-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 7/20/2010 11:14 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: Self-Contained Web Applications
Well, having to include commons-dbcp is a bit of an implementation
detail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
(I mist have missed these replies... I'm resurrecting this thread).
On 6/25/2010 5:44 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Jon Brisbin [mailto:jon.bris...@npcinternational.com]
Subject: Re: Self-Contained Web Applications
Wouldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 6/25/2010 6:01 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
Subject: Re: Self-Contained Web Applications
We can define a DataSource inside a Context already, hook up a locally
configured Realm, and it'll use
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: Self-Contained Web Applications
Well, having to include commons-dbcp is a bit of an implementation
detail, here. I should be able to include only my own JDBC driver and
have Tomcat figure out that commons-dbcp
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: Self-Contained Web Applications
1. Just but mysql-connector-j.x.y.z.jar into WEB-INF/lib
But still use container-provided connection pooling when the container classes
are loaded by the common classloader
On 25/06/2010 17:02, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
While reading another thread (What's going on ... ?), I started to
think about how inconvenient it is to have to put your JDBC driver into
the server's lib directory. As it stands, now, all webapps must share
the same version of the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 6/25/2010 12:44 PM, Pid wrote:
On 25/06/2010 17:02, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
While reading another thread (What's going on ... ?), I started to
think about how inconvenient it is to have to put your JDBC driver into
the server's
On 25/06/2010 19:06, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Pid,
On 6/25/2010 12:44 PM, Pid wrote:
On 25/06/2010 17:02, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
While reading another thread (What's going on ... ?), I started to
think about how inconvenient it is to have to put your JDBC driver into
the
On Jun 25, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Pid wrote:
Which part of the container hierarchy would the DataSource be attached to?
Wouldn't it make sense to scope it to the Context, since you'd be using the
webapp's classloader?
Jon Brisbin
Portal Webmaster
NPC International, Inc.
From: Jon Brisbin [mailto:jon.bris...@npcinternational.com]
Subject: Re: Self-Contained Web Applications
Wouldn't it make sense to scope it to the Context, since
you'd be using the webapp's classloader?
Correct. Note that the desired effect should be achievable by including
commons-dbcp
On 25/06/2010 22:29, Jon Brisbin wrote:
On Jun 25, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Pid wrote:
Which part of the container hierarchy would the DataSource be attached to?
Wouldn't it make sense to scope it to the Context, since you'd be using the
webapp's classloader?
We can define a DataSource inside
From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
Subject: Re: Self-Contained Web Applications
We can define a DataSource inside a Context already, hook up a locally
configured Realm, and it'll use a driver from the web app ClassLoader,
which makes the app completely self contained.
I don't understand
12 matches
Mail list logo
