des.
Maybe I just haven't found the right web pages that document these
frameworks(?) and how easy it can be to use them. Tips more then welcome!
Regards
/Jimi Hullegård
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-security-what-are-the-best-optio
eeded. Maybe .
4) people use some other framework
1 and 2 seems just plain wrong, the way I see it. If 3 or 4 is the case I
would love to hear about it from someone.
/Jimi
> You can use Spring security with wicket auth-roles, I works out pretty
> nice
> compared to the alternatives. iirc Yo
be exactly the same for a lot of projects, and then it
would be logical to have a shared base for all these projects, maybe as a
part of SWARM/WASP, or wicket auth roles or wicket-shiro.
Regards
/Jimi
> I have a SpringSecurityWebApplication and SpringSecurityWebSession
> class you can use
Reinout wrote:
> Op dinsdag 27-04-2010 om 16:20 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Jimi:
>
> > 2. Seems old. [wicket auth roles + WASP/SWARM] Found a two year old
> > discussion labeled "is wicket-auth-roles discontinued?". And the
> comments on
> > the "Get
documentation there.
ok, sounds like a good move.
Thanks for a great project, by the way. I'm starting to like it more and
more now. :)
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-security-what-are-the-best-options-Spring-Security-reached-almost-
s deployed as ROOT context on
Tomcat 6.0.26.
Is there no solution for this?
Regards
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/root-context-IE-home-page-is-not-found-tp1877009p2075624.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
Not being an expert in either Wicket, HTML or javascript/ajax, I would say
this is not really a Wicket issue... If it is possible in Javascript/Ajax
then it is possible with Wicket.
Maybe this discussion can help:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1060008/is-there-a-way-to-detect-if-a-browser-wi
Erik van Oosten wrote:
> This might be related to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2600?
Well, it sure is related, and that ticket is marked as resolved with 1.4.5.
But the bug still exist in 1.4.7, at least for me.
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-
I have the time, maybe during the upcoming public holiday this week.
/Jim
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>
> Can you reopen that issue and attach a quickstart that demonstrates the
> problem?
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
> O
think about this? The way I see it the class
CheckBoxMultipleChoice should provide a way to get hold of the markup ids of
the checkboxes. Preferably it should add real wicket objects.
Is there any way around this problem?
Regards
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.18429
Thats great news. Thanks Igor.
/Regards
Jimi
Igor Vaynberg-2 wrote:
>
> ive added this...you can take advantage of it in the next release or
> via a snapshot you build yourself..
>
> /**
>* Creates markup id for the input tag used to generate the checkbox
I want is the exact opposite.
Is there an easy way to solve this? Should I implement
IRequestCodingStrategy? If so, is there some good class I can extend so I
don't have to implement all myself (the decode-method of
WebRequestCodingStrategy is final)? Is there maybe even some existing
example that
to this strange behavior? What can I do to
get it to always use "-MM-dd2"? This is very hard for me to debug since
it is client side (ie javascript) behavior, not server side java behavior.
Regards
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Javasc
", build:
"rc1"});
So, does anyone know what I can do to get the correct wicket-date.js? Or
should I report this as a bug somewhere? The way I see it, the javascript
should check if the datepattern matches "" and then leave the year as it
is.
/Jimi
--
View this message i
Thanks Igor. I was already running 1.4.7, but I just upgraded to 1.4.9 and
that solved the problem. But strange that the bugfix wasn't mentioned on the
http://wicket.apache.org/news.html page.
Regards
/Jimi
Igor Vaynberg-2 wrote:
>
> i think this is fixed in 1.4.7+, you sho
15 matches
Mail list logo
