On 1/21/16 4:13 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rallavagu,
On 1/19/16 6:14 PM, Rallavagu wrote:
On 1/19/16 2:43 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/01/2016 22:36, Rallavagu wrote:
Also, it could be keep-alive for client connection as well. In any case,
how long a keep-alive connection will be in
Rallavagu,
On 1/19/16 6:14 PM, Rallavagu wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/16 2:43 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 19/01/2016 22:36, Rallavagu wrote:
>>> Also, it could be keep-alive for client connection as well. In any case,
>>> how long a keep-alive connection will be in this state by default?
>>> Thanks.
On 19/01/2016 22:36, Rallavagu wrote:
> Also, it could be keep-alive for client connection as well. In any case,
> how long a keep-alive connection will be in this state by default? Thanks.
This behaviour is entirely normal. Why are you concerned about it?
Regarding how long the thread will be
Also, it could be keep-alive for client connection as well. In any case,
how long a keep-alive connection will be in this state by default? Thanks.
On 1/19/16 2:24 PM, Rallavagu wrote:
Thanks Mark. It seems to be running for almost 10 seconds and there is a
Load Balancer between. Is it a
On 19/01/2016 21:42, Rallavagu wrote:
> I have this long running thread. It appears to be reading but the stack
> trace does not give much of a clue. Could anyone help with where to
> start? Thanks.
Looks like an HTTP keep-alive connection waiting for the next request.
Mark
>
> Tomcat 7.0.42
Thanks Mark. It seems to be running for almost 10 seconds and there is a
Load Balancer between. Is it a suspect?
On 1/19/16 2:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/01/2016 21:42, Rallavagu wrote:
I have this long running thread. It appears to be reading but the stack
trace does not give much of a
On 1/19/16 2:43 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/01/2016 22:36, Rallavagu wrote:
Also, it could be keep-alive for client connection as well. In any case,
how long a keep-alive connection will be in this state by default? Thanks.
This behaviour is entirely normal. Why are you concerned about it?
