-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 5:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
I'd love to see the code that enforces this.
Search for applicationDispatcher.specViolation.request and
Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote in message
news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
and of which I only generally know what it does.
Now it seems that with a new version of this servlet,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net wrote:
Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote in message
news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
the proxy API which is [just] about the coolest thing available in
Java IMO.
If it does a forward or include done the line,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
the proxy API which is [just] about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
won't work with any remotely recent version of Tomcat. These
versions enforce the spec requirement that the Request has to be a
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
won't work with any remotely recent
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider kschnei...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
won't work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris,
On 4/22/2010 4:48 PM, Kris Schneider wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
The following filter works as expected on Tomcat 6.0.26 (some changes
were required to make it actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider kschnei...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 4/22/2010
2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider kschnei...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
and of which I only generally know what it does.
Now it seems that with a new version of this servlet,
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is there something that just lists the standard
calls/methods used
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is there something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:24 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is
On 21/04/2010 20:46, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD
Mark, Chris and Kris, thanks.
You have all impressed the hell out of me.
You have also lost me.. at a guess about 50 lines ago.
But I get the idea, and it is nice to learn that such things exist.
I also believe this may be helpful to someone else some day looking for
a solution to a case much
21 matches
Mail list logo
