I was thinking about that but never tried as it doesn't seem intuitive
at all :) But thanks for the hint, I will refactor.
Adam
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Cezary Biernacki wrote:
> You can do:
>
> jsSupport.require("foo").invoke("myFunc").with("bar");
>
> Best regards,
> Cezary
>
>
> On Th
You can do:
jsSupport.require("foo").invoke("myFunc").with("bar");
Best regards,
Cezary
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Adam X wrote:
> Is there a reason this is not a fluid setter? Right now I have to do:
>
> Initialization foo = jsSupport.require("foo");
> foo.with("bar");
> foo.invoke("my
moveClass('loading');
}
});
-Original Message-
From: Adam X
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Thu, Sep 22, 2016 11:54 am
Subject: org.apache.tapestry5.services.javascript.Initialization.with(Object...
arguments)
Is there a reason this is not a fluid setter? Right now I have
Is there a reason this is not a fluid setter? Right now I have to do:
Initialization foo = jsSupport.require("foo");
foo.with("bar");
foo.invoke("myFunc");
I'd rather just do:
jsSupport.require("foo").with("bar").invoke("myFunc")
but with(Object...) returns void :(
Adam
-
