Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-19 Thread Karli Sjöberg
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 10:39 -0400, Ted Miller wrote:
 On 3/18/2014 6:29 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
  we are brainstorming on what should we change in the oVirt UI for 4.0.
  for current brainstorming phase, anything goes - i.e., I'd like us to 
  ignore current limitations and flows, and envision/fantasize the perfect 
  solution.
 
  SO - what do YOU think we should consider for 4.0 UI concept, flows, etc.
 I have an idea, though it may be relevant only to smaller setups.
 
 I would like one place that I can go and see the health of my system. Right 
 now I am running a cluster in test mode, and I have to look at several places 
 before I have confidence that all is well:
 Data Center
 Storage (I am using gluster)
 Hosts
 VMs
 
 The natural place for me to look would seem to be the left bar. If the icons 
 there had a color change to reflect status, I could just hit Expand All and 
 the color would immediately tell me the system status. Same icons would work, 
 with just a background or little square of color.
 
 I realize that my little 3-host system is the exception, because (so far) I 
 can hit Expand all and I can still see the whole thing. I will not have to 
 deploy many more VMs before it will not all fit.
 
 There may be a better way to do this, e.g. another choice between Expand 
 all and Collapse All that would expand all except the lowest level. It 
 would then show me categories like Storage, Networks, Hosts, Volumes 
 and VMs with a health color indication for each cluster. If I see anything 
 I am not expecting, I can expand that heading and see the status of the 
 individual items.
 
 There may be a better way to do this, but I know that it is somewhat 
 frustrating to check first thing in the morning and have to do some many 
 clicks before I have confidence that nothing bad happened overnight. I have 
 actually found it faster to click on the Events tab and see if there are 
 any nasty messages there, rather than checking current status.
 
 I look forward to the insights of others as to how they monitor cluster 
 status.

+1 Really clever, I like:)

Perhaps just change the default of of the left bar to have some of the
top-level branches already expanded, like:

ˇ System
  ˇ Data Centers
ˇ MyDC
   Storage
   Network
   Clusters

With some indication of how they´re doing, to get a good health
overview. Maybe just use one of the standard exclamation marks, like
what´s attached in the mail?

/K

 
 Ted Miller
 Elkhart, IN, USA
 
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@ovirt.org
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

attachment: Screenshot.png___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-19 Thread René Koch


On 03/18/2014 03:12 PM, Ernest Beinrohr wrote:

Dňa 18.03.2014 11:29, Itamar Heim wrote / napísal(a):

Hi,

we are brainstorming on what should we change in the oVirt UI for 4.0.
for current brainstorming phase, anything goes - i.e., I'd like us
to ignore current limitations and flows, and envision/fantasize the
perfect solution.


Anything goes is great - so here's what came in mind :)

I would love to be able to use drag and drop in the gui. E.g. Drag and 
drop an vm selected in Virtual Machines tab to an host in the left 
system navigation menu. Or drag and drop it on Templates tab and the New 
Template window appears.


It would be cool if help would be available. When I installed oVirt 3.4 
I discovered a subtab Affinity Groups for my vms and I had no clue 
what I could do with this feature. So I visited oVirt wiki and searched 
for Affinity Groups and now I know what this is all about. But if a 
small ? button would be available in the right upper corner of this 
tab explaining this feature in 1-2 sentences and giving a link to a 
detailed documentation page would help for non-experienced users/admins 
(online in oVirt wiki or offline shipped with oVirt).


Furthermore I would love to be able to use ui plugins for User portal as 
well...


What about a tab Logs where I could access engine.log file? At the 
moment I have to switch to console to be able to get more detailed 
information about an error and use search bar to find the corresponding 
line.




SO - what do YOU think we should consider for 4.0 UI concept, flows, etc.


I'd love to see this in the UI:

- auto-refreshed screenshots from the VMs consoles.
- some improved tagging/grouping


What about adding the possibility to create a tab out of a bookmark? I'm 
thinking of the following: Add a bookmark which displays all VMs 
belonging to Datacenter A and a bookmark which displays all VMs 
belonging to Datacenter B. So for me it would be cool if I would have a 
new main tab VMs in DC A and VMs in DC B - so I don't have to switch 
from System menu to Bookmarks menu, but can customize main tabs to best 
fit into my environment.



- customizable columns with sorting/filtering (tags ?)


This would be cool.
I would love to be able to sort or enable/disable certain columns. E.g. 
FQDN column is pretty useless for me as the vm name already contains the 
FQDN in my setup. It would be cool if it would be possible for each user 
to create his view and have this saved.



- cpu/disk/net utilization column like virt-manger has them


It would be great if I could add columns using ui plugins.
So e.g. I remove FQDN, Display, Status columns, but add my custom one 
with the monitoring status or I can add my custom graphs based on my 
monitoring system (or whatever) in addition or instead of the defined 
CPU/Memory/Network columns...



- embedded serial console
- disk operations and migration status with progress bar and ETA.


Vote for this as well.


- console access from client-engine-host. Most of the time we do not
have direct access to the hosts.
- ability to define exclude entities ( aka these 2 vms may never run on
the same storage and host )


--
Ernest Beinrohr, AXON PRO
Ing http://www.beinrohr.sk/ing.php, RHCE
http://www.beinrohr.sk/rhce.php, RHCVA
http://www.beinrohr.sk/rhce.php, LPIC
http://www.beinrohr.sk/lpic.php, VCA http://www.beinrohr.sk/vca.php,
+421-2--6241-0360 callto://+421-2--6241-0360, +421-903--482-603
callto://+421-903--482-603
icq:28153343, gtalk: oer...@axonpro.sk, jabber:oer...@jabber.org

“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.” Richard Feynman


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-18 Thread Sven Kieske
Hi,

well basically the left pane, where I have to click through
system-DC-etc is plain useless to me.

I always go via the top tabs and then select the sub entity
I want to have.

So there are to many ways you can configure the same setting.

Example:
Adding a logical network

You can click:

System-Your_DC-Networks-...wait..for..loading..-New
or
System then click the Networks tab
(you have no long loading animation! :) ) - New
(now you have of course to select the correct DC).

the latter is faster.

So I would omit this whole tree style stuff and just
kick it out.

It's not fast, and you often have to click through the tree
so I use just System selected in the tree and then select
the tabs I want.

Additional confusion:

When you did not select system and then want to use the
main tabs, you get just displayed what is appropriate for
the sub-tree of system..

It's just plain useless duplication of functionality imho.

Am 18.03.2014 11:29, schrieb Itamar Heim:
 Hi,
 
 we are brainstorming on what should we change in the oVirt UI for 4.0.
 for current brainstorming phase, anything goes - i.e., I'd like us to
 ignore current limitations and flows, and envision/fantasize the
 perfect solution.
 
 SO - what do YOU think we should consider for 4.0 UI concept, flows, etc.
 
 Thanks,
Itamar
 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@ovirt.org
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 
 
 

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards

Sven Kieske

Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH  Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-18 Thread Jiri Belka
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:47:16 +
Sven Kieske s.kie...@mittwald.de wrote:

 So there are to many ways you can configure the same setting.

100% agree, duplicity between the tree and main tabs is crazy.

If I could wish anything, I would keep the tree but I would make it
more nice and clever - one tree for physical schema, another one for
virtual schema (minic tagging, creating groups for related things).

Plus I would like to have right pane to show me quickly general
overview about things selected in left tree (example: If I would be in
a virtual folder called 'webapp' consisting of couple of related VMs, I
would love to see in right pane the list of VMs, graphs about CPU
usage, network usage, storage usage...; more details about the objects
could be implemented in some tab inside right pane - example: default
right pane would display info as written above, but details about CPU,
storage would be in separate tabs...).

However, bad decision would be like nightmare for ages, one likes main
tabs, another one likes the tree :)

j.
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-18 Thread Federico Alberto Sayd

On 18/03/14 07:47, Sven Kieske wrote:

Hi,

well basically the left pane, where I have to click through
system-DC-etc is plain useless to me.

I always go via the top tabs and then select the sub entity
I want to have.

So there are to many ways you can configure the same setting.

Example:
Adding a logical network

You can click:

System-Your_DC-Networks-...wait..for..loading..-New
or
System then click the Networks tab
(you have no long loading animation! :) ) - New
(now you have of course to select the correct DC).

the latter is faster.

So I would omit this whole tree style stuff and just
kick it out.

It's not fast, and you often have to click through the tree
so I use just System selected in the tree and then select
the tabs I want.

Additional confusion:

When you did not select system and then want to use the
main tabs, you get just displayed what is appropriate for
the sub-tree of system..

It's just plain useless duplication of functionality imho.

Am 18.03.2014 11:29, schrieb Itamar Heim:


I agree, the plenty of tabs at any level is confusing.

Also would be nice to add views to left panel: VM's view, Storage View, 
network view. I think that the left panel should be more clear or to 
have a option to filter the stuff that it displays

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-18 Thread Ernest Beinrohr

Dn(a 18.03.2014 11:29, Itamar Heim wrote / napísal(a):

Hi,

we are brainstorming on what should we change in the oVirt UI for 4.0.
for current brainstorming phase, anything goes - i.e., I'd like us 
to ignore current limitations and flows, and envision/fantasize the 
perfect solution.


SO - what do YOU think we should consider for 4.0 UI concept, flows, etc.


I'd love to see this in the UI:

- auto-refreshed screenshots from the VMs consoles.
- some improved tagging/grouping
- customizable columns with sorting/filtering (tags ?)
- cpu/disk/net utilization column like virt-manger has them
- embedded serial console
- disk operations and migration status with progress bar and ETA.
- console access from client-engine-host. Most of the time we do not 
have direct access to the hosts.
- ability to define exclude entities ( aka these 2 vms may never run on 
the same storage and host )



--
Ernest Beinrohr, AXON PRO
Ing http://www.beinrohr.sk/ing.php, RHCE 
http://www.beinrohr.sk/rhce.php, RHCVA 
http://www.beinrohr.sk/rhce.php, LPIC 
http://www.beinrohr.sk/lpic.php, VCA http://www.beinrohr.sk/vca.php, 
+421-2--6241-0360 callto://+421-2--6241-0360, +421-903--482-603 
callto://+421-903--482-603

icq:28153343, gtalk: oer...@axonpro.sk, jabber:oer...@jabber.org

For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public 
relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. Richard Feynman
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-18 Thread Sven Kieske
Well I'd have some privacy concerns regarding this feature..
it might not even be useful if users are logged in via ssh
/different ttys etc.

Am 18.03.2014 15:12, schrieb Ernest Beinrohr:
 - auto-refreshed screenshots from the VMs consoles.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards

Sven Kieske

Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH  Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-18 Thread Sven Kieske


Am 18.03.2014 14:31, schrieb Jiri Belka:
 100% agree, duplicity between the tree and main tabs is crazy.

Well I would also use the tree if it is fast enough.
Just don't duplicate logic if not necessary, as it's just confusing
even experienced users.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards

Sven Kieske

Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH  Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] [RFI] GUI Changes for oVirt 4.0

2014-03-18 Thread Ted Miller

On 3/18/2014 6:29 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:

we are brainstorming on what should we change in the oVirt UI for 4.0.
for current brainstorming phase, anything goes - i.e., I'd like us to 
ignore current limitations and flows, and envision/fantasize the perfect 
solution.


SO - what do YOU think we should consider for 4.0 UI concept, flows, etc.

I have an idea, though it may be relevant only to smaller setups.

I would like one place that I can go and see the health of my system. Right 
now I am running a cluster in test mode, and I have to look at several places 
before I have confidence that all is well:

Data Center
Storage (I am using gluster)
Hosts
VMs

The natural place for me to look would seem to be the left bar. If the icons 
there had a color change to reflect status, I could just hit Expand All and 
the color would immediately tell me the system status. Same icons would work, 
with just a background or little square of color.


I realize that my little 3-host system is the exception, because (so far) I 
can hit Expand all and I can still see the whole thing. I will not have to 
deploy many more VMs before it will not all fit.


There may be a better way to do this, e.g. another choice between Expand 
all and Collapse All that would expand all except the lowest level. It 
would then show me categories like Storage, Networks, Hosts, Volumes 
and VMs with a health color indication for each cluster. If I see anything 
I am not expecting, I can expand that heading and see the status of the 
individual items.


There may be a better way to do this, but I know that it is somewhat 
frustrating to check first thing in the morning and have to do some many 
clicks before I have confidence that nothing bad happened overnight. I have 
actually found it faster to click on the Events tab and see if there are 
any nasty messages there, rather than checking current status.


I look forward to the insights of others as to how they monitor cluster status.

Ted Miller
Elkhart, IN, USA

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users