Re: Testing failover on dispatcher/java-broker cluster

2016-09-29 Thread Adel Boutros
They seem fair enough and quite related. As a side note, I have a bug with the dispatch router 0.6.1 but I haven't submitted it yet because I haven't reduced the test case yet. In resume, when I connect 2 dispatchers (inter-router) and then delete the connector/listener of "inter-router". If

Re: Testing failover on dispatcher/java-broker cluster

2016-09-29 Thread Ted Ross
Sorry, those Jira numbers and descriptions are mismatched. Here's the correct list: - DISPATCH-496 - Activation of an autolink does not result in issuing credit to a blocked sender - DISPATCH-505 - Eventual loss of credit on inter-router control

Re: Testing failover on dispatcher/java-broker cluster

2016-09-29 Thread Ted Ross
On 09/29/2016 10:47 AM, Adel Boutros wrote: They seem fair enough and quite related. As a side note, I have a bug with the dispatch router 0.6.1 but I haven't submitted it yet because I haven't reduced the test case yet. In resume, when I connect 2 dispatchers (inter-router) and then

link delivery priority

2016-09-29 Thread Matt Broadstone
Hi, I'm trying to set up two concurrent receiver links on the same broker: one to listen to messages from a queue (e.g. `test.queue`) as a consumer/worker, another to listen to the same queue but with a distribution mode of `copy` in order to passively track some information without corrupting

Re: Testing failover on dispatcher/java-broker cluster

2016-09-29 Thread Ted Ross
On 09/24/2016 05:32 AM, Adel Boutros wrote: We are indeed in favor of a minor release as long as the latest version is still 0.6.x and we are willing to re-launch our tests and give feedback on the release candidate once provided (It shouldn't take us more than a day to compile and test). Do

Re: link delivery priority

2016-09-29 Thread Matt Broadstone
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 29/09/16 15:43, Matt Broadstone wrote: > >> I'm trying to set up two concurrent receiver links on the same broker: >> one >> to listen to messages from a queue (e.g. `test.queue`) as a >> consumer/worker, another to listen

Re: link delivery priority

2016-09-29 Thread Gordon Sim
On 29/09/16 15:43, Matt Broadstone wrote: I'm trying to set up two concurrent receiver links on the same broker: one to listen to messages from a queue (e.g. `test.queue`) as a consumer/worker, another to listen to the same queue but with a distribution mode of `copy` in order to passively