I imagine it can :)
cheers
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I wondering what's the best approach to overriding the markup for a
panel. Is there a method I can override or should I just extend the
Panel?
You should extend it. You *could* use a custom resolution (see the
custom markup example in
Finish!
It's my fault, i named the project aswicketdb4o, so problem occurred.
thank you igor!
regards,
rosen jiang
rosen jiang wrote:
hi all,
I am studying guestbook sample of 1.3 right now, but encounter some
problem:
If i submit the form, then rising Page Expired.
I have read
Yeah, it's a tough problem to solve. Any concrete help (meaning
executable code) is welcome.
I think my boss is quite into sharing code so will see if we come up with
anything good.
Wicket is not the answer to everything either. No-one on the team is
dogmatic on this. I think Wicket is
Hello!
There's a new version of a plugin:
http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_Bench
This is mostly a maintenance release: Eclipse 3.3 support and Wicket
dependency is updated to be 1.3. The only new feature adds keybindings
to quickly create associated html or properties file
Anyway, all I can say is I really like Wicket and I'm sorry if I offended
anybody.
I don't think you did. We've got thick skin most of the time :-)
I love a frank tech debate
We too. No worries.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe,
Thanks for keep working on this!
Eelco
On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 PM, Joni Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
There's a new version of a plugin:
http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_Bench
This is mostly a maintenance release: Eclipse 3.3 support and Wicket
dependency is
A release candidate has been made available on sourceforge and the
wicketstuff maven repository.
We did however made a little jump in the version number, the current
release is version 1.3.0-rc1.
There have been several questions / request about the version number
and by following the wicket
Hi,
i just wanted to have a look at it but im somehow stuck.
First I wanted to get it from src so I checked out the
wicketwebbeans-examples from trunk and did:
mvn install
error:
GroupId: net.sourceforge.wicketwebbeans.parent
ArtifactId: WicketWebBeans-parent
Version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
Reason:
excellent work! I've been anxiously waiting for this release. It's
been tough to live without this plugin since I've been working with
1.3 for so long.
On Jan 6, 2008 10:20 AM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for keep working on this!
Eelco
On Jan 6, 2008 7:57 PM, Joni
thanks! looks sweet. does it work with eclipse 3.4m4?
Joni Freeman wrote:
Hello!
There's a new version of a plugin:
http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_Bench
This is mostly a maintenance release: Eclipse 3.3 support and Wicket
dependency is updated to be 1.3.
Hi,
I'm still on 3.3 series and haven't tried 3.4m4. The plugin uses some
internal eclipse APIs (like refactoring support) and those features may
break between Eclipse releases.
Joni
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 10:24 -0800, Jonathan Locke wrote:
thanks! looks sweet. does it work with eclipse
Hi,
I have a WebPage which defines a private variable, and then a Model that wraps the variable. I then pass this variable around to other
webpages in their constructor. In one particular page where I open a ModalWindow and manipulate data in the modelobject, it seems that a
copy is beeing
That might be related to SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, what exact
wicket version are you using?
-Matej
On Jan 6, 2008 8:42 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a WebPage which defines a private variable, and then a Model that
wraps the variable. I then pass this variable
That might be related to SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, what exact
wicket version are you using?
I'm using 1.3 final. If you can point me to a prior version that wouldn't have
this problem, I could update my pom and check?
-- Edvin
Did some more digging - rc1 and rc2 have the same problem, but it seems to go away with beta3. Were there any significant changes to the
SecondLevelCacheSessionStore between beta3 and rc1?
-- Edvin
Edvin Syse skrev:
That might be related to SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, what exact
wicket
Not that I know about. Could you please create a JIRA entry and attach
a testcase?
-Matej
On Jan 6, 2008 9:07 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did some more digging - rc1 and rc2 have the same problem, but it seems to go
away with beta3. Were there any significant changes to the
we switched from the httpstore to file/diskstore iirc.
On Jan 6, 2008 9:24 PM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I know about. Could you please create a JIRA entry and attach
a testcase?
-Matej
On Jan 6, 2008 9:07 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did some more digging
we switched from the httpstore to file/diskstore iirc.
Aha! I reverted my pom to 1.3 final and switched to the HttpSessionStore, and
the problem went away.
I'll take a quick peek at the sourcecode for the SecondLevelCacheSessionStore before I create a testcase, since the testcase would
On Jan 6, 2008 9:53 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we switched from the httpstore to file/diskstore iirc.
Actually, we switched to FilePageStore to DiskPageStore.
HttpSessionStore isn't the default in any 1.3 release.
Aha! I reverted my pom to 1.3 final and switched to the
I'll take a quick peek at the sourcecode for the
SecondLevelCacheSessionStore before I create a testcase, since the
testcase would include quite a bit of code..
Checked it out, and I think the problem is with the versionhandling in SecondLevelCachePageVersionManager, but I'm not smart enough
The thing is, switching to HttpSessionStore is a temporary solution at
best. There are known issues with HttpSessionStore and backbutton
which SecondLevelCacheSessionStore solves.
-Matej
On Jan 6, 2008 9:59 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take a quick peek at the sourcecode for
The thing is, switching to HttpSessionStore is a temporary solution at
best. There are known issues with HttpSessionStore and backbutton
which SecondLevelCacheSessionStore solves.
Arghfl :/ Are there any other viable alternatives I can use in the meantime so
I can deploy now? :)
-- Edvin
You might try switching diskpagestore to filepagestore, e.g.
return new SecondLevelCacheSessionStore(new FilePageStore());
and see if that helps.
-Matej
On Jan 6, 2008 10:04 PM, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is, switching to HttpSessionStore is a temporary solution at
best.
You might try switching diskpagestore to filepagestore, e.g.
return new SecondLevelCacheSessionStore(new FilePageStore());
and see if that helps.
-Matej
I can't find a FilePageStore, is it SimpleSynchronousFilePageStore?
-- Edvin
That's too bad, looks like the store has been removed already. I
wasn't aware of that.
You can try SimpleSynchronousFilePageStore, but only to see if that
helps your problem.
and also you might want to try running DiskPageStore in synchronous mode,
new DiskPageStore() {
protected boolean
You might try switching diskpagestore to filepagestore, e.g.
return new SecondLevelCacheSessionStore(new FilePageStore());
and see if that helps.
-Matej
I tried:
return new SecondLevelCacheSessionStore(this, new
SimpleSynchronousFilePageStore());
That reintroduces the bug, so it seems the
Matej Knopp skrev:
That's too bad, looks like the store has been removed already. I
wasn't aware of that.
You can try SimpleSynchronousFilePageStore, but only to see if that
helps your problem.
and also you might want to try running DiskPageStore in synchronous mode,
new DiskPageStore() {
I am pleased to announce that our next monthly London Wicket Users Group
event (February 6) will be generously hosted by Google (close to Victoria
Station). Special thanks go to http://herebebeasties.com/ Al Maw for
arranging this - he even mentioned something about sandwiches (tbc).
Full
I'm trying to create a testcase and have a question:
Is it likely that the complexity of the object has anything to do with wether the bug appears or not? The object in the real app has a
list of objects as one of the properties..
-- Edvin
Edvin Syse skrev:
Matej Knopp skrev:
That's too
This is not going to work yes.
I also mentioned this in the presentation i gave in amsterdam at the
wicket meeting. You cant have shared variables between pages and
expect those to be always shared and the same instance. This will not
work with the SLC because we serrialize the pages per page. So
This is not going to work yes.
I also mentioned this in the presentation i gave in amsterdam at the
wicket meeting. You cant have shared variables between pages and
expect those to be always shared and the same instance. This will not
work with the SLC because we serrialize the pages per page. So
Yes that will work also (using the session for that)
Pagemaps are simple to use jmust create a page with the PageMap arg
constructor. Then that page is created and stored in that pagmap and
wont push the opener page out of the default pagmap. See
PageMap.forNam()
On 1/6/08, Edvin Syse [EMAIL
You need to check out the entire trunk, not just wicketwebbeans-examples.
The examples rely on the parent maven project.
When using the .war file, the URL you need to use is:
127.0.0.1:8080/wicketwebbeans-examples/WebBeans
See http://wicketwebbeans.sourceforge.net/wiki-html/RunningSamples.html
Erm. Wrong.
This should work. All that ugly serialization magic we have is there
so this works. So that you always have and update the latest page
version no matter what you do. Unforunately there seem to be a
regression. I'm working on it right now.
-Matej
On Jan 6, 2008 10:42 PM, Johan
Dears all,
I have use the tabbed panel for a menu and a sub menu fine. I
have a new need for the sub tabbedPanel menu. This subpanel is a sidebar and
it is rendering in the nested wicket div, but I need to be rendered in
another tag, the content div tag, which is not nested in the
you can subclass tabbedpanel and override the default markup it uses
by providing your own .html file. the only thing to watch out is that
the nesting of wicket:ids matches between the two html files.
-igor
On Jan 6, 2008 2:54 PM, Fernando Wermus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dears all,
Wow. Page.readResolve is not called, at least not on JDK6. When I
modify the access modifier to public instead of private, suddenly it's
called. But the serialization specification says it can have any
access modifier.
I've commited the fix to current trunk, any chance you can build
wicket from
Wow. Page.readResolve is not called, at least not on JDK6. When I
modify the access modifier to public instead of private, suddenly it's
called. But the serialization specification says it can have any
access modifier.
I've commited the fix to current trunk, any chance you can build
wicket from
Wow. Page.readResolve is not called, at least not on JDK6. When I
modify the access modifier to public instead of private, suddenly it's
called. But the serialization specification says it can have any
access modifier.
I've commited the fix to current trunk, any chance you can build
wicket from
That's too bad, as it works as it's supposed for me now. I would
really need to see some code.
Do you pass object reference from pageA to pageB, or the entire pageA?
because if you have situation like this:
pageA holds reference to objectX
pageA passes reference to objectX to pageB
pageB
Wicket detects inter-page references and makes sure that when page b
gets serialized, it also serializes page a instance. Anyway, just
having the reference might not be enough. Safest approach is to use
pageA reference to get the data.
e.g. instead of passing the data to pageb, pass pagea and
On Jan 7, 2008 1:57 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it serializes the page and the object in one file... so the references
keep connected.
Martijn
Actually, not quite.
When pageB has reference to pageA and pageB is being serialized, it serializes
pageB and pageA separately. So
Wicket detects inter-page references and makes sure that when page b
gets serialized, it also serializes page a instance. Anyway, just
having the reference might not be enough. Safest approach is to use
pageA reference to get the data.
Hehe.. Just hit that one as well. I created an interface
Hi all!
I have a question about how to create a consistent layout with wicket.
now I have a index class and all other classes extends it.
code
public class Index extends WebPage {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
protected String getName(){
return Title here;
I just got an email like yesterday.
Ch 9 and 10.
-rob
David Leangen wrote:
Hi!
Anybody know what's going on with WIA?
I haven't received a notification from MEAP in a long time.
Any new updates planned soon?
I agree on what you guys say, but theres also the chance legolas dont
know every tip of the framework. And just wanted to know about panels or
markup inheritance...
People doesnt always know how to ask a question if they arent familiar
with the framework. An so sometimes questions just come
Ok, thanks!
Guess something's wrong with my registration, then.
Cheers,
David
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 22:53 -0500, Robby O'Connor wrote:
I just got an email like yesterday.
Ch 9 and 10.
-rob
David Leangen wrote:
Hi!
Anybody know what's going on with WIA?
I haven't received a
47 matches
Mail list logo
