Hi,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Patrick Davids <
patrick.dav...@nubologic.com> wrote:
> Hi Sven, Hi Paul,
> thanx, now its working.
>
> I thought the PropertyModel/PropertyResolver will unpack the
> model-object itself, so there is no need to adress getObject by ".object".
> Maybe a small no
Hi,
I also think this is good feature.
In Wicket 7 StringResourceModel already uses IModel for the default value,
so it is possible to do it.
I'll improve ResourceModel too.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Guillaume S
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5754
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also think this is good feature.
> In Wicket 7 StringResourceModel already uses IModel for the def
I would recommend against using .object inside a PropertyModel, at least
if your application makes use of detachable models. When a component uses
the property model in your example,
new PropertyModel(MyPage.this, "list.object[1].anyProperty")
The model returned by MyPage.getList() will be
The Apache Wicket PMC is proud to announce Apache Wicket 6.18.0!
This release marks another minor release of Wicket 6. Starting
with Wicket 6 we use semantic versioning for the future development
of Wicket, and as such no API breaks are present in this release
compared to 6.0.0.
New and noteworth
The Apache Wicket PMC is proud to announce Apache Wicket 7.0.0-M4!
We have released another milestone release for Apache Wicket 7. We aim
to finalise Wicket 7 over the coming months and request your help in
testing the new major version.
Caveats
---
It is still a development version so expec
Greetings,
Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
wicket version.
However maven repository search does not show jar files for version
6.18.0 or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-web
I also found it confusing, I use wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 with wicket
6.18 and jetty 9.0.+
I was not able to get running on jetty 9.2 yet.
Adam
On Nov 10, 2014 5:04 PM, "Niranjan Rao" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
> shows m
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Niranjan Rao wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
> shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
> wicket version.
>
> However maven repository search does not show jar files
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Adam Hammer wrote:
> I also found it confusing, I use wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 with wicket
> 6.18 and jetty 9.0.+
I'll update the guide.
>
> I was not able to get running on jetty 9.2 yet.
>
Jetty 9.2+ is JSR356 complaint so you should use
wicket-n
10 matches
Mail list logo
