Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-13 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den mån 13 dec. 2021 kl 20:26 skrev Luke Mauldin : > Thank you for the information. I am hopeful that one of the outcomes the > log4j situation is that ASF project funding would be increased but I > suspect that thinking is naive. Companies have little incentive to invest > in something that

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-13 Thread Luke Mauldin
Thank you for the information. I am hopeful that one of the outcomes the log4j situation is that ASF project funding would be increased but I suspect that thinking is naive. Companies have little incentive to invest in something that “works well enough”. I too work for a company that has

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-13 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:37 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 07:14:46AM -0600, Luke Mauldin wrote: > > It looks like the stashing functionality is still experimental. Do you > > think there will be more funding in the future to complete it or do you > > think it may

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 07:14:46AM -0600, Luke Mauldin wrote: > It looks like the stashing functionality is still experimental. Do you think > there will be more funding in the future to complete it or do you think it > may remain unfinished for a long period of time? > I do not know any

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-13 Thread Luke Mauldin
It looks like the stashing functionality is still experimental. Do you think there will be more funding in the future to complete it or do you think it may remain unfinished for a long period of time? Luke > On Dec 13, 2021, at 2:42 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 07:21:44PM -0600, Luke Mauldin wrote: > That really is unfortunate to hear about the lack of funding. I see in the > past few years there has been a lot of work done on the conflict resolver in > version 10 and multiple stash implementations in versions 11+. Are those >

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-12 Thread Luke Mauldin
That really is unfortunate to hear about the lack of funding. I see in the past few years there has been a lot of work done on the conflict resolver in version 10 and multiple stash implementations in versions 11+. Are those efforts being driven by people just working on it in their “spare

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-11 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 06:59:31AM -0600, Luke Mauldin wrote: > Does the subversion project receive any funding from the ASF to hire > professional developers to complete more complex tasks or is development 100% > community driven and supported? The ASF does not pay anyone for development. I

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-11 Thread Luke Mauldin
Does the subversion project receive any funding from the ASF to hire professional developers to complete more complex tasks or is development 100% community driven and supported? > On Dec 11, 2021, at 4:10 AM, Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > >  > > > Den lör 11 dec. 2021 10:54Bo Berglund

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-11 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den lör 11 dec. 2021 10:54Bo Berglund skrev: > On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 07:59:02 -0600, Luke Mauldin > wrote: > > >Gotcha, thank you. > > > >> On Dec 10, 2021, at 7:14 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > >> > >> ?On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:12 AM Luke Mauldin > wrote: > >>> > >>> I noticed that the ASF is

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-11 Thread Bo Berglund
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 07:59:02 -0600, Luke Mauldin wrote: >Gotcha, thank you. > >> On Dec 10, 2021, at 7:14 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: >> >> ?On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:12 AM Luke Mauldin wrote: >>> >>> I noticed that the ASF is still running Subversion 1.9.x which was released >>> quite a few

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-10 Thread Luke Mauldin
Gotcha, thank you. > On Dec 10, 2021, at 7:14 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:12 AM Luke Mauldin wrote: >> >> I noticed that the ASF is still running Subversion 1.9.x which was released >> quite a few years ago. Does anyone know why they haven’t at least upgraded >>

Re: ASF Subversion version

2021-12-10 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:12 AM Luke Mauldin wrote: > > I noticed that the ASF is still running Subversion 1.9.x which was released > quite a few years ago. Does anyone know why they haven’t at least upgraded to > the 10.x LTS release which itself is over 2 years old at this point? ASF Infra