sers@tomcat.apache.org> Subject: Re: Tomcat
> 8/NIO performance discrepancies
>
> On 12/06/17 20:27, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote:
>> Thanks, Mark. I have been testing with 100 concurrent users.
>> While the executor had the maxThreads set to 150, the connector
>> wit
ers@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
On 12/06/17 20:27, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote:
> Thanks, Mark.
> I have been testing with 100 concurrent users. While the executor had the
> maxThreads set to 150, the connector without the executor was left to the
ers@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
On 08/06/17 14:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'll look at BIO vs NIO next.
At the sort of request rates and response sizes we are talking about, we are a
long way from real-world applications and the differences you see be
sage-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 7:13 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
>
> On 07/06/17 22:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
>> I'm
: Thursday, June 08, 2017 7:13 PM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
On 07/06/17 22:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'm still seeing significant differences in BIO with and without an
> executor.
>
> I'm still looking for
Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.
Message d'origine
De: kmaxwilliam...@gmail.com
Envoyé: vendredi 9 juin 2017 00:12
À: Astrat Goe; Tomcat Users List
Objet: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
Gvhuf
Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.
Message d'origine
De: Astrat Goe
Gvhuf
Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.
Message d'origine
De: Astrat Goe
Envoyé: mercredi 7 juin 2017 21:29
À: Tomcat Users List
Répondre à: Tomcat Users List
Objet: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 4:28 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org&
On 08/06/17 14:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'll look at BIO vs NIO next.
At the sort of request rates and response sizes we are talking about, we
are a long way from real-world applications and the differences you see
between BIO and NIO are largely down to the differences between doing a
blocking
On 07/06/17 22:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'm still seeing significant differences in BIO with and without an
> executor.
>
> I'm still looking for the root cause. I have noticed that without an
> executor I see far fewer keep-alive requests than I'd expect. That could
> explain the difference,
HTTP sampler that I configured
>> with JMeter, and it is not set in my jmeter.properties file. So, going by
>> JMeter's documentation, Apache HttpComponents HttpClient 4.x. should be in
>> use.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Piyush.
>>
>> -----Original Me
HTTP sampler that I configured
>> with JMeter, and it is not set in my jmeter.properties file. So, going by
>> JMeter's documentation, Apache HttpComponents HttpClient 4.x. should be in
>> use.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Piyush.
>>
>> -----Original Me
HTTP sampler that I configured
>> with JMeter, and it is not set in my jmeter.properties file. So, going by
>> JMeter's documentation, Apache HttpComponents HttpClient 4.x. should be in
>> use.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Piyush.
>>
>> -----Original Me
--Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 8:27 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
>
> On 06/06/17 09:10, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote:
>>
be in use.
Thanks
Piyush.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 8:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
On 06/06/17 09:10, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote:
> Tha
On 7 June 2017 17:33:02 BST, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>Mark,
>
>On 6/7/17 10:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I do see odd behaviour with BIO + executor. It locks up very
>> easily. It appears that the client isn't closing the connections. I
>> don't see this problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/7/17 10:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I do see odd behaviour with BIO + executor. It locks up very
> easily. It appears that the client isn't closing the connections. I
> don't see this problem with BIO but that may be related to how BIO
>
On 06/06/17 09:10, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote:
> Thanks, Mark.
>
> Here are some additional details.
Thanks. These help a lot to make sure we are testing (at least roughly)
the same thing.
> I am using Apache JMeter to inject load. I am using a simple hello-world JSP.
>
> The test JMX simulates
, 2017 7:59 PM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
Violeta,
The data you see in an average of 3 samples of 180 second duration each.
Missed out on mentioning it before, but the thoughput is in no. of requests per
second, a
...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 7:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
Hi,
2017-06-06 11:10 GMT+03:00 Piyush Kumar Nayak
<pna...@adobe.com.invalid<mailto:pna...@adobe.com.invalid>>:
>
> Thanks, M
> Throughput
>
> ART
>
> Tomcat 7.077
>
> 38600
>
> 2
>
> 42664
>
> 2
>
> 57104
>
> 1
>
> 43660
>
> 2
>
> Tomcat 8.0.44
>
> 38585
>
> 2
>
> 44752
>
> 2
>
> 63000
>
> 1
>
> 44341
>
> 2
.5.14
N/A
45600
1.67
N/A
46000
1.67
Regards,
Piyush.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 8/NIO performance discrepancies
On 06/06/17 07:30
On 06/06/17 07:30, Piyush Kumar Nayak wrote:
> We have been testing different connectors of tomcat for performance.
> We have tested the following server versions:
>
> - Tomcat 7.077
>
> - Tomcat 8.0.44
>
> - Tomcat 8.0.32
>
> - Tomcat 8.5.14
>
> with the
22 matches
Mail list logo