Re: [SOLVED] Re: PropertyModel / PropertyResolver / Map or List access

2014-11-10 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Patrick Davids patrick.dav...@nubologic.com wrote: Hi Sven, Hi Paul, thanx, now its working. I thought the PropertyModel/PropertyResolver will unpack the model-object itself, so there is no need to adress getObject by .object. Maybe a small note in

Re: ResourceModel with default *key*

2014-11-10 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, I also think this is good feature. In Wicket 7 StringResourceModel already uses IModel for the default value, so it is possible to do it. I'll improve ResourceModel too. Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Guillaume

Re: ResourceModel with default *key*

2014-11-10 Thread Martin Grigorov
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5754 Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I also think this is good feature. In Wicket 7 StringResourceModel already uses

Re: [SOLVED] Re: PropertyModel / PropertyResolver / Map or List access

2014-11-10 Thread Boris Goldowsky
I would recommend against using .object inside a PropertyModel, at least if your application makes use of detachable models. When a component uses the property model in your example, new PropertyModel(MyPage.this, list.object[1].anyProperty) The model returned by MyPage.getList() will be

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Wicket 6.18.0 Released

2014-11-10 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The Apache Wicket PMC is proud to announce Apache Wicket 6.18.0! This release marks another minor release of Wicket 6. Starting with Wicket 6 we use semantic versioning for the future development of Wicket, and as such no API breaks are present in this release compared to 6.0.0. New and

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Wicket 7.0.0-M4 Released

2014-11-10 Thread Martijn Dashorst
The Apache Wicket PMC is proud to announce Apache Wicket 7.0.0-M4! We have released another milestone release for Apache Wicket 7. We aim to finalise Wicket 7 over the coming months and request your help in testing the new major version. Caveats --- It is still a development version so

Web sockets - version confusion

2014-11-10 Thread Niranjan Rao
Greetings, Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is wicket version. However maven repository search does not show jar files for version 6.18.0 or any versions in 6.* series.

Re: Web sockets - version confusion

2014-11-10 Thread Adam Hammer
I also found it confusing, I use wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 with wicket 6.18 and jetty 9.0.+ I was not able to get running on jetty 9.2 yet. Adam On Nov 10, 2014 5:04 PM, Niranjan Rao nhr...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, Document at

Re: Web sockets - version confusion

2014-11-10 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Niranjan Rao nhr...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is wicket version. However maven repository search does not show

Re: Web sockets - version confusion

2014-11-10 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Adam Hammer adamhamm...@gmail.com wrote: I also found it confusing, I use wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 with wicket 6.18 and jetty 9.0.+ I'll update the guide. I was not able to get running on jetty 9.2 yet. Jetty 9.2+ is JSR356 complaint so you