Hi,
AppEngine uses Jetty and I remembered about
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5390.
Here the reporter explains that Jetty won't update its SessionStore if it
believes the http session didn't change.
Wicket stores both o.a.w.Session and all pages rendered in the last request
as attri
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Don Ferguson wrote:
> Good people of Wicket land: it’s been 3 months since 7.0.0-M5 came out. Is
> an M6 or a release candidate going to be coming our way any time soon?
Rest assured! We are working on it. We uncovered some nastiness with
stack overflow errors,
You're right!!! I didn't even look at that - I only looked to see if the
log messages were there.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> The url seems to work now!
> Clicking deactivate sets the property to null.
> Please confirm that it works as expected.
>
> Martin Grigoro
Wow, that makes sense - and I _think_ it explains the symptoms I've seen
with other problems as well. I'll have to re-investigate those.
The issue you mentioned is marked as resolved in 6.12 and the related
issue (WICKET-5473) was fixed in 6.14. We are running 6.19. So I must be
reading those des
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Christopher Merrill <
ch...@webperformance.com> wrote:
> Wow, that makes sense - and I _think_ it explains the symptoms I've seen
> with other problems as well. I'll have to re-investigate those.
>
> The issue you mentioned is marked as resolved in 6.12 and the re
Adding an IRequestCycleListener that put a new value into the session at
the end of each request DOES fix the problem. As you noted, it fixed my
stripped-down example. I have tested all of the symptoms I have mentioned
in previous related posts and they are ALL fixed :>
Overriding our session clas
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Christopher Merrill <
ch...@webperformance.com> wrote:
> Adding an IRequestCycleListener that put a new value into the session at
> the end of each request DOES fix the problem. As you noted, it fixed my
> stripped-down example. I have tested all of the symptoms I
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> I am puzzled why people use AppEngine in first place. It has so many
> restrictions. It looks like a pain to me to develop for this platform.
>
It does have a lot of restrictions, but if you can live with / adapt to
those, GAE has a lot
Please create a pull request at gae-initializer project .
On May 15, 2015 6:00 PM, "Christopher Merrill"
wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>
> > I am puzzled why people use AppEngine in first place. It has so many
> > restrictions. It looks like a pain to me to
