Hi,
I would like to use multiple updating behaviors attached to the same
component (In my case a DropDownChoice). It works for one component, but
when I add 2 only one gets updated.
Is it possible to do so? I tried initially on wicket-1.2.6, it didn't
work, then made the effort to the port to
AM, Bernard Niset [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use multiple updating behaviors attached to the same
component (In my case a DropDownChoice). It works for one component, but
when I add 2 only one gets updated.
Is it possible to do so? I tried initially on wicket-1.2.6
Hi Lukasz,
I use about the same configuration as yours. I think you can safely
replace the provided version of log4j (in the lib directory) with a more
recent one. I have a production environment working with log4j 1.2.8,
other test environments I use have more recent versions. My production
Hi Martin,
There *is* a way to evaluate the type parameter at runtime. Something
like the following will give you the first type used:
(ClassT) ((ParameterizedType) getClass()
.getGenericSuperclass()).getActualTypeArguments()[0]
Regards,
Bernard.
Martin Voigt a écrit :
if we
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Cordialement,
Bernard Niset.
SmartObjects SPRL
Avenue Hergé, 21/14
1050 - Bruxelles
BELGIQUE
+1
Regards,
Bernard
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
folks are anxious for generified
Hi all,
[X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a component to only accept certain models
for instance) than static type checking.
[X] I might rethink upgrading if my
AND there is flexibility while extending(wicket is one
case which is flexible when you extend)--then wait, do not generify. *
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Bernard Niset [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
[X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components
Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Bernard Niset [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martijn,
Thanks for the release.
I don't find how to build the javadoc. Apparently, mvn package doesn't do
that anymore.
Not by default: it took too long and too much processing
