a new RFC that we do not support currently, but
would we be able to provide in any future?
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Fernando Frediani*
Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing
per VLAN
, but would we be
>> able to provide in any future?
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Fernando Frediani <
>> <mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br
>> <mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>>
>&g
warded message --
From: *Fernando Frediani* mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>>
Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing
per VLAN
To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Hello,
In VMware
> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
> To: users@ovirt.org
>
>
> Hello,
>
> In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each
> Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to te
this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be
able to provide in any future?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fernando Frediani
Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
To: users@ovirt.org
Hello,
In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each
Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the
physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily
and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain
VLANs (Ma
Hello,
In VMware it is possible to bound two network interfaces and for each
Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the
physical interfaces you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which
stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs
(Management, Liv
7 matches
Mail list logo
