On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Elad Ben Aharon wrote:
> Hi,
> Answer inline
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Stefano Bovina wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> does a storage best practise document for oVirt exist?
>>
>>
>> Some examples:
>>
>> oVirt allows to extend
Sorry for that, I haven't checked.
I've replaced the log file with a new version which should work i hope.
Many Thanks.
Regards,
Arsène
On 06/12/2017 02:33 PM, Martin Sivak wrote:
I am sorry to say so, but it seems the log archive is corrupted. I
can't open it.
Regards
Martin Sivak
On
Currently all our scripts are python2-based, not sure if running them
with Python3 would need a major change, but currently we're happy with
Python2. I'm still not clear if this is a bug or an additional option
should be supplied in order to make this work.
Thanks.
El 2017-06-12 14:48,
Hi,
I created a new host to deploy a hosted engine, and then used a backup
from the bare metal engine and restored this, as per the procedure in:
http://www.ovirt.org/documentation/self-hosted/chap-Migrating_from_Bare_Metal_to_an_EL-Based_Self-Hosted_Environment/
Everything worked fine up until
Hi arsene,
See my comments inline
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Arsène Gschwind
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Our setup looks like:
>
> - 2 clusters in 2 different site connected with 10GBit LAN
> - Storage based on FC SAN replicated on both site and available for both
> site
On 06/13/2017 01:58 PM, nico...@devels.es wrote:
> Currently all our scripts are python2-based, not sure if running them
> with Python3 would need a major change, but currently we're happy with
> Python2. I'm still not clear if this is a bug or an additional option
> should be supplied in order to
El 2017-06-13 13:30, Juan Hernández escribió:
On 06/13/2017 01:58 PM, nico...@devels.es wrote:
Currently all our scripts are python2-based, not sure if running them
with Python3 would need a major change, but currently we're happy with
Python2. I'm still not clear if this is a bug or an
Hello.
I had a previous Datacenter and Cluster with a Host in it which I have
removed completelly from oVirt Engine. In order to remove I did the
following steps:
- Removed all Virtual Machines on the top of the Host
- Put the only Local Datastore in Maintenence mode (It didn't allow to
Replying on my own email.
I managed to add the host again but had to do some very manual steps:
- Removed /etc/vdsm/vdsm.id from the Host
- engine=# select vds_id from vds_static where host_name = 'host.name';
- engine=# delete from vds_statistics where vds_id = 'host.name.uuid';
- engine=#
Hello Rizwan,
The upgrade from 3.6 to 4.0 involves installing a new O/S
for the engine and restoring from a backup of the 3.6 system, could you set up
a new machine (physical or VM) and restore from backups then migrate later into
hosted engine setup?
Are there any shops or folks on this list that provide 3rd party support
for oVirt?
Support via email, remote login or phone/skype etc?
Not looking for or asking about free support.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
Il 14 Giu 2017 04:50, ha scritto:
Are there any shops or folks on this list that provide 3rd party support
for oVirt?
Support via email, remote login or phone/skype etc?
Not looking for or asking about free support.
Did you consider getting 24/7 support from Red Hat
No I have not looked at Red Hat, I just assumed it would be too
expensive/out of my price range.
I looked on this page, which one is it?
https://www.redhat.com/en/store/all-products
On 2017-06-13 22:15, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 14 Giu 2017 04:50, ha scritto:
I've created a VM using a template imported from a Fedora 24 image in
the repository. Now that it is created, what credentials do I use to
log into it from the console?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
I just got bitten by this particular problem, on a heavily used disk image. I'm
trying to defragment the disk images. Hop this will help.
> Le 8 juin 2017 à 07:19, Markus Stockhausen a écrit :
>
> Hi Fernando,
>
> we personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2
Hi,
When installing an ovirt host I got these routes automatically added
default dev ovirtmgmt table 2886865805 scope link
172.18.19.128/26 via 172.18.19.141 dev ovirtmgmt table 2886865805
What is their intended purpose? It seems to be stopping packets from being
correctly routed to the
Hi Fernando,
The second option is the right one.
A Host with local storage should be in its own local data canter.
Regards,
Idan
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, FERNANDO FREDIANI <
fernando.fredi...@upx.com> wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> I have here a scenario where I have one Datacenter and
Hi Folks,
I just got the go ahead to install oVirt to use as a lab.
The servers are:
1xdl360 4x30010k in raid 10 for OS (Manager) should this be clustered with
another server for resiliency
5xdl380 2x30010k for OS 6x1TB7.2k RAID5 on each for a data store
It will all be behind a proxy and be
18 matches
Mail list logo