Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-08 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018, Zinski, Steve wrote: > The trouble with this is that you would be adding 10 point to anything > with a bitcoin address whether anything's obfuscated or not. If you want > to avoid this take a look at the FUZZY_* rules. Well, actually, no. I sent you a snippet of my

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-07 Thread Zinski, Steve
> The trouble with this is that you would be adding 10 point to anything > with a bitcoin address whether anything's obfuscated or not. If you want > to avoid this take a look at the FUZZY_* rules. Well, actually, no. I sent you a snippet of my rule and inflated the score to 10 for

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-06 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, Pedro David Marco wrote: On Saturday, October 6, 2018, 8:36:11 PM GMT+2, John Hardin wrote: The version of this in my sandbox doesn't have that weakness. I did some  tuning compared to what Steve proposed. John, would it be possible for you to share with us those

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-06 Thread Pedro David Marco
On Saturday, October 6, 2018, 8:36:11 PM GMT+2, John Hardin wrote: >The version of this in my sandbox doesn't have that weakness. I did some  >tuning compared to what Steve proposed. John, would it be possible for you to share with us those improvments??? Thanks, PedroD

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-06 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018, RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:34:51 + Zinski, Steve wrote: Here's how I'm blocking bitcoin emails with Unicode characters embedded: body__BTC1 /\b[13][a-km-zA-HJ-NP-Z1-9]{25,34}\b/ body__BTC2 /\b\W*b\W*i\W*t\W*c\W*o\W*i\W*n\W*\b/i body

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-06 Thread RW
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:34:51 + Zinski, Steve wrote: > Here's how I'm blocking bitcoin emails with Unicode characters > embedded: > > body__BTC1 /\b[13][a-km-zA-HJ-NP-Z1-9]{25,34}\b/ > body__BTC2 /\b\W*b\W*i\W*t\W*c\W*o\W*i\W*n\W*\b/i > body__BTC3

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-06 Thread Rupert Gallagher
You did well. Not perfect, but nearly there. The key words here are: dynamic, helo, from and to. No need to use a black list. The message was sent from a dynamic IP. No reputable email server does that. The next reason to reject is the failure of SPF. The recipient should implement SPF

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread David Jones
On 10/5/18 4:38 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Friday 05 October 2018 at 23:26:12, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > >>> https://pastebin.com/TRD7FzRQ >>> >>> I have a sample here >> >> There are at least three reasons to reject that e-mail upfront, with no >> need to parse its body. > > Hints might be

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 05 October 2018 at 23:26:12, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > > https://pastebin.com/TRD7FzRQ > > > > I have a sample here > > There are at least three reasons to reject that e-mail upfront, with no > need to parse its body. Hints might be appreciated for the uninitiated. Antony. PS:

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread Rupert Gallagher
> https://pastebin.com/TRD7FzRQ > I have a sample here There are at least three reasons to reject that e-mail upfront, with no need to parse its body.

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Zinski, Steve wrote: Yes, absolutely. OK, cleaned up a bit and checked in. We'll see what masscheck thinks... On 10/5/18, 1:42 PM, "John Hardin" wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Zinski, Steve wrote: > Here's how I'm blocking bitcoin emails with Unicode characters

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: https://pastebin.com/TRD7FzRQ i have a sample here There doesn't appear to be any obfuscation (apart from the email address) in that message... -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread sebast...@debianfan.de
https://pastebin.com/TRD7FzRQ i have a sample here Am 05.10.2018 um 19:50 schrieb Zinski, Steve: Yes, absolutely. On 10/5/18, 1:42 PM, "John Hardin" wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Zinski, Steve wrote: > Here's how I'm blocking bitcoin emails with Unicode characters embedded:

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread Zinski, Steve
Yes, absolutely. On 10/5/18, 1:42 PM, "John Hardin" wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Zinski, Steve wrote: > Here's how I'm blocking bitcoin emails with Unicode characters embedded: > > body__BTC1 /\b[13][a-km-zA-HJ-NP-Z1-9]{25,34}\b/ > body__BTC2

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Zinski, Steve wrote: Here's how I'm blocking bitcoin emails with Unicode characters embedded: body__BTC1 /\b[13][a-km-zA-HJ-NP-Z1-9]{25,34}\b/ body__BTC2 /\b\W*b\W*i\W*t\W*c\W*o\W*i\W*n\W*\b/i body__BTC3 /\b\W*b\W*t\W*c\W*\b/i body

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread Zinski, Steve
Here's how I'm blocking bitcoin emails with Unicode characters embedded: body__BTC1 /\b[13][a-km-zA-HJ-NP-Z1-9]{25,34}\b/ body__BTC2 /\b\W*b\W*i\W*t\W*c\W*o\W*i\W*n\W*\b/i body__BTC3 /\b\W*b\W*t\W*c\W*\b/i body__BTC4

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Pedro David Marco wrote: >On Thursday, October 4, 2018, 9:08:10 PM GMT+2, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >Interesting.  Any chance for an unmodified pastebin spample? Yes please Joseph... any  change for it, please?  We are hungry...  Test rule checked into my sandbox last

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-05 Thread Pedro David Marco
>On Thursday, October 4, 2018, 9:08:10 PM GMT+2, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >Interesting.  Any chance for an unmodified pastebin spample? Yes please Joseph... any  change for it, please?  We are hungry...  ---PedroD

Re: Bitcoin update

2018-10-04 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Interesting. Any chance for an unmodified pastebin spample? On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 12:07 Joseph Brennan wrote: > > Two days ago the Bitcoin threats from Outlook.com started arriving in the > Windows-1256 charset, which is Arabic, but including Latin characters. The > text has Arabic character 9D