1983-01...@gmx.net wrote:
I have no usecase for this at the moment :-(, I only provide patches
for
stuff I suffer from at work.
The below looks like a use case to me.
As this [1] draft lays out Negotiate and Kerberos may apply to
connection or request level auth. We are just lucky that the f
> >>> I have no usecase for this at the moment :-(, I only provide patches
> for
> >>> stuff I suffer from at work.
> >>
> >> The below looks like a use case to me.
> >>
> >>> As this [1] draft lays out Negotiate and Kerberos may apply to
> >>> connection or request level auth. We are just lucky t
On 27/10/2012 19:32, Michael-O wrote:
> Am 2012-10-27 20:22, schrieb Mark Thomas:
>> On 27/10/2012 18:57, Michael-O wrote:
>>> Am 2012-10-27 19:25, schrieb Mark Thomas:
> Is this something worth being filed in Bugzilla as a longterm goal for
> Tomcat 8?
Sure, but without a propose
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:36 AM, ken dias wrote:
>
> Yes W8 is here but HPQ is still plummeting. Get rid of your CEO and get
> someone who can improve your stock price!
Que?
--
Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassa
Yes W8 is here but HPQ is still plummeting. Get rid of your CEO and get someone
who can improve your stock price!
> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:57:30 +0200
> From: 1983-01...@gmx.net
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Detect in an authenticator whether a connection is p
Am 2012-10-27 20:22, schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 27/10/2012 18:57, Michael-O wrote:
Am 2012-10-27 19:25, schrieb Mark Thomas:
Is this something worth being filed in Bugzilla as a longterm goal for
Tomcat 8?
Sure, but without a proposed patch I suspect it will sit there for a few
years and then cl
On 27/10/2012 18:57, Michael-O wrote:
> Am 2012-10-27 19:25, schrieb Mark Thomas:
>>> Is this something worth being filed in Bugzilla as a longterm goal for
>>> Tomcat 8?
>>
>> Sure, but without a proposed patch I suspect it will sit there for a few
>> years and then closed as WONTFIX. With a patch
Am 2012-10-27 19:25, schrieb Mark Thomas:
Is this something worth being filed in Bugzilla as a longterm goal for
Tomcat 8?
Sure, but without a proposed patch I suspect it will sit there for a few
years and then closed as WONTFIX. With a patch, it still might not get
fixed but at least you'll kn
On 27/10/2012 17:56, Michael-O wrote:
> Am 2012-10-27 18:38, schrieb Mark Thomas:
>> On 27/10/2012 16:28, Michael-O wrote:
>>> Am 2012-10-27 16:57, schrieb Mark Thomas:
>>
The only mechanism to maintain state between HTTP requests is the HTTP
session. You might be able to hack something t
Am 2012-10-27 18:38, schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 27/10/2012 16:28, Michael-O wrote:
Am 2012-10-27 16:57, schrieb Mark Thomas:
The only mechanism to maintain state between HTTP requests is the HTTP
session. You might be able to hack something together (in a non-portable
way) on a per connection ba
On 27/10/2012 16:28, Michael-O wrote:
> Am 2012-10-27 16:57, schrieb Mark Thomas:
>> The only mechanism to maintain state between HTTP requests is the HTTP
>> session. You might be able to hack something together (in a non-portable
>> way) on a per connection basis but that is likely to require so
Am 2012-10-27 16:57, schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 27/10/2012 14:50, Michael-O wrote:
Hi,
several authentication mechanisms require a session (*not* HTTP session)
or connection being initiated when authentication is performed and
principal cached for subsquent requests [1], [2].
Now, I want to patch
On 27/10/2012 14:50, Michael-O wrote:
> Hi,
>
> several authentication mechanisms require a session (*not* HTTP session)
> or connection being initiated when authentication is performed and
> principal cached for subsquent requests [1], [2].
>
> Now, I want to patch our SPNEGO authenticator in To
13 matches
Mail list logo
