They cannot (do not want, do not have the know how) study the e-mails, and
therefore they cannot build a reliable corpus. All they can do is to trust the
ability of their users to study their own e-mails well enough to do the job,
hence the mess with ham/spam when feeding the Bayesian filter. Th
Hi everyone,
The Travel Assistance Committee has asked the various Apache Project
Management Committees to forward the following announcement to the user and
dev mailing lists:
---
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that travel
assistance appli
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:02:46 +
Horváth Szabolcs wrote:
> One more question: is there a recommended ham to spam ratio? 1:1?
No, this is a myth. Bayes computes token probabilities from a token's
frequencies in spam and ham, so it all scales through. If you have
2000 ham and 200 spam the prob
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:02:46 +
Horváth Szabolcs wrote:
One more question: is there a recommended ham to spam ratio? 1:1?
On 14.02.18 15:09, RW wrote:
No, this is a myth. Bayes computes token probabilities from a token's
frequencies in spam and ham, so it all scales through. If you have
20
On 02/14/2018 09:20 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:02:46 +
Horváth Szabolcs wrote:
One more question: is there a recommended ham to spam ratio? 1:1?
On 14.02.18 15:09, RW wrote:
No, this is a myth. Bayes computes token probabilities from a token's
frequencies in
On 2018-02-13 (14:45 MST), Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 13.02.2018 um 21:21 schrieb @lbutlr:
>> 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
>> blocked.
>> See
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklis
On 2/14/2018 11:16 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
Ah, I didn't know URIBL was a blacklist, I thought it was being used as a
generic abbreviation variant of RBL.
I can't imagine why i'd be over limit, my mail server is tiny.
It's confusing, I agree. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-267?j
Am 14.02.2018 um 17:16 schrieb @lbutlr:
> I can't imagine why i'd be over limit, my mail server is tiny.
its not the mailserver that got blocked by limits, but the dns resolver
your mailserver uses!
If you're using a 3rd party resolver (ex the ones from your provider or
8.8.8.8) you can hit the
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Tobi wrote:
Am 14.02.2018 um 17:16 schrieb @lbutlr:
I can't imagine why i'd be over limit, my mail server is tiny.
its not the mailserver that got blocked by limits, but the dns resolver
your mailserver uses!
If you're using a 3rd party resolver (ex the ones from your p
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:20:30 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:02:46 +
> >Horváth Szabolcs wrote:
> >> One more question: is there a recommended ham to spam ratio? 1:1?
>
> On 14.02.18 15:09, RW wrote:
> >No, this is a myth. Bayes computes token probabilities
On 2018-02-14 (09:55 MST), Tobi wrote:
>
> Am 14.02.2018 um 17:16 schrieb @lbutlr:
>> I can't imagine why i'd be over limit, my mail server is tiny.
>
> its not the mailserver that got blocked by limits, but the dns resolver
> your mailserver uses!
I use my own DNS on Bind 9.12, however the blo
Is there any "relativelly easy" way to add a new IP found in a non-standard
header to the IPs checks (e.g. DNSRBL)??? plugin is the only way?
Thanks.
--PedroD
12 matches
Mail list logo
