On Jan 18, 2018 5:29 PM, "Jayme" wrote:
> I'm still deciding on storage solutions and have not made up my mind yet.
> GlusterFS may be an option but I'm not sure about performance and maintenance.
> It sounds to me like GlusterFS with secondary replicated gluster volume would
> work quite well as
On Jan 18, 2018 5:29 PM, "Jayme" wrote:
I'm still deciding on storage solutions and have not made up my mind yet.
GlusterFS may be an option but I'm not sure about performance and
maintenance. It sounds to me like GlusterFS with secondary replicated
gluster volume would work quite well as a disa
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Dan Yasny wrote:
>
>> If you are using NFS, you might find it easier and more efficient to use
>> a solution outside oVirt.
>>
>
> But how do you maintain crash consistency? I suspect using oVirt helps, in
I'm still deciding on storage solutions and have not made up my mind yet.
GlusterFS may be an option but I'm not sure about performance and
maintenance. It sounds to me like GlusterFS with secondary replicated
gluster volume would work quite well as a disaster recovery solution but
I'd also need h
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Dan Yasny wrote:
> If you are using NFS, you might find it easier and more efficient to use a
> solution outside oVirt.
>
But how do you maintain crash consistency? I suspect using oVirt helps, in
the sense that it enables fsfreeze (VSS). Otherwise, there's a goo
If you are using NFS, you might find it easier and more efficient to use a
solution outside oVirt.
I've documented an initial attempt at backing up machine images with backy2
at
https://dyasny.blogspot.ca/2017/06/exploring-backup-options-for-rhvovirt.html
It is harder to do with block storage and
6 matches
Mail list logo
