Re: JPA 2.0 compliant OpenJPA version in 2.1 based TomEE?

[Maxim Solodovnik]

Thanks for the pointer!
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:25 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
 wrote:
>
> Not related but yes, same as today (means some "portable" syntax of spring
> needs to import these classes back
> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/commit/69ec437fbc07f72265aa315c3222e18f73409651#diff-7dc6e6ab14a91414c635ccfe889842eaL48
> )
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 18:21, Maxim Solodovnik  a
> écrit :
>
> > Not sure if my question is related to this thread,
> > Is OpenJPA 3.0 will be supported by Spring5?
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:25 PM Mark Struberg 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Fabian!
> > >
> > > The main reason to not include OpenJPA-3.0.0 in TomEE-7.0.5 is because
> > OpenJPA-3.0.0 requires Java8 as minimum level.
> > > But TomEE-7.0.5 still supports to run on Java7.
> > >
> > > That said, it's pretty straight forward to just replace the OpenJPA jars
> > on TomEE-7.0.5 with the ones from OpenJPA-3.0.0.
> > > All the API jars should already have been upgraded in TomEE.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > > > Am 07.08.2018 um 13:51 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Fabian,
> > > >
> > > > no real reason I guess, feel free to open a PR
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > > >  | Old Blog
> > > >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn  | Book
> > > > <
> > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 13:22, gilbertoca  a
> > écrit :
> > > >
> > > >> Hello, Fabian!
> > > >>
> > > >> Based on this answer[1] by Romain I think they are targeting the 2.2
> > spec
> > > >> and waiting for the release of the Jakarta EE TCKs[2].
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> Gilberto
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-TomEE-7-0-5-and-JPA-2-1-td4684185.html
> > > >> [2] https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-jakarta-ee-tck
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> fabian-a.richter wrote
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> the OpenJPA team released its JPA 2.1 release at the same time as the
> > > >>> update for 2.0 (2.4.3)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As TomEE 7 is Java EE 7 based (which includes JPA 2.1 if I am not
> > > >>> mistaken) why didn’t the 7.0.5 release finally incude the (correct)
> > JPA
> > > >>> 2.1 compliant relase of OpenJPA?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You guys do maintain the OpenEJB packages as well, don’t you?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What was the reason for still packaging a JPA 2.0 implementation
> > into a
> > > >>> JPA 2.1 application server?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks and best,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Fabian
> > > >>> smime.p7s (7K)
> > > >>> 
> > > >>
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4684429/0/smime.p7s
> > > >> ;
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Sent from:
> > > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: JPA 2.0 compliant OpenJPA version in 2.1 based TomEE?

[Maxim Solodovnik]

Not sure if my question is related to this thread,
Is OpenJPA 3.0 will be supported by Spring5?
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 7:25 PM Mark Struberg  wrote:
>
> Hi Fabian!
>
> The main reason to not include OpenJPA-3.0.0 in TomEE-7.0.5 is because 
> OpenJPA-3.0.0 requires Java8 as minimum level.
> But TomEE-7.0.5 still supports to run on Java7.
>
> That said, it's pretty straight forward to just replace the OpenJPA jars on 
> TomEE-7.0.5 with the ones from OpenJPA-3.0.0.
> All the API jars should already have been upgraded in TomEE.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 07.08.2018 um 13:51 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> >
> > Hi Fabian,
> >
> > no real reason I guess, feel free to open a PR
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github 
> >  |
> > LinkedIn  | Book
> > 
> >
> >
> > Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 13:22, gilbertoca  a écrit :
> >
> >> Hello, Fabian!
> >>
> >> Based on this answer[1] by Romain I think they are targeting the 2.2 spec
> >> and waiting for the release of the Jakarta EE TCKs[2].
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Gilberto
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-TomEE-7-0-5-and-JPA-2-1-td4684185.html
> >> [2] https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-jakarta-ee-tck
> >>
> >>
> >> fabian-a.richter wrote
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> the OpenJPA team released its JPA 2.1 release at the same time as the
> >>> update for 2.0 (2.4.3)
> >>>
> >>> As TomEE 7 is Java EE 7 based (which includes JPA 2.1 if I am not
> >>> mistaken) why didn’t the 7.0.5 release finally incude the (correct) JPA
> >>> 2.1 compliant relase of OpenJPA?
> >>>
> >>> You guys do maintain the OpenEJB packages as well, don’t you?
> >>>
> >>> What was the reason for still packaging a JPA 2.0 implementation into a
> >>> JPA 2.1 application server?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and best,
> >>>
> >>> Fabian
> >>> smime.p7s (7K)
> >>> 
> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4684429/0/smime.p7s
> >> ;
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from:
> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html
> >>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Re: JPA 2.0 compliant OpenJPA version in 2.1 based TomEE?

[Mark Struberg]

Hi Fabian!

The main reason to not include OpenJPA-3.0.0 in TomEE-7.0.5 is because 
OpenJPA-3.0.0 requires Java8 as minimum level.
But TomEE-7.0.5 still supports to run on Java7.

That said, it's pretty straight forward to just replace the OpenJPA jars on 
TomEE-7.0.5 with the ones from OpenJPA-3.0.0.
All the API jars should already have been upgraded in TomEE.

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 07.08.2018 um 13:51 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Hi Fabian,
> 
> no real reason I guess, feel free to open a PR
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github  |
> LinkedIn  | Book
> 
> 
> 
> Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 13:22, gilbertoca  a écrit :
> 
>> Hello, Fabian!
>> 
>> Based on this answer[1] by Romain I think they are targeting the 2.2 spec
>> and waiting for the release of the Jakarta EE TCKs[2].
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Gilberto
>> 
>> [1]
>> 
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-TomEE-7-0-5-and-JPA-2-1-td4684185.html
>> [2] https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-jakarta-ee-tck
>> 
>> 
>> fabian-a.richter wrote
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> the OpenJPA team released its JPA 2.1 release at the same time as the
>>> update for 2.0 (2.4.3)
>>> 
>>> As TomEE 7 is Java EE 7 based (which includes JPA 2.1 if I am not
>>> mistaken) why didn’t the 7.0.5 release finally incude the (correct) JPA
>>> 2.1 compliant relase of OpenJPA?
>>> 
>>> You guys do maintain the OpenEJB packages as well, don’t you?
>>> 
>>> What was the reason for still packaging a JPA 2.0 implementation into a
>>> JPA 2.1 application server?
>>> 
>>> Thanks and best,
>>> 
>>> Fabian
>>> smime.p7s (7K)
>>> 
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4684429/0/smime.p7s
>> ;
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html
>> 

Re: JPA 2.0 compliant OpenJPA version in 2.1 based TomEE?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi Fabian,

no real reason I guess, feel free to open a PR

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 13:22, gilbertoca  a écrit :

> Hello, Fabian!
>
> Based on this answer[1] by Romain I think they are targeting the 2.2 spec
> and waiting for the release of the Jakarta EE TCKs[2].
>
> Regards,
>
> Gilberto
>
> [1]
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-TomEE-7-0-5-and-JPA-2-1-td4684185.html
> [2] https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-jakarta-ee-tck
>
>
> fabian-a.richter wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > the OpenJPA team released its JPA 2.1 release at the same time as the
> > update for 2.0 (2.4.3)
> >
> > As TomEE 7 is Java EE 7 based (which includes JPA 2.1 if I am not
> > mistaken) why didn’t the 7.0.5 release finally incude the (correct) JPA
> > 2.1 compliant relase of OpenJPA?
> >
> > You guys do maintain the OpenEJB packages as well, don’t you?
> >
> > What was the reason for still packaging a JPA 2.0 implementation into a
> > JPA 2.1 application server?
> >
> > Thanks and best,
> >
> > Fabian
> > smime.p7s (7K)
> > 
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4684429/0/smime.p7s
> ;
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html
>

Re: JPA 2.0 compliant OpenJPA version in 2.1 based TomEE?

[gilbertoca]

Hello, Fabian!

Based on this answer[1] by Romain I think they are targeting the 2.2 spec
and waiting for the release of the Jakarta EE TCKs[2].

Regards,

Gilberto

[1]
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Apache-TomEE-7-0-5-and-JPA-2-1-td4684185.html
[2] https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-jakarta-ee-tck


fabian-a.richter wrote
> Hi,
> 
> the OpenJPA team released its JPA 2.1 release at the same time as the
> update for 2.0 (2.4.3) 
> 
> As TomEE 7 is Java EE 7 based (which includes JPA 2.1 if I am not
> mistaken) why didn’t the 7.0.5 release finally incude the (correct) JPA
> 2.1 compliant relase of OpenJPA?
> 
> You guys do maintain the OpenEJB packages as well, don’t you?
> 
> What was the reason for still packaging a JPA 2.0 implementation into a
> JPA 2.1 application server?
> 
> Thanks and best,
> 
> Fabian
> smime.p7s (7K)
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/attachment/4684429/0/smime.p7s;





--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html

JPA 2.0 compliant OpenJPA version in 2.1 based TomEE?

[fabian-a . richter]

Hi,

 

the OpenJPA team released its JPA 2.1 release at the same time as the update 
for 2.0 (2.4.3) 

 

As TomEE 7 is Java EE 7 based (which includes JPA 2.1 if I am not mistaken) why 
didn’t the 7.0.5 release finally incude the (correct) JPA 2.1 compliant relase 
of OpenJPA?

 

You guys do maintain the OpenEJB packages as well, don’t you?

 

What was the reason for still packaging a JPA 2.0 implementation into a JPA 2.1 
application server?

 

Thanks and best,

Fabian

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature