org wrote:
Greetings,
- Original Message -
Tonight I tested and
Well, good beginning, but..
as we discussed earlier:
in most cases of hosting purposes users need quotes. And quotes work
only with ext4. So the only real possible case of usage is ploop over
zfs and the only good reason to have zfs here is l2arc cache on ssd or
large amount SSD disks in raidz3
Thank you for suggestion! Just added!
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:20 PM, CoolCold coolthec...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you should add some links for general zfs-on-linux with openvz
install / setup guide, to help people who will be inspired by your readme
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Pavel
Scott Dowdle mailto:dow...@montanalinux.org
Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:48 PM
Greetings,
- Original Message -
Performance issues aren't the only problem ploop solves... it also
solves the changing inode issue. When a container is migrated from one
host to another with simfs,
When you need quotes and there is only one way to get them...
I don't think ploop is about to solve ext4 troubles. I's just solve some
troubles (which are common to a lot of file systems).
ZFS in this case is more alternative to Parallels Cloud Storage which is
closed source and hard to get even
Parallels Cloud Storage is not an real filesystem in old filesystems
terms, it based on ext4 locally and provides only remote features like
redundancy and multi level caching.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Nick Knutov m...@knutov.com wrote:
When you need quotes and there is only one way to
Nick Knutov mailto:m...@knutov.com
Wednesday, November 12, 2014 3:40 PM
ZFS in this case is more alternative to Parallels Cloud Storage which is
closed source and hard to get even for money (I contacted Parallels
sales several times and never got the pricelist from them).
Also, ZFS is good
Oh. I missed this.
13.11.2014 2:28, Devon B. пишет:
I don't think you can just run ploop over ZFS. Ploop requires ext4 as
the host filesystem according to bug 2277:
https://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2277
--
Best Regards,
Nick Knutov
http://knutov.com
ICQ: 272873706
Voice:
13 matches
Mail list logo
